BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                   SENATE AGRICULTURE & WATER RESOURCES COMMITTEE
                             Senator Jim Costa, Chairman

          BILL NO:  AB 388                      HEARING:  5/7/02
          AUTHOR:  Strom-Martin                 FISCAL:  Yes
          VERSION:  2/27/02                     CONSULTANT:  Emily  
          Fraciskovich/
                                                             Dennis  
          Albiani
                        Specialty or Alternative Fiber Crops.

          BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW

          Since its founding, America has been a leading producer of fiber  
          crops.  Industrial hemp, now considered a specialty fiber crop,  
          was grown domestically for hundreds of years prior to it's  
          prohibition.  Other specialty fiber crops produced in the United  
          States include kenaf and flax.  Flax, from the Linaceae family,  
          is a dicotyledonous shrubby plant whose stem can be spun into  
          linen thread.  The stalk of Hibiscus cannabinus, or the kenaf  
          plant, is also harvested to produce fiber.  In 1970, the United  
          States placed a prohibition on the harvest industrial hemp.  

          Although industrial hemp could not be harvested, the national  
          prohibition still allowed industrial hemp to be processed and  
          sold.  On October 9, 2001 the Drug Enforcement Administration  
          (DEA) published an interpretive rule banning hemp seed and oil  
          food products that contain any amount of trace  
          tetrahydroconnabinol (THC).  THC is the psychoactive organic  
          compound found in the Cannabis Sativa L. species.  Although  
          industrial hemp contains less than 0.3% THC, it was still  
          subject to the DEA's ban.  The courts eventually ruled to stay  
          DEA's ban on hemp seed and oil food products.  On March 7, 2002,  
          a 9th Circuit Court Order ruled to extend the stay.  In recent  
          years, Hawaii, North Dakota, Minnesota, Arkansas, Kentucky,  
          Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, and Montana have passed  
          legislation legalizing the cultivation of industrial hemp.  

          Today, imported industrial hemp products are being sold legally  
          in the United States, creating an estimated $50 million market.   
          Industrial hemp has a multitude of commercial applications, and  
          demand for those products has resulted in the U.S. becoming the  
          largest importer of foreign-grown hemp-based materials in the  
          world.  Federal and state laws have prevented American farmers  
          from producing for this market.  Although the industrial hemp  
          processing industry has prospered in recent years, domestic  
          industrial hemp production is still in its infancy.  Economic  
          uncertainties still surround the country's industrial hemp  
          producing potential.  




          AB 388 -- 2/27/02 -- Page 2


          
          PROPOSED LAW
          
          This bill would request that the University of California study  
          the economic potential for growing specialty or alternative  
          fiber crops including industrial hemp, kenaf, and flax.

          This bill would request the University of California to assess  
          issues pertaining to production, processing, marketing, and  
          potential barriers to profitability. 

          This measure also request that the findings of the report be  
          delivered to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture and the  
          Senate Committee on Agriculture and Water Resources.  

          COMMENTS

          1.By increasing domestic alternative fiber crop production such  
            as industrial hemp, American producers could potentially tap  
            into a $50 million market.  Proponents of specialty fiber  
            crops state that industrial hemp is one of the strongest  
            natural fibers available.  For example, industrial hemp can be  
            processed into various products from rope and twine to  
            high-end fabrics for clothes.  Additionally, industrial hemp  
            food products are a small but fast-growing sector of the  
            natural foods industry, with annual sales of approximately $5  
            million.  Products include pretzels, chips, energy bars,  
            bread, salad dressing, cereal, cooking oil and ice cream.   
            These products and many others are examples of the potential  
            markets that domestic industrial hemp producers could fill.   

          2.Since the legal proceedings regarding a ban on industrial hemp  
            products is not yet settled, California may be acting  
            prematurely by requesting a study of the economic viability of  
            industrial hemp production.  The DEA may choose to pursue a  
            nationwide ban on industrial hemp products.  If the DEA  
            chooses to ban industrial hemp products the study's findings  
            related to industrial hemp would have little or no use.  

          3.Proponents of the measure state that alternative fiber crops  
            such as industrial hemp have the potential to become effective  
            rotational crops.   Industrial hemp is a hardy plant that  
            grows in most climates up to 16 feet in 70 days, shading out  
            weeds, thereby, reducing the need for agricultural chemical  
            inputs.  After harvest, industrial hemp leaves a field with  
            fewer weeds to eliminate for the next crop. 






          AB 388 -- 2/27/02 -- Page 3


          4.States rights advocates have been urging the U.S. Department  
            of Agriculture (USDA), Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and  
            Congress to revise policies regarding industrial hemp to be  
            less restrictive and to allow states to establish regulatory  
            programs, thereby fostering the development of domestic hemp  
            production by American farmers and manufacturers. 

          5.In addition to studying issues pertaining to potential  
            barriers to profitability for specialty or alternative fiber  
            crops, the committee may wish to consider having the  
            University of California assess the legal barriers associated  
            with growing and harvesting crops such as industrial hemp.  In  
            addition to reporting its finds to the Assembly Committee on  
            Agriculture and the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Water  
            Resources, the committee may wish to have the University of  
            California report its findings to the Department of Food and  
            Agriculture as well.  
          
          PRIOR ACTIONS
          
          Previous actions not relevant to this version of the bill.  

          SUPPORT                                    OPPOSITION
          San Francisco Board of Supervisors         None received.
          16 Individuals