BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1419| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 1419 Author: Alarcon (D) Amended: 8/23/02 Vote: 21 SENATE LABOR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-3, 4/10/02 AYES: Alarcon, Figueroa, Kuehl, Polanco, Romero NOES: Margett, McClintock, Oller SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE : 7-2, 5/1/02 AYES: Vasconcellos, Alarcon, Alpert, Chesbro, Karnette, O'Connell, Ortiz NOES: McPherson, Knight SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE : 8-1, 5/21/02 AYES: Vasconcellos, Alarcon, Alpert, Chesbro, Karnette, O'Connell, Ortiz, Sher NOES: Knight SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 7-3, 6/3/02 AYES: Alpert, Bowen, Escutia, Karnette, Murray, Perata, Speier NOES: Johnson, McPherson, Poochigian SENATE FLOOR : 22-15, 6/10/02 AYES: Alarcon, Alpert, Bowen, Burton, Chesbro, Dunn, Escutia, Figueroa, Karnette, Kuehl, Machado, Murray, O'Connell, Ortiz, Peace, Perata, Romero, Sher, Soto, Speier, Torlakson, Vasconcellos NOES: Ackerman, Battin, Brulte, Costa, Haynes, Johannessen, Johnson, Knight, Margett, McClintock, McPherson, Monteith, Morrow, Oller, Poochigian CONTINUED SB 1419 Page 2 ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 47-29, 8/26/02 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Personal services contracting SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill establishes standards for the use of personal service contracts in California school districts and community college districts. Assembly Amendments make clarifying changes and state legislative intent that districts use cost information that is readily available, as specified. ANALYSIS : Current law does not specifically restrict the use of personal service contracts by governing boards of California school and community college districts. For state services, current law provides standards for the use of personal service contracts with specific criteria for contracting outside state service. These criteria include demonstration of cost savings, definition of costs, and requirements that work not be contracted out solely on the basis of lower pay rates or benefits, and justification of savings based on the size and duration of the contract. The State Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) is a quasi-judicial agency which oversees public sector collective bargaining in California. PERB administers four collective bargaining statutes, ensures their consistent implementation and application, and adjudicates disputes between the parties subject to them. The statutes administered by PERB include the Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA) of 1976, which established collective bargaining in California's public schools (K-12) and community colleges. This bill establishes standards for the use of personal service contracts in school districts and community college districts and: SB 1419 Page 3 1.Restricts personal services contracting for the purpose of achieving cost savings, permitting so only if the following conditions are met: A. Actual cost savings be demonstration, to be determined through the inclusion and exclusion of specific costs, as specified. B. The proposed contractor's wages are at the industry's level, and do not undercut school district pay rates. C. The contract does not result in displacement, as defined, of school district employees. E. Various additional requirements. 2.Restricts personal services contracting, unless the following conditions are met: A. The Legislature mandates or authorizes work be performed by independent contractors, and the contract is for new school district functions. B. Services are unavailable or unable to be satisfactorily performed by district employees. C. Services which are incidental to a purchase or lease contract. D. The policy, administrative, or legal goals/purposes cannot be accomplished through the regular or ordinary hiring process. E. The nature of the work is such that criteria for an emergency appointment applies, i.e. necessary to prevent the stoppage of public business or because of the limited duration of the work. F. The district cannot feasibly supply the equipment, materials, facilities, or support services provided. G. The contract is for services of an urgent, temporary, or occasional nature. SB 1419 Page 4 3.Restricts application of the bill's provisions to new contracts initiated after January 1, 2003. Existing contracts or renewals of existing contracts are exempted, unless substantially modified. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes Unknown, major costs ongoing. SUPPORT : (Verified 6/4/02) (Unable to reverify at time of writing) California School Employees Association American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees OPPOSITION : (Verified 6/4/02) (Unable to reverify at time of writing) American Institute of Architects, California Council Association of California School Administrators California School Board's Association California School Bus Contractor's Association Cardinal Transportation Group, Inc. Community College League of California Durham School Services First Student Laidlaw Education Services Los Angeles Unified School District Orinda Union School District San Francisco Unified School District ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : Supporters contend that this bill does not prohibit personal service contracts, but rather merely mirrors the guidelines and requirements that every state agency in California must currently follow when entering into personal service contracts. Supporters assert that there have been many cases of school districts contracting out jobs and services, only to find that the contracts ended up costing more and delivering less. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Opponents assert that the bill SB 1419 Page 5 creates significant costs and administrative burdens by creating added state mandates that include the cost for the process of bidding and the requirement to hire someone if unable to contract out for services. Opponents additionally contend that PERB has ruled that EERA's mandatory subjects of bargaining include the employer's decision to contract out work. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : AYES: Alquist, Aroner, Calderon, Canciamilla, Cardenas, Cedillo, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cohn, Corbett, Correa, Diaz, Dutra, Firebaugh, Florez, Frommer, Goldberg, Havice, Hertzberg, Horton, Jackson, Keeley, Kehoe, Koretz, Liu, Longville, Lowenthal, Migden, Nakano, Nation, Negrete McLeod, Papan, Pavley, Reyes, Salinas, Shelley, Simitian, Steinberg, Strom-Martin, Thomson, Vargas, Washington, Wayne, Wiggins, Wright, Wesson NOES: Aanestad, Ashburn, Bates, Bogh, Briggs, Bill Campbell, John Campbell, Cogdill, Cox, Daucher, Dickerson, Harman, Hollingsworth, Kelley, La Suer, Leach, Leonard, Leslie, Maddox, Maldonado, Mountjoy, Robert Pacheco, Rod Pacheco, Richman, Runner, Strickland, Wyland, Wyman, Zettel NC:cm 8/27/02 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****