BILL ANALYSIS AB 1857 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 9, 2002 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS Lou Correa, Chair AB 1857 (Wayne) - As Amended: March 19, 2002 SUBJECT : Administrative Procedure Act. SUMMARY : Clarifies and refines the administrative rulemaking procedure based on recommendations of the California Law Review Commission. Specifically, this bill : 1)Expands the requirement that an agency publish certain rulemaking documents on its website to include the text of a proposed emergency rulemaking action and the date the proposed action is submitted to the Office of Administrative Law. 2)Provides that rulemaking documents shall be posted on issuance and remain posted until at least 15 days after the end of the rulemaking process. 3)Clarifies requirements that an agency must describe reasonable alternatives to a proposed regulation and reasonable alternatives that would lessen any adverse impact on small business. It does this by stating that both requirements are subject to the existing rule that an agency need not "artificially construct alternatives or justify why it has not identified alternatives" and revises these provisions to make them more uniform. 4)Replaces ambiguous provisions with a requirement that an agency representative either responds to the substantive questions regarding inquiries on proposed regulations or directs them to another person in the agency for a prompt response. 5)Adjusts the scope of the exemption that the Fish and Game Commission has from certain time periods specified in the rulemaking procedure by including a recently added time period that should have been covered in previous legislation but was not. EXISTING LAW under the Administrative Procedure Act details the requirements that regulations must adhere to prior to their adoption. These requirements include public comment periods on AB 1857 Page 2 proposed regulations, review periods, publication requirements, and implementation procedures. The Office of Administrative Law is the state government entity that oversees the adoption of proposed regulations. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : 1)The author is carrying this bill on behalf of the California Law Review Commission (CLRC). According to the CRLC, this bill is the product of the Commission's recommendation on Administrative Rulemaking Refinements (February 2002). This recommendation addresses rulemaking issues not previously considered by the Commission in prior legislation, AB 1822 (Wayne), Chapter 1060, Statutes of 2000. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support California Law Review Commission (sponsor) Consumer Attorneys of California Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : David Pacheco / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301