BILL ANALYSIS AB 115 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 16, 2005 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION Johan Klehs, Chair AB 115 (Klehs) - As Amended: May 2, 2005 Majority vote. Tax Levy. Fiscal Committee. SUBJECT : Personal income and corporation taxes: Conformity SUMMARY : Generally conforms California personal income and corporation tax laws to federal income tax laws as set forth in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of January 1, 2005, with limited exceptions. Specifically, this bill : 1)Conforms to many provisions of the numerous federal tax bills that have been enacted since the last conformity date, as well as maintaining separate tax laws in selected areas. Specifically adopts: a) Exception to passive activity loss rules for real estate professionals. b) Expansion of the exclusion from income for qualified foster care payments. c) Creation of the health savings accounts (HSAa). Also made retroactive to taxable year 2004 to permit transfers of remaining balances from Archer Medical Savings Accounts (Archer MSAs) to HSAs without being taxed as a disqualified distribution. 2)Adopts the uniform definition of "child", extension of provisions regarding Archer MSAs, and technical amendments related to prior tax legislation from the Working Families Tax relief Act of 2004 (WFTRA), also known as Public Law 108-311. 3)Conforms to numerous provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA of 2004), also known as Public Law 108-357 adopted. Specifically includes: a) Miscellaneous technical and administrative provisions dealing with S corporations and real estate investment trusts. AB 115 Page 2 b) Allowance of certain expenses related to rural letter carriers without limitation. c) Transfers of suspended losses incident to divorce. d) Special rules for livestock sold on account of weather-related conditions. e) Expensing of reforestation expenditures. f) Modification of class life (for depreciation purposes) of certain track facilities. g) Changes related to charitable deductions including limitation of the amount of the deduction for contributions of motor vehicles, boats and airplanes to the amount the charity receives at a subsequent sale; increased reporting requirements for noncash charitable contributions; and revised rules for treatment of contributions of patents and similar property. h) Provisions related to reportable transactions and tax shelters. i) Limitation of employer deductions for certain entertainment expenses. 4)Conforms via stand alone legislation to AJCA of 2004 provisions allowing current expense of capital costs related to compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sulfur regulations and tax credit for the production of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel. 5)Does not conform to several provisions of AJCA of 2004, primarily for reasons of cost. The more notable of the nonconformity provisions are as follows: a) Various depreciation-related provisions including: Two-year extension of increased expensing for small businesses (not in conformity with expiring provisions); reduced recovery period for depreciation of certain leasehold improvements and restaurant property; modification of application of income forecast method; modification of depreciation rules for motion picture and AB 115 Page 3 television productions, and aircraft. b) Various provisions related to foreign corporations, foreign tax credits, etc. c) Deductions for dividends repatriated to the United States (U.S.) from foreign subsidiaries. EXISTING LAW bases much of its tax laws on the federal IRC. California does not automatically conform to new federal legislation. Rather, California may conform to specific enactments at the federal level or may conform to the IRC as of a specified date. The latest IRC to which California has conformed is that in effect as of January 1, 2001. Since the last "date change" legislation, California has adopted several provisions of federal legislation, but there remain many federal tax provisions representing selected areas of nonconformity, as explicitly stated in the California Revenue and Taxation Code. FISCAL EFFECT : The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) prepared the following estimate of the revenue impacts in their specific fiscal year (FY) of the primary conformity pieces of this bill: ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | REVENUE IMPACT | | PROVISION | ($ MILLIONS) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| | | FY | FY | FY | | |2005-06|2006-0|2007-0| | | | 7 | 8 | |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |Exception to passive activity loss rules | -$35 | | | |for real estate professionals | |-$25 |-$25 | |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |Expansion of exclusion from income for | -$ | -$ | -$ | |qualified foster care payments |4 |3 |3 | |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |Health Savings Accounts-applicable to | | | | |taxable years beginning after December | -$29 | | -$23 | |31, 2003, with amended returns allowed | |-$18 | | |for