BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1857
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 9, 2002
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
Lou Correa, Chair
AB 1857 (Wayne) - As Amended: March 19, 2002
SUBJECT : Administrative Procedure Act.
SUMMARY : Clarifies and refines the administrative rulemaking
procedure based on recommendations of the California Law Review
Commission. Specifically, this bill :
1)Expands the requirement that an agency publish certain
rulemaking documents on its website to include the text of a
proposed emergency rulemaking action and the date the proposed
action is submitted to the Office of Administrative Law.
2)Provides that rulemaking documents shall be posted on issuance
and remain posted until at least 15 days after the end of the
rulemaking process.
3)Clarifies requirements that an agency must describe reasonable
alternatives to a proposed regulation and reasonable
alternatives that would lessen any adverse impact on small
business. It does this by stating that both requirements are
subject to the existing rule that an agency need not
"artificially construct alternatives or justify why it has not
identified alternatives" and revises these provisions to make
them more uniform.
4)Replaces ambiguous provisions with a requirement that an
agency representative either responds to the substantive
questions regarding inquiries on proposed regulations or
directs them to another person in the agency for a prompt
response.
5)Adjusts the scope of the exemption that the Fish and Game
Commission has from certain time periods specified in the
rulemaking procedure by including a recently added time period
that should have been covered in previous legislation but was
not.
EXISTING LAW under the Administrative Procedure Act details the
requirements that regulations must adhere to prior to their
adoption. These requirements include public comment periods on
AB 1857
Page 2
proposed regulations, review periods, publication requirements,
and implementation procedures. The Office of Administrative Law
is the state government entity that oversees the adoption of
proposed regulations.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS :
1)The author is carrying this bill on behalf of the California
Law Review Commission (CLRC). According to the CRLC, this
bill is the product of the Commission's recommendation on
Administrative Rulemaking Refinements (February 2002). This
recommendation addresses rulemaking issues not previously
considered by the Commission in prior legislation, AB 1822
(Wayne), Chapter 1060, Statutes of 2000.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
California Law Review Commission (sponsor)
Consumer Attorneys of California
Opposition
None on file.
Analysis Prepared by : David Pacheco / B. & P. / (916)
319-3301