BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1261|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1261
          Author:   Leno (D)
          Amended:  8/15/05 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  : 12-0, 6/15/05
          AYES:  Scott, Maldonado, Alquist, Denham, Dutton,  
            Lowenthal, Morrow, Romero, Simitian, Soto, Speier,  
            Torlakson

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 06/28/05
          AYES:  Dunn, Morrow, Ackerman, Cedillo, Figueroa, Kuehl
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Escutia

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  74-0, 5/19/05 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Foster children:  education

           SOURCE  :     Children's Law Center of Los Angeles


           DIGEST  :    This bill clarifies and cleans up the provisions  
          of AB 490 (Steinberg), Chapter 862, Statutes of 2003,  
          addressing the educational needs of children in the foster  
          care system.  It also reinstates language that was  
          inadvertently chaptered out of AB 1858 (Steinberg), Chapter  
          914, Statutes of 2004, by SB 722 (McPherson), Chapter 915,  
          Statutes of 2004.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1261
                                                                Page  
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    Current law requires county offices of  
          education to make available information on educational  
          options for children residing in licensed children's  
          institutions to agencies placing children in licensed  
          children's institutions.  Every agency that places a child  
          in a licensed children's institution is required to notify  
          the local education agency (LEA) at the time of the  
          placement, and the LEA is required to have a designated  
          staff person as the educational liaison for foster youth.   
          A pupil placed in a licensed children's institution or  
          foster family home is required to attend programs operated  
          by the LEA, except as specified.  If a school placement  
          dispute arises, a foster youth has the right to remain in  
          the school that the foster child attended when permanently  
          housed or the school in which the foster child was last  
          enrolled.

          Existing law sets forth the circumstances under which a  
          minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile  
          court and establishes procedures to determine temporary  
          placement of a dependent child.  A juvenile court may limit  
          the right of a parent or guardian to make educational  
          decisions for his or her child that is adjudged a dependent  
          of the court and at the same time the court may appoint a  
          responsible adult to make educational decisions for the  
          child.

          This bill makes changes to the provisions related to the  
          education of foster youth, as follows:

          1.Requires LEAs to implement a dispute resolution process  
            relating to the placement of foster children, and  
            provides a written explanation of the school's decisions  
            relating to placement or enrollment.  To the extent this  
            imposes additional duties on LEAs, the bill creates a  
            state mandated local program.

          2.Revises the circumstances under which a student placed in  
            a licensed children's institute or foster family home  
            attends programs operated by a LEA.

          3.Defines "pupil in foster care" for the purpose of  
            coordinating between the LEA and placement agency for the  
            proper transfer between schools of pupils in foster care.







                                                               AB 1261
                                                                Page  
          3


          4.Add nonpublic, nonsectarian schools to the list of  
            schools for which development of an alternative  
            accountability system is required.

          5.Provides that if an applicant does not receive a response  
            on a renewal application from the LEA within specified  
            time periods, the applicant may file the application with  
            the Superintendent of Public Instruction.

          6.Authorizes the court to temporarily limit the right of  
            the parent to make educational decisions for the child  
            and to temporarily appoint a responsible adult to make  
            education decisions for the child if specified conditions  
            are found.

          7.Authorizes the court to make educational decisions for  
            the child if the court cannot identify a responsible  
            adult to make educational decisions for the child, the  
            appointment of a surrogate parent is not warranted, there  
            is o foster parent to exercise the appropriate authority,  
            and to issue appropriate orders to ensure that every  
            effort is made to identify a responsible adult to make  
            future educational decisions for the child.

          8.Requires county welfare departments, at any hearing to  
            terminate jurisdiction over a dependent child who has  
            reached the age of majority to include a health and  
            education summary in a specified report.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          Requiring school districts to have in place a process to  
          resolve disputes relating to a licensed children's  
          institute or nonsectarian schools placement of a student  
          and to provide a written explanation of the decision where  
          the parent disputes the decision will result in new mandate  
          costs.  If the cost of a dispute resolution is $500 and  
          there are 200 per year, costs will be $100,000 annually.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/16/05)

          Children's Law Center of Los Angeles (source)







                                                               AB 1261
                                                                Page  
          4

          National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter
          Juvenile Court Judges of California
          California Coalition for Youth
          Family Law Section of the State Bar of California
          National Center for Youth Law
          Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          Protection & Advocacy, Inc.
          Gay and Lesbian Adolescent Social Services, Inc.
          California Alliance of Child and Family Services


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Berg, Bermudez,  
            Blakeslee, Bogh, Canciamilla, Chan, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn,  
            Coto, Daucher, De La Torre, DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson,  
            Evans, Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Harman, Haynes, Jerome  
            Horton, Shirley Horton, Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette,  
            Keene, Klehs, Koretz, La Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno,  
            Leslie, Levine, Lieber, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy,  
            Montanez, Mountjoy, Mullin, Nakanishi, Nation, Nava,  
            Negrete McLeod, Niello, Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia,  
            Richman, Ridley-Thomas, Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Saldana,  
            Salinas, Spitzer, Strickland, Torrico, Tran, Umberg,  
            Vargas, Villines, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Nunez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Benoit, Calderon, Chavez, Garcia,  
            Gordon, Liu


          NC:cm  8/17/05   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****