BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                                 SENATE HEALTH
                               COMMITTEE ANALYSIS
                        Senator Deborah V. Ortiz, Chair


          BILL NO:       AB 2051                                      
          A
          AUTHOR:        Cohn                                         
          B
          AMENDED:       June 19, 2006
          HEARING DATE:  June 21, 2006                                
          2
          FISCAL:        Judiciary / Appropriations                   
          0
                                                                      
          5
          CONSULTANT:                                                 
          1
          Patterson / ak
                                        

                                     SUBJECT
                                         
                               Domestic violence

                                     SUMMARY  

          This bill expands education and training requirements to  
          include lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)  
          domestic violence (DV) issues.  

                                     ABSTRACT

           Existing law:  
          1.Allows two persons, who are either of the same sex, or  
            persons of opposite sexes where one or both is over 62,  
            to become domestic partners by filing a declaration with  
            the Secretary of State (SOS).  Requires the SOS, by  
            regulation, to establish and charge fees to registrants  
            based on the actual costs, currently set at $10, and to  
            return a certificate of registration to registered  
            domestic partners.

          2.Requires the California Department of Health Services  
            (DHS) to administer grants to support battered women's  
            shelters to provide emergency shelter for women and their  
                                                         Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          2


          

            children escaping family violence.  Creates, until  
            January 1, 2010, an advisory council to consult with DHS  
            regarding the funding program, consisting of, among  
            others, DV advocates, battered women service providers  
            and law enforcement.

          3.Requires DHS to distribute brochures that contain  
            DV-related information to county clerks who shall provide  
            the brochures to marriage license applicants.

          4.Requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and  
            Training (POST) to implement a training program on the  
            handling of DV complaints for law enforcement officers in  
            California and to consult with various groups on  
            development of the program.

          5.Requires the Office of Emergency Services (OES) to  
            provide assistance to local DV centers through a grant  
            program, to develop and disseminate information and  
            materials relating to DV, and to conduct statewide  
            training workshops on DV.  

          This bill:  
          1.Establishes a $23 fee to be charged to persons filing  
            domestic partner registrations in order to support the  
            development of an LGBT curriculum for training workshops  
            on DV and a mini-grant program to promote healthy,  
            non-violent relationships in the LGBT community.   
            Establishes the Equality in Prevention and Services  
            Domestic Abuse Fund to be administered by OES and into  
            which the fee shall be deposited.

          2.Requires the SOS to print and distribute an LGBT-specific  
            domestic abuse brochure to LGBT domestic partnership  
            registrants as funding allows.

          3.Requires DHS to provide existing brochures that contain  
            information on DV to the SOS for distribution to persons  
            qualifying as same-sex domestic partners.

          4.Requires the advisory council established to consult with  
            DHS regarding the Maternal and Child Health Branch (MCAH)  
            grants to battered women's shelters to include  
            individuals with a background and expertise in LGBT DV.
                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          3


          


          5.Requires POST to include adequate instruction on the  
            nature and extent of DV in the LGBT community in training  
            program required for law enforcement officers.

          6.Requires OES to include a curriculum component on LGBT  
            domestic abuse issues in their statewide training DV  
            workshops.

          7.Requires that the OES DV Advisory Council have at least  
            one representative of DV service providers serving the  
            LGBT community.

          8.Requires OES to develop a mini-grant program to  
            non-profit organizations that provide specified DV  
            programs and services to the LGBT community, outlines the  
            grant funding and distribution process, and establishes a  
            gender-neutral definition of DV for the purposes of the  
            mini-grant program.

                                  FISCAL IMPACT  

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, there  
          would be:
          1.Annual increased fee revenues, for domestic partnership  
            registrations, of about $140,000 based on about 6,000 new  
            registrations annually. 

          2.One-time costs of around $50,000 for the SOS to establish  
            the new fee collection process for same-sex domestic  
            partner registrants. 

          3.Absorbable costs to POST to incorporate LGBT-related DV  
            into the existing DV training program and for the  
            additional law enforcement training.

          4.One-time costs of around $50,000 for OES to develop  
            curriculum on LGBT DV for its training workshops. 

          5.Costs to OES for developing and administering the new  
            grant program and providing grants are unknown.  

          6.Costs to DHS to distribute brochures to SOS are unknown.

