BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1493| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) |Version: | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1493 Author: Pavley (D), et al Amended: 6/28/01 in Senate Vote: 21 PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT SUBJECT : Vehicular Air Pollution Standards: Greenhouse SOURCE : Bluewater Network Coalition for Clean Air Natural Resources Defense Council Sierra Club DIGEST : Senate floor amendments of 6/28/02 delete the provisions of the bill. This bill now requires the State Air Resources Board to develop and adopt, by January 1, 2005, regulations that achieve the maximum feasible and cost-effective reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from passenger, light-duty, and other non-commercial vehicles. NOTE: This bill is similar, with modifications, to AB 1058 which passed the Senate 22-13 on May 2, 2002. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1.Under the federal Clean Air Act, prohibits states from adopting or enforcing standards for the control of new motor vehicles or engines subject to the Act. However, the Act also authorizes the Administrator of the US EPA to waive this prohibition and to allow states to adopt CONTINUED AB 1493 Page 2 standards if specified conditions are met. 2.Under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, and the federal Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, authorizes the secretary of transportation to establish standards for new motor vehicle fuel economy (so-called "corporate average fuel economy" or "CAFE" standards) and generally prohibits states from enacting such standards. 3.Under Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code, requires the state Air Resources Board (ARB) to endeavor to achieve the maximum degree of emission reductions possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in order to achieve attainment of state ambient air standards by the earliest practicable date. 4.Under Chapter 6 of the Health and Safety Code, requires the Secretary for Resources to establish a California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) for the purposes of allowing parties which emit greenhouse gas emissions voluntarily to register reductions in their emissions in order to have them recognized by the State of California in any future regulatory or treaty protocol requiring the reduction in greenhouse gases. 5.Also under that chapter, requires the Governor to appoint a seven-member board of directors to oversee operation of the registry and establishes detailed procedures for the quantification and registering of emissions registered under the registry's auspices and requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (The California Energy Commission or CEC) to undertake specified activities relative to the implementation of the CCAR. 6.Under the Warren-Alquist Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act, requires the CEC to prepare an inventory of greenhouse gas emissions produced by the state, to update that inventory by specified dates, to establish a task force and advisory committee on climate change, and to coordinate state responses to the impacts of climate change on the state. AB 1493 Page 3 FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 6/28/02) Bluewater Network (co-source) Coalition for Clean Air (co-source) Natural Resources Defense Council (co-source) Sierra Club (co-source) American Lung Association Architects/Designers/Planners for Social Responsibility Bay Area Air Quality Management District California League of Conservation Voters Cities of Los Angeles and San Jose Clean Power Campaign Community Alliance with Family Farmers East Bay Municipal Utility District Planning and Conservation League Sacramento Municipal Utility District Coalition of Organizations 160 individual letters from all across the U.S. OPPOSITION : (Verified 6/28/02) Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers Automobile Club of Southern California California Chamber of Commerce California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance California Manufacturers and Technology Association California Motor Car Dealers Association California State Automobile Association Daimler Chrysler Corporation General Motors Corporation San Diego Industrial Environmental Association Tustin Chamber of Commerce Western States Petroleum Association California League of Off Road Voters ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office and the bill's supporters, global warming is an international problem with the potential for state and local impacts including: reductions in the state's water supply due to changes in the snow pack levels in the Sierra Nevada Mountains and the timing of spring run-off; adverse AB 1493 Page 4 health impacts from increases in air pollution caused by higher temperatures; adverse impacts upon agriculture and food production as a result of projected changes in the amount and consistency of water supplies; potential damage to the state's extensive coastline and ocean ecosystems due to the increase in storms and rise in sea level. Supporters state that the United States is home to four percent of the world's population and 25 percent of the greenhouse gasses. California is the fifth largest economy in the world. Passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks are responsible for approximately 40 percent of the total greenhouse gas pollution in the state. More than twice the amount of greenhouse gas pollution from motor vehicles in other parts of the country. California has a long history of being the first in the nation to take action to protect public health and the environment with respect to motor vehicles and federal law recognizes the authority of California to take such actions. Finally, the supporters note that they have gone to great pains to amend the bill to address most of the opponents stated concerns. The purpose of this measure is to direct the ARB to adopt standards to address greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Opponents to this measure state that the provisions of the bill "offers no California emissions benefits, are bad for consumers, and are pre-empted by federal law." They note that regulation of vehicular fuel economy is a federal issue into which the states may not intrude, and that enactment of the measure will almost certainly lead to litigation in the federal courts over its effect. The opponents also state that the bill will limit consumer choice and increase the costs of vehicles in the state while potentially making vehicles less safe due to presumed reductions in their weight to increase fuel efficiency and reduce emissions. Opponents further state that, unlike standards for criteria air pollutants, greenhouse gas emission standards will not assist in improving public health since greenhouse gas emissions disperse evenly in the atmosphere. They state that California's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is less than one tenth of one percent and that adoption of AB 1493 Page 5 the standards will have a "negligible effect" on climate change worldwide. Finally, opponents state that California voters rejected greenhouse gas emission controls in 1990 when they defeated Proposition 128, the so-called "Big Green" Initiative. CP:sl 6/28/02 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: NONE RECEIVED **** END ****