taxable year 2004 | | | | |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |Uniform definition of child and other | -$10 | -$ 7 | -$ | |provisions of WFTRA | | |7 | AB 115 Page 4 |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |Miscellaneous provisions of AJCA adopted | | | | |by date-change conformity |+$30.4 |+$39.1|+$37.2| |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |Stand-alone conformity to provisions | | | | |dealing with EPA sulfur regulations and | -$ .4 | | -$ | |tax credit for the production of | |-$1.1 |1.2 | |ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel | | | | |------------------------------------------+-------+------+------| |TOTAL | -$48 | | -$22 | | | |-$15 | | ---------------------------------------------------------------- Proposition 98 Fiscal Effect : Committee staff estimate the revenue loss to K-14 school funding will be $26 million in FY 2005-06, $8 million in FY 2006-07, and $12 million in FY 2007-08. COMMENTS : 1)There have been no fewer than five federal tax bills during the period since California last conformed its tax laws to the IRC as of January 1, 2005. California has adopted some of the tax law changes in a piece-meal fashion, but has not considered a general conformity measure for several years. Federal tax legislation enacted in late 2004 was so substantial as to warrant serious consideration of a "date change" conformity measure. The author proffers this "date change" conformity measure so that California will be one step closer to federal tax law, which should enhance compliance with the California tax laws. 2)Committee staff note that nonconformity can lead to a myriad of problems for California taxpayers. Specifically: a) The failure to conform to federal law in some areas but not in other related areas can be confusing and might lead to improper tax reporting to California. An example of this situation is California's failure to conform to the exception to passive loss rules for real estate professionals despite conformity with the remaining passive activity loss rules. b) Other areas should be adopted so that taxpayers who follow federal laws will not automatically violate of AB 115 Page 5 California tax laws. An example of this situation is the ability to roll-over balances in an Archer MSA to the new HSAs without triggering a tax liability at the federal level. However, for California tax purposes, that roll-over would constitute a disqualified distribution from the Archer MSA and the taxpayer would be subject to tax and penalties for the transfer that is wholly approved for federal tax purposes. c) Another area involves failure to conform to definitions. For example, the federal tax law adopted a uniform definition of "child" for purposes of all provisions that provide tax benefits with respect to children. These provisions include head of household filing status, dependent care credit, child care credits, earned income credit, and the dependency exemption. The statutes used slightly differing definitions or separate criteria, which caused some persons be classified as a child for some tax purposes but not for others. California also has varying definitions for "child" and California taxpayers would benefit from consistent definitions as well. 3)Several bills have been introduced in this legislative session that provide specific levels of conformity of California tax laws to Federal legislation that passed during 2004. Only this bill proposes a comprehensive adoption of Federal legislation, accomplished by way of conforming to the IRC as of January 1, 2005, with specific exceptions as noted. AB 398 (Villines) conforms to the enhanced depreciation deductions. AB 661 (Plescia) and SB 173 (Maldonado) conform to the federal provisions for health savings accounts. AB 666 (Bermudez) conforms to the federal deduction for dividends repatriated to the U.S. from foreign subsidiaries. AB 810 (Parra) conforms to the federal provisions allowing enhanced expensing and credits related to production of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel. All of these bills are pending before the Revenue and Taxation Committees of their respective houses of origin. 4)FTB staff note that the provisions dealing with low-sulfur diesel fuel target the tax benefit to activities within California. A recent federal Court of Appeals decision found that an investment credit offered by the State of Ohio was unconstitutional because it gave preferential tax treatment to companies that located or expanded in Ohio over taxpayer locating in a different state. That decision, Cuno v. AB 115 Page 6 DaimlerChrysler (2004), 386 F. 2d 738, was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court accepted the case for review. Although a decision has not yet been issued, FTB staff note that targeted tax incentives conditioned on activities occurring in California may be subject to constitutional challenge. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support California ACORN Opposition None in file Analysis Prepared by : Kimberly Bott / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098