                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          4


          

                            BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION  

          Need for the bill  
          According to the author, this bill will ensure that LGBT  
          victims of intimate partner abuse have access to culturally  
          appropriate education and services that encourage them to  
          break the cycle of violence.  In April 2005, DHS surveyed  
          the current capacity of California shelters to provide  
          culturally competent care and identified the LGBT community  
          as an underserved and unserved population.  Even when DHS  
          has evidence of the need for services in the LGBT community  
          and has dedicated funding for this purpose, its programs  
          are still designed primarily to serve battered women and  
          their children.  From a community perspective, many LGBT  
          victims are afraid to access  shelter services for fear of  
          "outing" themselves or being further harmed by service  
          providers who lack the  understanding and sensitivity to  
          meet their needs.  Gay male and transgender victims may  
          feel particularly uncomfortable at a women's shelter.  

          LGBT victims of DV are much more likely to seek safe havens  
          at community centers and organizations that cater directly  
          to the LGBT community.  In addition, law enforcement, DV  
          shelters and other providers require better training to  
          serve LGBT victims, especially in parts of the state that  
          do not have LGBT-specific organizations.  

          The author states that there is no government source that  
          systematically reports LGBT DV and statistics on the rate  
          of abuse in the LGBT community.  However, a number of  
          studies have reviewed the prevalence of DV in the gay and  
          lesbian community.  While there are not sufficient data on  
          which to draw firm conclusions, it appears that the  
          prevalence of DV in gay and lesbian relationships is  
          comparable to the prevalence in heterosexual relationships.  
           (Gregory Merrill and Valerie Wolfe, Battered Gay Men:  An  
          Exploration of Abuse, Help Seeking, and Why They Stay,  
          Journal of Homosexuality (2000).)  According to information  
          provided by the author, while it is believed that most of  
          the DV in opposite sex couple is committed by men against  
          women, it appears that about half of the abuse in the gay  
          and lesbian community occurs in lesbian relationships and  
          about half in gay relationships.

                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          5


          

          The author states that there are almost no organizations  
          throughout the nation that provide services specifically  
          for LGBT victims of DV.  Moreover, law enforcement and  
          health care workers are usually not specifically trained to  
          deal with LGBT abuse and, as a result, victims do not  
          necessarily receive appropriate services as compared with  
          heterosexual victims.  
          
          DV in the LGBT community
          According to the National Gay Lesbian Taskforce, there are  
          many additional barriers to addressing DV in the LGBT  
          community because it is generally considered to be an issue  
          faced only by heterosexual women.  While LGBT DV may be as  
          prevalent as heterosexual DV, resources services and  
          education on LGBT DV are not easily obtainable.

          The Taskforce cites studies of lesbian couples which found  
          that 22 to 46 percent of lesbians have been in physically  
          violent same-sex relationships.  In 1997, the Gay Men's DV  
          Project conducted a survey of over 2,000 men in Boston and  
          found that 25 percent had experience DV.  The Taskforce  
          cites a survey of 12 service organizations nationwide that  
          yielded 4,048 reported cases of LGBT DV in 2000.  The  
          Taskforce asserts that this number likely represents a  
          small portion of actual cases nationwide. 

          The National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP)  
          reports that sometimes LGBT DV victims are inappropriately  
          arrested in cases where they are physically larger or  
          perceived as stronger than the assailant.  The organization  
          states that survivors of same-sex abuse often confront  
          ignorance and/or prejudice in treatment from medical  
          providers, DV specialists, law enforcement and other  
          service providers who may lack training in the unique  
          challenges faced by LGBT victims.  Furthermore, gay men  
          have difficulties finding DV service and shelters which  
          have traditionally been available only to battered women.

          In 2003, the NCAVP issued a report stating that there were  
          6,523 cases of DV documented by programs from throughout  
          the nation.  This number represented a 13 percent increase  
          from 5,718 cases recorded in 2002 by the same agencies.   
          The cases included six DV-related deaths.  Of the victims  
          in the report for whom race was known, 44 percent were  
                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          6


          

          white, 25 percent Latino/a, 15 percent of African American,  
          5 percent Asian/Pacific Islander and 4 percent reported as  
          multiracial.  Additionally there was a 54 percent increase  
          in reports from victims under the age of 30.
          
          Registration fee for domestic partners
          This bill would create a $23 fee for persons registering as  
          domestic partners.  It mirrors the $23 fee opposite-sex  
          couples pay for a marriage that is used to fund programs  
          designed to mitigate and prevent DV.  The fee created under  
          this bill would be deposited in the newly established  
          Equality in Prevention and Services for Domestic Abuse Fund  
          which would be administered by OES.  The funds would be  
          used for the development and support of an LGBT curriculum  
          for training on DV within OES which currently conducts  
          statewide training workshops on DV for local centers, law  
          enforcement, and other DV service providers.
            
          The bill declares legislative intent for OES to increase  
          access to culturally appropriate DV education, prevention,  
          and services for the LGBT community.  As such, the funds  
          would also be used to support a mini-grant program,  
          administered by OES, to promote healthy non-violent  
          relationships in the LGBT community.  The bill states that  
          OES would award at least four mini-grants of up to $10,000  
          each to qualifying organizations that fund DV programs and  
          services such as crisis hotlines, counseling, court and  
          social service advocacy, and emergency housing.

