BILL NUMBER: SB 776 CHAPTERED 10/13/01 CHAPTER 857 FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE OCTOBER 13, 2001 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR OCTOBER 12, 2001 PASSED THE SENATE SEPTEMBER 13, 2001 PASSED THE ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 5, 2001 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 3, 2001 AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 2, 2001 INTRODUCED BY Senator Torlakson (Principal coauthor: Senator Karnette) FEBRUARY 23, 2001 An act to add and repeal Section 1680 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 776, Torlakson. DUI offenses: fines. Under existing law, a person who is convicted of a driving while under the influence offense is required to be punished by terms of imprisonment, fines, and other sanctions, including required attendance in a licensed driving-under-the-influence program. Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to undertake various functions with regard to administering driver's licenses, including certain functions concerning the imposition of sanctions involving driving-under-the-influence offenders. This bill would require the department to review the effectiveness of programs, procedures, sanctions, fines, and fees provided for in current law relating to the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and to report those findings to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2002. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following: (a) Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs (DUI) continues to be a significant threat to public health and safety. (b) Despite significant progress in reducing incidences of DUI, more than 190,000 arrests were made for DUI offenses in California in 1999, including more than 25 percent that were repeat offenders, highlighting the need to continue efforts to assess, treat, and make accountable those individuals and families who continue to suffer from alcohol and drug abuse. (c) The Department of Motor Vehicles reported in the 2001 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System, alcohol treatment, in conjunction with license restriction, continued to be the most effective postconviction sanction in reducing subsequent DUI incidents among DUI offenders. (d) The State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs reported that the benefits of alcohol and other drug treatment outweigh the costs to taxpayers by ratios from 4 to 1 to greater than 12 to 1. SEC. 2. Section 1680 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 1680. (a) The department shall review scientific and other empirical evidence on the effectiveness of programs, procedures, sanctions, fines, and fees in current law relating to the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both. In undertaking the review, the department may also consult with representatives of law enforcement, district attorneys, public defenders, and licensed driving-under-the-influence programs, and any other appropriate persons or entities. The department shall report on or before July 1, 2002, to the Legislature as to any findings regarding sanction and program effectiveness, particularly with respect to repeat offenders, and submit any recommendations to improve individual accountability, public education, sanctions, and programs to reduce recidivism. The report may also include recommendations for any statutory changes that would modify the responsibilities of agencies or the courts so that violators can be sanctioned and treated appropriately and effectively, based on demonstrated sanction and program effectiveness. (b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2003, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2003, deletes or extends that date.