BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 56| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 56 Author: Shelley (D) & Hertzberg (D) Amended: 9/13/01 in Senate Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE ELECTIONS & REAP. COMMITTEE : 6-0, 7/11/01 AYES: Alpert, Burton, Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Polanco SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 8-0, 9/6/01 AYES: Alpert, Bowen, Escutia, Karnette, McPherson, Murray, Perata, Speier SENATE FLOOR : 29-8, 9/14/01 AYES: Alarcon, Alpert, Battin, Brulte, Burton, Chesbro, Costa, Dunn, Escutia, Figueroa, Johannessen, Karnette, Kuehl, Machado, McPherson, Monteith, Murray, O'Connell, Ortiz, Peace, Perata, Polanco, Poochigian, Scott, Soto, Speier, Torlakson, Vasconcellos, Vincent NOES: Ackerman, Haynes, Johnson, Knight, Margett, McClintock, Morrow, Oller ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 71-4, 6/6/01 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Ballot Protection Act of 2002 SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill enacts the Voting Modernization Bond Act of 2002 by placing a bond act on the March primary ballot and authorizes counties to use bond funds for the purchase of updated voting systems in the amount of $200 CONTINUED AB 56 Page 2 million. Senate Floor Amendments of 9/13/01 (1) change the name of the act from the Ballot Protection Act to the Voting Modernization Act, (2) lowers the amount of bonds from $300 million to $200 million, and (3) changes the author. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1.Requires the Secretary of State (SOS) to study and adopt regulations governing the use of voting machines, voting devices, and vote tabulating devices. 2.Provides that no voting system shall be used unless it has received the approval of the SOS prior to any election at which it is to be first used. 3.Provides that any person or corporation owning any voting system may apply to the SOS to examine and report on its accuracy and efficiency to fulfill its purpose. 4.Requires the SOS to hold a public hearing prior to the approval or denial of any voting machine, voting device, or vote tabulating device. Any decision of the SOS in this regard shall be in writing and shall state the findings of the SOS. 5.Provides that the governing board of any locality may adopt for use at elections any kind of voting system provided that its use has been approved by the SOS or specifically authorized by law. The governing board of any locality may, on an experimental basis, use a voting system not previously authorized. This bill: 1.Authorizes the placement of a $200 million General Obligation bond act on the March 5, 2002 primary election ballot. Requires bonds issued under this act be repaid within 10 years. 2.Creates the Voter Modernization Finance Committee, consisting of the State Controller, the Director of the State Department of Finance and the State Treasurer, or AB 56 Page 3 their designated representatives. 3.Limits eligibility for funding from the bonds to counties that meet or adhere to the following requirements: A. The county has purchased a new voting system after January 1, 1999, and is continuing to make payments on that system on the date that this bill becomes effective. B. The county provides matching funds to purchase the updated voting system at a ratio of $1 of county funds for every $3 of bond funds. The funds will not be used to purchase a voting system utilizing prescored punch card ballots. C. The county has not previously requested fund money for the purchase of a new voting system. Applications for expansion of an existing system or components related to a previously approved application shall be accepted. 4.Specifies that, for purposes of this bill, "voting system" includes any voting machine, voting device, or vote-tabulating device that does not use prescored punch card ballots. 5.Specifies that any voting system purchased using bond funds after the date that this bill becomes effective that does not require a voter to directly mark on the ballot must produce, at the time the voter votes his or her ballot or at the time the polls are closed, a paper version or representation of the voted ballot or of all the ballots cast on a unit of the voting system. The paper version shall not be provided to the voter but shall be retained by elections officials for use during the one percent manual recount or other recount or contest. 6.Creates a Voter Modernization Board and designates the board for purposes of the State General Obligation Bond Law and for purposes of administering the Voting Modernization Fund. The board consists of five members, AB 56 Page 4 three selected by the Governor and two selected by the Secretary of State. The board shall have the authority to reject the application for fund money it deems inappropriate, excessive, or that does not comply with the intent of this article. A county whose application is rejected shall be allowed to submit an amended application. 7.Allows the Legislature to amend subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 19234 and Section 19235 of the Election Code by a statute, passed in each house of the Legislature by roll call vote entered in the respective journals, by not less than two-thirds of the membership in each house concurring, if the statute is consistent with, and furthers the purpose of this bill. The Governor's proposed 2001-2002 Budget directed $40 million from the General Fund to the Office of Planning and Research to establish a touch screen voting pilot project in three counties. These funds are deleted in the May Revise of the Governor's Budget. According to the Legislative Analyst's Office, "[t]ouch screen voting systems allow voters to push on screen buttons to record their choice. The system is designed to prevent voters from accidentally voting for multiple candidates for an office for which there can be only one winner. The SOS is responsible for testing and certifying all voting systems used in California elections, including touch screen systems. To date, SOS has certified three different types of touch screen systems for counties to use. In addition, six counties have used touch screen systems to varying degrees in actual elections, and one county has used touch screen voting for an entire general election." FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No Provides for a $200 million Bond Act. SUPPORT : (Verified 9/13/01) AB 56 Page 5 Office of the State Attorney General Secretary of State California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO Congress of California Seniors California Association of Clerks and Election Officials City Clerk Association of California League of California Cities California Association of Counties The Urban Counties Caucus California Public Interest Research Group Alameda County Board of Supervisors Kern County Board of Supervisors Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Napa County Board of Supervisors Orange County Board of Supervisors Riverside County Board of Supervisors Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors Global Election Systems San Joaquin County San Jose/Silicon Valley NAAU Compaq Computer System ACLU California Common Cause City of Albany ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, "[m]any of the voting systems in use in California, while still functional, are technologically obsolete. There is a critical need for the state to work with counties and provide a financial partner to assure that voting systems in California are the most accurate, reliable, and secure in the nation." ASSEMBLY FLOOR AYES: Aanestad, Alquist, Aroner, Ashburn, Bogh, Briggs, Calderon, Bill Campbell, John Campbell, Canciamilla, Cardenas, Cardoza, Cedillo, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Diaz, Dickerson, Dutra, Firebaugh, Florez, Frommer, Goldberg, Harman, Havice, Horton, Jackson, Keeley, Kehoe, Kelley, Koretz, La Suer, Leach, Leonard, Leslie, Liu, Longville, Lowenthal, Maddox, Maldonado, Matthews, Migden, Nakano, Nation, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Robert Pacheco, Rod Pacheco, AB 56 Page 6 Papan, Pavley, Pescetti, Richman, Runner, Salinas, Shelley, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Strom-Martin, Thomson, Vargas, Wayne, Wesson, Wiggins, Wyland, Hertzberg NOES: Daucher, Hollingsworth, Mountjoy, Wyman DLW:cm 9/26/01 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****