          Only non-profit organizations that have a demonstrated  
          history of working in the area of DV education and  
          prevention and serving the LGBT community would be eligible  
          for the mini-grants.  The bill also outlines the funding  
          process by which mini-grants would be awarded to qualifying  
          organizations, including a competitive request for proposal  
          process, and criteria that OES would use to evaluate  
          mini-grant proposals such as whether the funded program  
          would reach a significant number of LGBT individuals, and  
          whether the funded program would be grounded in a firm  
          understanding of LGBT DV issues.  Mini-grant funds could  
          not be used for items such as out-of-state travel,  
          fundraising activities and others.

          For the purposes of the mini-grant, the bill would define  
                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          7


          

          DV as the infliction or threat of physical harm against  
          past or present adult or adolescent intimate partners,  
          including physical, sexual and psychological abuse against  
          the person, and is a part of a pattern of assaultive,  
          coercive and controlling behaviors directed at achieving  
          compliance from or control over that person.  Whereas in  
          other areas of the law definitions of DV may relate to  
          battered women in opposite-sex relationships, this bill  
          would create a gender-neutral definition of DV for the  
          mini-grant program.

          Brochures
          Under existing law, applicants for a domestic partnership  
          must submit a Declaration of Domestic Partnership to the  
          SOS.  Upon qualification of a domestic partnership, the SOS  
          sends the qualified registrants a copy of the Declaration  
          of Domestic Partnership and a Certificate of Registered  
          Domestic Partnership.  This bill would require the SOS to  
          provide an LGBT-specific DV brochure to individuals who  
          qualify for a domestic partnership as a same-sex couple.   
          The SOS would be responsible for printing and distributing  
          the brochure, as funding allows, to qualified domestic  
          partnership registrants at the same time as sending the  
          copy of the Declaration of Domestic Partnership and  
          Certificate of Registered Domestic Partnership.  

          Additionally, existing law requires DHS to prepare and  
          publish a brochure containing information about genetic  
          defects and diseases, acquired immune deficiency syndrome  
          (AIDS), and information concerning DV including a statement  
          that DV is against the law and resources where victims can  
          seek assistance.  DHS is responsible for distributing this  
          brochure to county clerks who are required to give the  
          brochure to each applicant for a marriage license.  This  
          bill would require DHS to also make this brochure available  
          to the SOS who shall then distribute it to qualifying  
          same-sex domestic partnership registrants at the same time  
          as sending the copy of the Declaration of Domestic  
          Partnership and Certificate of Registered Domestic  
          Partnership.

          Advisory councils
          Existing law requires the MCAH within DHS to administer a  
          comprehensive grant program to battered women's shelters.   
                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          8


          

          In implementing the grant program, DHS is required to  
          consult with an advisory council that is comprised of up to  
          15 members appointed by the Governor, Speaker of the  
          Assembly, or the Senate Rules Committee.  The membership of  
          this council shall consist of DV advocates, battered women  
          service providers, and representatives of women's  
          organizations, law enforcement and other DV groups.

          AB 2051 would require that at least one representative of  
          service providers serving the LGBT community for DV  
          purposes serve on the advisory council.  It appears as  
          though this provision is consistent with the law's  
          expressed intent of the Legislature that the council  
          membership reflects the state's diversity.  To that end,  
          the bill also declares that it is the intent of the  
          Legislature that services funded by the grant program  
          include services for battered women in underserved  
          communities, including the LGBT community.

          Lastly, existing law provides for the OES Domestic Violence  
          Advisory Council which consists of experts in the provision  
          of direct or intervention services to battered women and  
          their children.  The Council is similar to the  
          abovementioned advisory council that consults with the MCAH  
          in that it is comprised of up to 15 members appointed by  
          the Governor, Speaker of the Assembly, or the Senate Rules  
          Committee and must consist of DV victims' advocates,  
          battered women services providers and representatives of  
          women's organizations, law enforcement, and other groups  
          involved with DV.  This bill would require that at least  
          one representative of LGBT DV service providers serve on  
          the advisory council.  

          Law enforcement training
          Current law requires POST to implement a training program  
          on the handling of DV complaints for law enforcement  
          officers in California and consult with various groups on  
          development of the program.  This bill requires that the  
          training include adequate instruction on the nature and  
          extent of DV in the LGBT community and that the Commission,  
          when developing the course of instruction for the training  
          program, consult with, among others, individuals with an  
          interest and expertise in LGBT DV. 
          
