BILL NUMBER: SB 1224 CHAPTERED 09/04/01 CHAPTER 234 FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 1, 2001 PASSED THE ASSEMBLY AUGUST 20, 2001 PASSED THE SENATE MAY 24, 2001 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 24, 2001 INTRODUCED BY Committee on Agriculture and Water Resources (Senators Costa (Chair), Alpert, Kuehl, Machado, Monteith, and Torlakson) MARCH 26, 2001 An act to amend Section 10252 of, and add Section 615 to, the Public Resources Code, relating to farmland conservancy. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1224, Committee on Agriculture and Water Resources. Farmland conservancy. Existing law, the California Farmland Conservancy Program Act, establishes a program for grants from the Department of Conservation to local governments and nonprofit organizations, subject to prescribed requirements and in accordance with procedures set forth in the act, for the acquisition of agricultural conservation easements, as defined, and for incidental costs. If a proposed agricultural conservation easement meets the eligibility criteria of the act, the department reviews the proposal based on selection criteria, which take into consideration the amount of matching funds and in-kind services contributed by local governments. This bill would expand the selection criteria to consider matching funds and in-kind services contributed by sources other than local governments. Existing law establishes supplemental requirements, as specified, for contracts entered into by any state agency for the procurement of materials, supplies, equipment, and services. This bill would exempt grant awards made pursuant to specified grant programs by the Department of Conservation from the requirements pertaining to public contracts. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 615 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: 615. Grants awarded by the department, including, but not limited to, those awarded pursuant to Division 9 (commencing with Section 9000), Division 10.2 (commencing with Section 10200), and Division 12.1 (commencing with Section 14500), are not subject to the State Contract Act, Part 2 (commencing with Section 10100) of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code or Article 6 (commencing with Section 999) of Chapter 6 of Division 4 of the Military and Veterans Code. SEC. 2. Section 10252 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read: 10252. If the department determines that the proposed agricultural conservation easement meets the eligibility criteria set forth in Section 10251, the proposal shall be reviewed based upon the extent to which it satisfies the following selection criteria: (a) The quality of the agricultural land, based on land capability, farmland mapping and monitoring program definitions, productivity indices, and other soil, climate, and vegetative factors. (b) The proposal meets multiple natural resource conservation objectives, including, but not limited to, wetland protection, wildlife habitat conservation, and scenic open-space preservation. (c) The city or county demonstrates a long-term commitment to agricultural land conservation as demonstrated by the following: (1) The general plan and related land use policies of the city or county. (2) Policies of the local agency formation commission. (3) California Environmental Quality Act policies and procedures. (4) The existence of active local agricultural land conservancies or trusts. (5) The use of an effective right-to-farm ordinance. (6) Applied strategies for the economic support and enhancement of agricultural enterprise, including water policies, public education, marketing support, and consumer and recreational incentives. (7) Other relevant policies and programs. (d) If the land is in a county that participates in the Williamson Act (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 51200) of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code), the land proposed for protection is within a county or city designated agricultural preserve. (e) The land proposed for conservation is within two miles outside of the exterior boundary of the sphere of influence of a city as established by the local agency formation commission. (f) The applicant demonstrates fiscal and technical capability to effectively carry out the proposal. Technical capability may be demonstrated by agricultural land conservation expertise on the governing board or staff of the applicant, or through partnership with an organization that has that expertise. (g) The proposal demonstrates a coordinated approach among affected landowners, local governments, and nonprofit organizations. If other entities are affected, there is written support from those entities for the proposal and a willingness to cooperate. The support of neighboring landowners who are not involved in the proposal shall be considered. (h) The conservation of the land supports long-term private stewardship and continued agricultural production in the region. (i) The proposal demonstrates an innovative approach to agricultural land conservation with a potential for wide application in the state. (j) The amount of matching funds and in-kind services contributed by local governments and other sources. (k) The price of the proposed easement purchase is cost-effective in comparison to the actual easement value. (l) Other relevant considerations established by the director.