BILL ANALYSIS
AB 862
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 862 (Firebaugh)
As Amended July 14, 2003
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |73-0 |(May 8, 2003) |SENATE: |23-15|(August 27, |
| | | | | |2003) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: P.E., R. & S.S.
SUMMARY : Requires a state agency that seeks the consent of the
Attorney General (AG) to employ outside counsel shall provide
the representative of State Employees Bargaining Unit 2
(Bargaining Unit 2) with notice of the request.
The Senate amendments :
1)Provide specific timelines and requirements for providing
notice to Bargaining Unit 2.
2)Provide specific details regarding the contents of the notice.
3)State the notice is to be deemed a privileged communication.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Establishes standards for the use of personal services
contracts outside the civil service system if contracting
would achieve cost savings, as defined, or if certain
conditions can be met.
2)Provides, with certain exceptions, that the written consent of
the AG is required prior to the employment of counsel for
representation of any state agency or employee in any judicial
proceeding.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill:
1)Required that state agencies, as defined, and the AG, provide
specified notices to the designated representative of
Bargaining Unit 2 regarding contracts for legal services with
outside counsel and the consent of the AG with regard to those
contracts.
AB 862
Page 2
2)Exempted from the notice requirement certain confidential
matters and deems disclosures made in a notice to be
privileged communications.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS : According to supporters, this bill would provide
substantial cost savings to the state by ensuring that the work
that is performed by the state's existing work force is not
contracted out unnecessarily to other providers at substantially
higher costs. The issue is not currently negotiated in
collective bargaining however in the event that an agreement is
reached in collective bargaining that agreement would supersede
this statute. The bill had opposition last year in its AB 2850
form, however the California Attorneys, Administrative Law
Judges, Hearing Officers and Deputy Labor Commissioners in State
Employment (CASE) worked to resolve those issues which are
reflected in this version of the bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Clem Meredith / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916)
319-3957
FN: 0002923