BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 3081|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
CONSENT
Bill No: AB 3081
Author: Senate Judiciary Committee
Amended: As introduced
Vote: 21
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE : 6-0, 6/1/04
AYES: Escutia, Morrow, Ackerman, Cedillo, Ducheny, Kuehl
NO VOTE RECORDED: Sher
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 71-0, 4/19/04 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Civil discovery: statutes reorganization
SOURCE : California Law Revision Commission
DIGEST : This bill reorganizes the statutes governing
civil discovery into short sections closely tracking the
existing language and sequencing.
ANALYSIS : Existing law specifies the manner and methods
of discovery in civil actions and cases.
This bill effects a non-substantive reorganization of the
sections to make the statutes more user-friendly and
facilitating amendment and sound development of the law.
Background
In 2003, the Legislature directed the California Law Review
Commission (CLRC) to study discovery in civil cases.
CONTINUED
AB 3081
Page
2
CLRC issued its recommendation in September 2003,
recommending no substantive changes, only a reorganization
of the statutes governing civil discovery into short
sections closely tracking the existing language and
sequencing.
This bill results form the CLRC recommendation.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 6/2/04)
California Law Review Commission (source)
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : In its recommendaiton, the CLrC
states that the statutes governing civil discovery are
logically organized but are difficult to use due to their
length and complexity. For example, Code of Civil
Procedure Section 2025 currently consists of 22
subdivisions, 705 paragraphs, and 8,148 words.
CLRC states the "reorganization will enhance readability
for courts and practitioners, and assist them in
interpreting and following the law. Breaking the law into
shorter, more comprehensive segments will enable a person
to readily locate pertinent provisions by using a table of
contents?"
ASSEMBLY FLOOR
AYES: Aghazarian, Bates, Berg, Bermudez, Bogh, Calderon,
Campbell, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn,
Corbett, Cox, Daucher, Diaz, Dutra, Dutton, Dymally,
Firebaugh, Frommer, Garcia, Goldberg, Hancock, Harman,
Haynes, Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton, Houston, Jackson,
Kehoe, Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno, Leslie,
Levine, Lieber, Liu, Longville, Lowenthal, Maddox,
Maldonado, Maze, Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi,
Nakano, Nation, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Pacheco, Pavley,
Plescia, Reyes, Richman, Runner, Salinas, Samuelian,
Simitian, Spitzer, Steinberg, Strickland, Wesson,
Wiggins, Wolk, Wyland, Yee
NO VOTE RECORDED: Benoit, Correa, Keene, Matthews,
AB 3081
Page
3
McCarthy, Parra, Ridley-Thomas, Vargas, Nunez
RJG:cm 6/2/04 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****