BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       


           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1103|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1103
          Author:   Papan (D)
          Amended:  6/19/01 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 6/12/01
          AYES:  Escutia, Ackerman, Haynes, Kuehl, O'Connell, Peace,  
            Sher

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  76-0, 5/10/01 (Passed on Consent) - See  
            last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Law library boards of trustees

           SOURCE  :     California Law Revision Commission


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes various changes to the law  
          governing county law library boards of trustees.  It  
          authorizes the appointment of non-lawyers as well as  
          lawyers who are not residents of the county to serve on the  
          boards of trustees.  It also revises provisions governing  
          the total number of members of the boards.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides that if a county has  
          three or fewer superior court judges, each of those judges  
          serves as an ex officio member of the law library board of  
          trustees.  When there are three or fewer superior court  
          judges, the judges may at their option choose one judge to  
          serve as trustee and appoint two additional trustees who  
          are members of the county bar.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1103
                                                                Page  
          2

          This bill would allow the judges to appoint residents of  
          the county or members of the state bar to serve as  
          trustees.

          Existing law provides that if a county has four or more  
          superior court judges, those judges will select three  
          judges to serve on the board of trustees.

          This bill would require the judges to select four or five  
          judges to serve on the board of trustees.  

          Existing law permits a judge who is serving on the board of  
          trustees to designate a member of the county bar to act for  
          the judge as trustee.

          This bill would permit judges to designate a resident of  
          the county or a member of the state bar to serve as  
          trustee.

          Existing law provides that the chair of the county board of  
          supervisors is an ex officio member of the board of  
          trustees.  At the request of the chair of the board of  
          supervisors, the board of supervisors may appoint a member  
          of the county bar to serve as trustee in place of the  
          chair.

          This bill would permit the board of supervisors to appoint  
          a resident of the county or a member of the state bar to  
          serve as trustee in place of the chair.

          Existing law provides that the county board of supervisors  
          shall appoint as many additional trustees as are necessary  
          to bring the board of trustees to six or seven total  
          members, depending on the number of municipal court judges  
          serving on the board of trustees.  Existing law also  
          provides procedures governing the service of municipal  
          court judges on the board of trustees.

          This bill would eliminate the provisions governing  
          municipal court judges' service on the board of trustees as  
          well as the link between municipal court judges and the  
          overall size of the board of trustees.  Instead, this bill  
          would provide that the board of supervisors shall appoint  
          as many additional trustees as are necessary to bring the  







                                                               AB 1103
                                                                Page  
          3

          total number of trustees to six or seven.

          Existing law requires that the additional trustees  
          appointed by the board of supervisors be members of the  
          county bar.

          This bill would permit the board of supervisors to appoint  
          members of the state bar to serve as additional trustees.

          This bill would also limit the number of trustees who are  
          not judges of the county, members of the state bar, or  
          members of the board of supervisors, to no more than two.

          Existing law permits the county board of supervisors to  
          reduce the size of the board of trustees to no fewer than  
          three if the board of supervisors finds that there is an  
          insufficient number of members of the county bar eligible  
          to serve on the board of trustees.

          This bill would provide that in any county where there are  
          no more than three superior court judges, the board of  
          supervisors, with the concurrence of the majority of the  
          incumbent superior court judges, may reduce the size of the  
          board of trustees to no fewer than three.

          Existing law contains special statutory provisions  
          governing the boards of trustees for the Los Angeles County  
          and San Diego county law libraries.  Various aspects of  
          this bill would not apply to those counties.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/19/01)

          California Law Revision Commission (source
          Council of California Law Librarians
          Northern California Association of Law Libraries
          Orange County Public Law Library Board of Trustees
          San Diego Area Law Libraries
          Southern California Association of Law Libraries
          San Mateo County Board of Law Library Trustees
          Superior Court Judge Quentin Kopp, San Mateo County








                                                               AB 1103
                                                                Page  
          4

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The bill's supporters argue that  
          it will make needed improvements to the governance of  
          county law libraries.  According to the bill's supporters,  
          some boards of trustees have had problems meeting quorum  
          requirements at their meetings.  The bill's provisions  
          expanding the size of the boards of trustees are intended  
          to make it easier to meet quorum requirements.  The bill  
          also preserves the flexibility needed by smaller counties  
          to reduce the size of the board of trustees if necessary.

          The bill's supporters also argue that there are several  
          benefits to expanding eligibility to serve on the boards of  
          trustees to non-lawyer county residents and non-resident  
          lawyers.  As to the former, they note that the general  
          public represents a large class of law library patrons.   
          Supporters argue that expanding board membership to  
          non-lawyers would help make the law libraries more  
          responsive to their non-lawyer patrons.

          As to the latter, the bill's supporters also emphasize  
          county law libraries are experiencing a funding shortfall.   
          They believe that expanding board membership to county  
          residents and non-resident lawyers may make it easier to  
          develop non-governmental financial support for the  
          libraries.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Bates, Bogh, Briggs,  
            Calderon, Bill Campbell, John Campbell, Canciamilla,  
            Cardenas, Cardoza, Cedillo, Chan, Chavez, Cogdill, Cohn,  
            Corbett, Correa, Cox, Daucher, Diaz, Dickerson, Dutra,  
            Firebaugh, Florez, Frommer, Goldberg, Harman, Havice,  
            Hollingsworth, Jackson, Keeley, Kehoe, Kelley, Koretz, La  
            Suer, Leach, Leonard, Leslie, Longville, Lowenthal,  
            Maddox, Maldonado, Matthews, Migden, Mountjoy, Nakano,  
            Nation, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Robert Pacheco, Rod  
            Pacheco, Papan, Pavley, Pescetti, Reyes, Richman, Runner,  
            Salinas, Shelley, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland,  
            Strom-Martin, Thomson, Vargas, Washington, Wayne, Wesson,  
            Wiggins, Wright, Wyland, Wyman, Zettel, Hertzberg


          RJG:sl  6/19/01   Senate Floor Analyses 








                                                               AB 1103
                                                                Page  
          5

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****