BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1212|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1212
          Author:   Torlakson (D), et al
          Amended:  8/10/06
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE  :  3-2,04/25/06
          AYES:  Alquist, Chesbro, Romero
          NOES:  Maldonado, Aanestad

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  22-14, 5/25/06
          AYES:  Alarcon, Alquist, Cedillo, Chesbro, Dunn, Escutia,  
            Figueroa, Florez, Kuehl, Lowenthal, Machado, Migden,  
            Murray, Ortiz, Perata, Romero, Scott, Simitian, Soto,  
            Speier, Torlakson, Vincent
          NOES:  Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Battin, Cox, Denham,  
            Ducheny, Dutton, Hollingsworth, Margett, McClintock,  
            Morrow, Poochigian, Runner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bowen, Kehoe, Maldonado, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/23/06 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Continuing care retirement communities:   
          advisory 
                      committee member

           SOURCE  :     California Continuing Care Residents  
          Association


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1212
                                                                Page  
          2

           DIGEST  :    This bill makes changes to rules governing  
          Continuing Care Retirement Communities involving disclosure  
          of reserves, transfer procedures, and escrow deposits for  
          new construction.

           Assembly Amendments  reduced the percentage of each  
          depositor's applicable entrance fee required to be placed  
          into escrow by an applicant from 20 percent to 10 percent,  
          required that a continuing care contract contain specified  
          provisions, deleted a section related to the Continuing  
          Care Advisory Committee, and clarified provisions regarding  
          funds.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing Law

           1.Provides for the regulation by the Department of Social  
            Services (DSS) activities relating to continuing care  
            contracts that govern care provided to an elderly  
            resident in a continuing care retirement community for  
            the duration of the resident's life or a term in excess  
            of one year.

          2.Designates the contents of a continuing care contract,  
            including the conditions under which a resident of a  
            continuing care retirement community (CCRC) may be  
            voluntarily or involuntarily transferred from his or her  
            designated living unit.

          3.Requires that each CCRC provider submit an annual report  
            of its financial condition, including full details on the  
            status of reserves and on per capita costs of operation  
            for each CCRC operated.

          4.Requires that at least 20 percent of the entrance fees  
            for 50 percent of the units of any proposed construction  
            of a new CCRC or added units to an existing CCRC be  
            deposited in an escrow account as a condition of approval  
            of the construction by DSS, and allows release of the  
            escrowed deposits only after construction is at least 50  
            percent complete.

          This bill:

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1212
                                                                Page  
          3


          1.Clarifies the requirement that transfer of a resident  
            from a designated living unit under specified conditions  
            is permissive and not mandatory.

          2.Requires that any statement in a CCRC contract concerning  
            an ownership interest appear in a large-sized font or  
            print.

          3.Clarifies that details of reserves in the provider's  
            annual report include a description and amount of all  
            reserves currently designated and maintained.

          4.Requires that the provider's annual report disclose funds  
            accumulated for identified projects or purposes and any  
            funds maintained or designated for specific  
            contingencies, but the requirement is not to be construed  
            to mandate the accumulation of funding of contingencies  
            nor to alter existing law regarding reserves required to  
            be maintained.

          5.Reduces by half the amount of entrance fee deposits that  
            applicants for construction of a new CCRC or additional  
            units must place in escrow to obtain approval to proceed  
            with a project.

           Prior Legislation

           According to the Senate Human Services Committee analysis,  
          a number of bills have been enacted over the past decade  
          designed to ensure access to relevant information for  
          prospective residents as well as on-going residents of  
          CCRCs.  The immediate last two bills enacted illustrate the  
          Legislature's interest in this subject.  AB 2550  
          (Steinberg), Chapter 129, Statutes of 2004, added to the  
          existing law requiring providers to maintain qualifying  
          assets as a liquid reserve in an amount equal to or  
          exceeding the amount required for debt service plus the  
          operating reserve to increase the operating reserve  
          required from 45 to 75 days net operating expenses.  This  
          bill also required those CCRCs containing up-front entrance  
          fees, unlimited health-related services, and little to no  
          increases in monthly charges to submit studies to the state  
          every five years documenting that the facility continued to  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1212
                                                                Page  
          4

          operate in actuarial balance.  Finally, it required all  
          CCRC providers to annually file a "Key Indicator Report"  
          containing financial ratios, occupancy rates and liquidity  
          indicators.

          Last year SB 244 (Romero), Chapter 454, Statutes of 2005,  
          focused on the rights of residents by adding the specific  
          rights already afforded those seniors who reside in  
          residential care homes for the elderly, and protected CCRC  
          residents from undue pressure from providers for donations  
          or other purchases as a condition of entry into a CCRC.  It  
          also assured more freedom and a broader set of issues to  
          CCRC resident organizations, allowed for residents to  
          complain to DSS if certain rights were violated and it drew  
          explicit parameters and due process around a provider's  
          ability to move residents within the community.  It also  
          required a series of statements added to the contract to  
          disclose billing practices, timelines and procedures.  
           
           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          analysis, costs associated with this bill should be minor  
          and absorbable.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/23/06)

          California Continuing Care Residents Association (source)
          AARP
          American Baptist Homes of the West
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          Association of California Resource Centers 
          California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform
          California Alliance for Retired Americans
          California Alliance for Direct Support Professionals
          California Association of Homes and Services for the Aging   

          California Caregiver Resource Centers
          California Continuing Care Residents Association 
          California Long Term Care Ombudsman Association
          Erickson Retirement Communities
          Front Porch

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1212
                                                                Page  
          5

          Gray Panthers
          Jewish Home of San Francisco
          Masonic Homes of California
          National Association of Social Workers 
          Older Women's League of California 
          St. Paul's Senior Homes and Services

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          "Considering their significant financial interest, it is  
          important in the oversights of CCRCs that resident voices  
          receive appropriate attention.  It is also important that  
          transparency and accountability be the foundation of  
          provider communication with residents on financial  
          matters."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Bass, Benoit, Berg,  
            Bermudez, Blakeslee, Bogh, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan,  
            Chavez, Chu, Cogdill, Cohn, Coto, Daucher, De La Torre,  
            DeVore, Dymally, Emmerson, Evans, Frommer, Garcia,  
            Goldberg, Hancock, Haynes, Jerome Horton, Shirley Horton,  
            Houston, Huff, Jones, Karnette, Keene, Klehs, Koretz, La  
            Malfa, La Suer, Laird, Leno, Leslie, Levine, Lieber,  
            Lieu, Liu, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy, Montanez, Mountjoy,  
            Mullin, Nakanishi, Nation, Nava, Negrete McLeod, Niello,  
            Oropeza, Parra, Pavley, Plescia, Richman, Ridley-Thomas,  
            Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Saldana, Salinas, Spitzer,  
            Strickland, Torrico, Tran, Vargas, Villines, Walters,  
            Wolk, Wyland, Yee, Nunez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Umberg, Vacancy


          CTW:cm  8/27/06   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****







                                                           CONTINUED