                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          9


          

          Arguments in support
          Supporters state that this bill will support a number of  
          initiatives to address the problems of DV among same-sex  
          partners, and will provide educational brochures specific  
          to LGBT DV, grants to support organizations that serve LGBT  
          DV victims, and LGBT DV training to law enforcement and DV  
          service providers.  This bill takes the first critical  
          steps to implement efforts to increase public knowledge  
          about LGBT DV victims and explore ways to better serve  
          them.

          Arguments in opposition 
          All of the registered opponents to this bill have taken an  
          oppose unless amended position.

          The California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson has taken  
          an opposed unless amended position on this bill stating  
          that it will more than triple the current cost for  
          registering a domestic partnership which is far too  
          excessive.  Secretary McPherson suggests that the bill be  
          amended to require DHS to develop a brochure informing  
          people of domestic abuse that may be faced by any  
          registered domestic partner and to provide this brochure to  
          the SOS who would distribute the brochure to each new  
          registrant upon the submission of their application.  With  
          this amendment, the Secretary McPherson states that the  
          production of this brochure should not warrant any fee  
          increase for the registration of a domestic partnership.   
          It should be noted that Secretary McPherson registered his  
          position on April 13, 2006 and also opposed provisions in  
          the bill that would have required opposite-sex domestic  
          partnership registrants to pay the bill's proposed $23 fee.  


          The remaining organizations and individuals who have taken  
          an oppose unless amended position state that men comprise a  
          large number of DV victims, and that research shows that  
          violence in intimate relationships is reciprocal and not  
          unilateral violence against women.  By focusing uniquely on  
          female victims, the bill is expressly discriminatory  
          against men.  These organizations suggest amending the bill  
          so as to assure that benefits and services are provided to  
          all DV victims, including heterosexual males.

                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          10


          

          The Family Violence Treatment and Education Association  
          submitted proposed amendments to the bill that appear to  
          make the bill gender-neutral and expand its provisions to  
          heterosexual males and females.  
          
                              COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS
           
          1.Registration Fee.  It is unclear if intent of the author  
            is to create a $23 domestic partnership registration fee  
            that is in addition to or inclusive of the $10 fee  
            applicants currently pay.  If this bill were passed,  
            would the new fee be $23 or $33?  To clarify this, the  
            author may wish to amend the bill to state whether or not  
            the $23 fee is in addition to or inclusive of existing  
            registration fees.

          2.Entity responsible for creating the brochure.  The bill  
            requires the SOS to print and distribute an LGBT-specific  
            DV brochure, but does not state what entity is  
            responsible for creating the brochure.  Does the author  
            intend for the SOS to develop the brochure?  

          3.Distribution of brochure.  The bill states that the SOS  
            would be required to print and distribute the  
            LGBT-specific brochure as funds allow, and also requires  
            the SOS to distribute the non-LGBT-specific brochure  
            published by DHS.  If funds become available for the SOS  
            to print and distribute the LGBT-specific brochure, the  
            language could be interpreted that the SOS would be  
            required to distribute both brochures.  Does the author  
            intend for the SOS to distribute the DHS brochure until  
            or unless funds become available to distribute the  
            LGBT-specific brochure? 

          4.Drafting error.  Section 9 of the bill begins with a  
            reference to Section 13823.17 of the Family Code.  This  
            is a drafting error, and should refer to the Penal Code,  
            not the Family Code.

                                  PRIOR ACTIONS

           Assembly Floor:          49 - 29  Pass
          Assembly Appropriations: 13 -   5  Do Pass as Amended
          Assembly Public Safety:    4 -   2  Do Pass
                                                           
          Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2051 (Cohn)           Page  
          11


          

          Assembly Judiciary:        6 -   2  Do Pass as Amended










































                                                           
          Continued---









                                    POSITIONS  
                                        
          Support:    Equality California (sponsor)
                      California State Controller Steve Westly
                      City of West Hollywood
                      Community United Against Violence
                      Gay and Lesbian Alliance of the Central Coast
                                Junior Leagues of California State  
                                                                     Public Affairs Committee
                      San Diego LGBT Community center

          Oppose:     California Alliance for Families and Children 
          (unless     California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson
          amended)    Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women 
                                Family Non-Violence, Inc. 
                                Family Violence Treatment and  
               Education Association 
                                Forensic Psychiatric Services  
               Commission 
                                Grant Joint Union High School  
                         District Adult Education Domestic 
                                    Violence Batterer's Treatment  
                         Program 
                                Life Change Counseling 
                                Peace Creations 
                                Safe Homes for Children and Families  
               Coalition
                      Simon Fraser University 
                      University of Massachusetts Lowell 
                                Two individuals 


                                   -- END --
          











                                                         Continued---