BILL ANALYSIS 1
SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER
Senator Sheila Kuehl, Chair
2005-2006 Regular Session
BILL NO: AB 984
AUTHOR: Laird
AMENDED: January 4, 2006
FISCAL: Yes HEARING DATE:June 13, 2006
URGENCY: No CONSULTANT:Marie Liu
SUBJECT: Tamarisk plant control.
Summary: Assembly Bill 984 would authorize the
Department of Water Resources (DWR), in collaboration with
the federal government and other specified entities, to
prepare a plan to control or eradicate tamarisk in the
Colorado River watershed and to reestablish native
vegetation.
Existing Law: Currently, the DWR, as one of its
responsibilities, is required to support local projects
that improve the efficiency of the use of surface and
groundwater resources and to restore and enhance
environmental resources values.
The multi-agency Colorado River Board was established in
Division 6, Part 5 of the Water Code (commencing with
Section 12500) to protect the state's rights and interests
in the resources of the Colorado River. The board consists
of eight board members, including the director of DWR.
Proposed Law: AB 984 makes legislative findings on the
problems related to tamarisk growth in the Colorado River
watershed. The bill would authorize the Department of Water
Resources (DWR) to collaborate with the federal government
and the other Colorado Basin states to prepare a plan to
control or eradicate tamarisk in the Colorado River
watershed within California. To develop the plan, DWR must
collaborate with the Department of Food and Agriculture,
the Department of Fish and Game, and the Colorado River
Board of California. The plan must include the
reestablishment of native vegetation and must identify
potential funding sources for implementation.
DWR is not required to implement the plan until funds for
this purpose are appropriated. When the plan is
implemented, DWR is also required to collaborate with
affected California water agencies and other appropriate
entities.
Arguments in Support: The author points to an estimated
210,000-460,000 acre-feet of water that is lost every year
due to the transpiration of tamarisk on the Colorado River.
Additionally, the author states: "This fast growing
invasive plant easily displaces native species and creates
a monoculture where almost everything is tamarisk?Tamarisk
has almost no habitat value."
In their support letter of support, the Trust for Public
Land states, "Unfortunately, the presence of tamarisk is
pervasive through the Colorado River watershed. Its
existence has had negative consequences for the river, most
notably the outstripping of native vegetation, and
overconsumption of the already precious and dwindling water
supplies of the river."
Arguments in Opposition: None received.
Comments: Impacts of tamarisk: Tamarisk is an aggressively
invasive woody plant that has established itself over
millions of acres of riparian areas in the western United
States, including along the Colorado River. In addition to
the undesirable impacts of tamarisk discussed by the
author, the plant also increases the salinity of
surrounding soil and may make the area more prone to catch
fire. Successful eradiation and revegetation efforts have
been conducted in parts of the Coachella Valley and the
Grand Canyon.
Previous legislation : This bill is very similar to AB 1466,
which passed the committee last year. The Governor agreed
with the intent of AB 1466, but ultimately vetoed the bill,
citing his belief that the legislation should, "provide
authority and direction for the appropriate state entities
to work with the other Colorado Lower Basin States, the
federal government, and local water districts receiving
water out of the Colorado Water." AB 984 provides this
authority and direction.
SUPPORT:
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Municipal Water District of Orange County
San Diego County Water Authority
Sierra Club California
Southern California Water Committee, Inc.
The Trust for Public Land
OPPOSITION:
None received