BILL ANALYSIS AB 117 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 24, 2001 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS Lou Correa, Chair AB 117 (Migden) - As Introduced: January 22, 2001 SUBJECT : State infrastructure. SUMMARY : Requires that 1% of General Fund revenues shall be used, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act, for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, modernization, or renovation of infrastructure that is owned by the state. EXISTING LAW , AB 1473 (Hertzberg), Chapter 606, Statutes of 1999, requires that, commencing in 2002, the Governor shall submit annually a five-year infrastructure plan to the Legislature. The plan must include identification of infrastructure requested by agencies, aggregate funding for transportation, infrastructure needs for K-12, and instructional facility needs for UC, CSU, and the Community Colleges. Additionally, the plan must detail the cost of providing the needed infrastructure, identify sources of funding, and estimate the impact of funding the infrastructure on California's debt position. FISCAL EFFECT : Potentially significant annual diversion of funding from the General Fund to support state infrastructure. COMMENTS : 1)Purpose of bill . The bill would increase pay-as-you-go funding for infrastructure by setting aside 1% of annual General Fund revenues to be used for the acquisition, building and rehabilitation of state-owned infrastructure, such as universities, highways, correctional facilities, office buildings, state hospitals, and parks. All monies would be appropriated by the Legislative in the annual budget act. 2)Report of Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) . As discussed in the LAO's December 1998 report, "Overhauling the State's Infrastructure Planning and Financing Process," the state owns almost 2.5 million acres of land, 180 million square feet of building space, and 15,000 miles of highways. Much of the state's existing infrastructure is aging and in need of repair and renovation, and accommodating the state's growing AB 117 Page 2 population will require a vast array of new infrastructure. Addressing the issues of growth and aging infrastructure poses a significant challenge to the state. The LAO indicated that adequately funding the state's infrastructure has been a problem for a number of reasons, including: a) Infrastructure investment has not been treated as a program. b) There is no stable funding source for infrastructure. c) There is an over-reliance on bond funding with little pay-as-you-go funding from the General Fund. (For example, from 1994-95 through 1998-99, General Fund debt service on bonds totaled $11.5 billion while direct General Fund appropriations totaled only $735 million. Three-fourths of those direct General Fund appropriations occurred in 1998-99.) 3)Rationale Behind Diverting 1% of General Fund for Infrastructure . The bill diverts 1% of annual General Fund revenues for infrastructure. The case for increasing state resources for infrastructure building and improvement has been made by entities such as the Department of Finance, California Business Roundtable and many others, with an estimated need in the range of $80 to $100 billion over the next decade. The Governor's January budget proposes approximately $760 million from the General Fund for state infrastructure in 2001-02. A 1% diversion of General Fund revenues (based on estimates by the LAO in February) would be approximately $790 million, or $30 million more than the January budget proposal for infrastructure. 4)Related Legislation . AB 1020 (Leach), set for hearing in this committee on April 24, 2001, similarly creates an infrastructure account funded through the diversion of General Fund revenues. AB 1020 uses a sliding scale to gradually increase the percentage of General Fund revenues placed into the infrastructure account, peaking and maintaining at 5% in fiscal year 2017-2018. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support AB 117 Page 3 California Chamber of Commerce Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : Jay Greenwood / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301