BILL NUMBER: AB 443 CHAPTERED 08/27/01 CHAPTER 205 FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE AUGUST 27, 2001 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR AUGUST 27, 2001 PASSED THE ASSEMBLY JULY 23, 2001 PASSED THE SENATE JULY 22, 2001 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 21, 2001 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 23, 2001 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Aanestad (Coauthors: Senators Costa, Johannessen, McPherson, Monteith, and Oller) FEBRUARY 20, 2001 An act to add Chapter 6.9 (commencing with Section 30070) to Division 3 of Title 3 of the Government Code, relating to law enforcement, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 443, Aanestad. Law enforcement funding. Existing law provides specified funding for local law enforcement through the Local Public Safety Fund and local supplemental law enforcement services funds. This bill would appropriate $18,500,000 annually from the General Fund to the Controller for allocation to specified rural and small county sheriffs' departments to enhance law enforcement efforts in those counties. The bill would restrict, as specified, the use of these and specified other law enforcement funds for surveillance or monitoring of persons. The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Appropriation: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 6.9 (commencing with Section 30070) is added to Division 3 of Title 3 of the Government Code, to read: CHAPTER 6.9. LOCAL ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL AND SMALL COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT 30070. The sum of eighteen million five hundred thousand dollars ($18,500,000) is hereby annually appropriated from the General Fund to the Controller for allocation to county sheriffs' departments to enhance law enforcement efforts in the counties specified in subdivisions (a) to (ak), inclusive, according to the following schedule: (a) Alpine County .................. 500,000 (b) Amador County .................. 500,000 (c) Butte County ................... 500,000 (d) Calaveras County ............... 500,000 (e) Colusa County .................. 500,000 (f) Del Norte County ............... 500,000 (g) El Dorado County................ 500,000 (h) Glenn County ................... 500,000 (i) Humboldt County ................ 500,000 (j) Imperial County ................ 500,000 (k) Inyo County .................... 500,000 (l) Kings County ................ 500,000 (m) Lake County .................... 500,000 (n) Lassen County .................. 500,000 (o) Madera County ................. 500,000 (p) Marin County ................... 500,000 (q) Mariposa County ................ 500,000 (r) Mendocino County ............... 500,000 (s) Merced County .................. 500,000 (t) Modoc County ................... 500,000 (u) Mono County .................... 500,000 (v) Napa County .................... 500,000 (w) Nevada County .................. 500,000 (x) Placer County .................. 500,000 (y) Plumas County .................. 500,000 (z) San Benito County .............. 500,000 (aa) San Luis Obispo County ........ 500,000 (ab) Santa Cruz County ............. 500,000 (ac) Shasta County ................. 500,000 (ad) Sierra County ................. 500,000 (ae) Siskiyou County ............... 500,000 (af) Sutter County ................. 500,000 (ag) Tehama County ................. 500,000 (ah) Trinity County ................ 500,000 (ai) Tuolumne County................ 500,000 (aj) Yolo County ................... 500,000 (ak) Yuba County ................... 500,000 30071. If any funds made available pursuant to Section 30061 or 30070, or pursuant to Item 8100-102-0001, 9210-106-0001, or 9210-108-0001 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2001, or an appropriation for the same purpose in a subsequent budget act, are used to fund the surveillance or monitoring of persons, the use of those funds shall comply with both of the following requirements: (1) The funds may only be used by law enforcement personnel or employees of governmental agencies or other entities, either public or private, for video surveillance or monitoring when there is an articulable suspicion that the persons who are the target of the surveillance or monitoring are engaging or have engaged in illegal conduct. (2) The funds may not be used for any video surveillance or monitoring of the general population. SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: In order to ensure adequate funding for essential law enforcement services, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.