BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1773
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1773 (Alarcon)
          As Amended August 9, 2006
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :24-11  
          
           HEALTH              9-3         PUBLIC SAFETY       4-2         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chan, Berg, Cohn,         |Ayes:|Leno , Dymally, Goldberg, |
          |     |Dymally, Frommer, Lieu,   |     |Lieber                    |
          |     |Montanez, Nakanishi,      |     |                          |
          |     |Ridley-Thomas             |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Aghazarian, Richman,      |Nays:|La Suer, Spitzer          |
          |     |Strickland                |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      13-5                                        
           
           -------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Chu, Bass, Berg,          |
          |     |Calderon,                 |
          |     |De La Torre, Karnette,    |
          |     |Klehs, Leno, Nation,      |
          |     |Laird, Ridley-Thomas,     |
          |     |Saldana, Yee              |
          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Sharon Runner, Emmerson,  |
          |     |Haynes, Nakanishi,        |
          |     |Walters                   |
          |     |                          |
           -------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes counties to elect to levy an additional $2  
          for every $10 in base fines for purposes of supporting emergency  
          medical services (EMS), and requires the additional assessment  
          to be deposited in local Maddy EMS Funds, with 15% to be  
          directed to pediatric trauma services.  Authorizes up to 10% to  
          be used for administrative expenses and sunsets the provisions  
          of this bill on January 1, 2009.  Specifically,  this bill  :   









                                                                  SB 1773
                                                                  Page  2


          1)Authorizes, for purposes of supporting EMS, as specified, a  
            county board of supervisors to elect to levy an additional  
            penalty of $2 for every $10 or fraction thereof, which is to  
            be collected together with and in the same manner as existing  
            assessments, as specified, upon every fine, penalty, or  
            forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for certain  
            criminal and vehicle code violations.

          2)Requires funds to be collected pursuant to #1) above only if  
            the county board of supervisors provides that the increased  
            penalties do not offset or reduce the funding of other  
            programs from other sources, but that these additional  
            revenues result in increased funding to those programs, and be  
            deposited into the Maddy EMS Fund, as specified.

          3)Requires 15% of the money deposited in the Maddy EMS Fund  
            pursuant to #1) above to be used to provide funding for  
            publicly and privately owned and operated pediatric trauma  
            centers through out the county.  Limits expenditure of this  
            money to reimbursement to physicians and surgeons, hospitals  
            for patients who do not make payment for services, or for  
            expanding the services provided at pediatric trauma centers,  
            including the purchase of equipment.  

          4)Requires counties that do not maintain pediatric trauma  
            centers to use the pediatric trauma money deposited into the  
            Maddy EMS Fund to improve access to pediatric trauma and  
            emergency services in the county, with preference for funding  
            given to hospitals that specialize in services to children,  
            and physicians and surgeons who provide care for children.   
            Refers to funds spent for these purposes to be known as  
            "Richie's Fund."

          5)Requires costs of administering money deposited into the Maddy  
            EMS Fund pursuant to #3) above to be reimbursed from the money  
            collected, not to exceed 10%.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee: 

          1)Increased revenue for emergency medical services for the  
            duration of this bill, depending upon county decisions and the  
            amounts collected, potentially in the tens of millions of  
            dollars annually, to the extent that judges do not reduce base  








                                                                  SB 1773
                                                                  Page  3


            fines and offenders do not opt for jail time in lieu of the  
            increased fines.  Based on state revenue amounts received from  
            existing penalty assessments, if all counties levied a $2  
            increase, their total additional revenue would be  
            approximately $45 million.

          2)Indeterminate state revenue loss, potentially in excess of  
            $150,000 General Fund (GF), to the extent that offenders elect  
            jail time or community service in lieu of paying increased  
            fines, or if judges use their discretion to reduce base fines  
            as a result of the penalty assessment increase authorized by  
            this bill.  Either of these scenarios would affect existing  
            state entities funded through state penalty assessments.  Data  
            regarding the extent to which judges use their discretion to  
            reduce base fines and the number of offenders who serve jail  
            time or perform community service in lieu of paying fines is  
            not collected by the state, so the extent of state revenue  
            loss resulting from a local penalty assessment increase is  
            difficult to estimate.  However, because the state received  
            $231 million in state penalty assessment revenue on a cash  
            basis in 2004-05, a small percentage decrease of .5% in state  
            penalty assessment revenue would result in a state revenue  
            loss of $1.2 million.  This bill requires that funds be  
            collected under this bill only if the county board of  
            supervisors provides that the increased penalties do not  
            offset or reduce the funding of other programs from other  
            sources, and that these additional revenues result in  
            increased funding to those programs. 

          3)One-time non-reimbursable minor increased General Fund costs  
            (Trial Court Trust Fund) to counties electing to implement an  
            additional penalty assessment for accounting and programming  
            changes, staff training, and revisions to forms.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, many hospitals throughout  
          California suffer from funding shortages.  As a result,  
          hospitals are not prepared to adequately serve the patients in  
          their area and are often forced to close their doors.  Many of  
          these hospitals offer trauma care services that are essential to  
          saving the lives of patients who without them would have no  
          choice but to go elsewhere for services.  Currently trauma  
          centers face a $635 million dollar shortfall.  The author states  
          that this bill seeks to generate funding to help alleviate this  
          problem.








                                                                  SB 1773
                                                                 Page  4



          Previous legislation:  SB 57 (Alarcon) of 2005 was substantially  
          similar to this bill.  SB 57 was vetoed by the Governor.  In his  
          veto message the Governor states:

               ?the addition of new fines and fees tends to reduce  
               the imposition and collection of existing penalties,  
               which are passed out on a prorated basis to the  
               various funds.  The Victim Compensation Program  
               receives a significant portion of its funding from  
               restitution fines.

               While programs seeking new or additional funding in  
               this manner might in fact be deserving or worthwhile,  
               it is simply not possible to continue adding new  
               recipients to the existing program distribution  
               without reducing funding to current deserving  
               recipients.  Local EMS funds currently receive funds  
               from penalty assessments.  In recognition of the need  
               for funding, my 2005-2006 budget contains another $10  
               million dollars in General Fund for trauma centers.   
               However, I cannot approve further attachment of this  
               source of funding at the expense of victims and others  
               who are likely to lose precious funding from this  
               source if SB 57 were to become law.

          The sponsor of this bill, the American College of Emergency  
          Physicians State Chapter of California, Inc., (Cal/ACEP)  
          believes this bill could potentially raise $50 million to  
          reimburse physicians and surgeons for care given to uninsured  
          patients.   Cal/ACEP asserts that a 2004 report by the  
          California Medical Association (CMA) indicates that losses  
          sustained by hospitals and physicians in 2001-02 were over $635  
          million.  This Maddy EMS Fund becomes more vital as losses  
          continue to grow.  Cal/ACEP states that this bill will help keep  
          specialists on call to treat all patients, not just the  
          uninsured. 

          Labor organizations such as the California Labor Federation,  
          AFL-CIO, view assessments such as the one proposed in this bill  
          as a tax on their members and other workers who drive for a  
          living.  Rising fine levels, high insurance rates, and an  
          inability to attend traffic school because of recent law  
          changes, makes it difficult to except increases in assessments.   








                                                                  SB 1773
                                                                  Page  5


          The Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST)  
          shares the Governor's concern raised in his veto message on SB  
          57 about the negative impact the additional assessment may have  
          on existing recipients of the State Penalty Fund, such as Peace  
          Officers Training Fund.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Teri Boughton / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097


                                                                FN: 0016507