BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 258
                                                                  Page 1

          Date of Hearing:  April 16, 2007

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                 Loni Hancock, Chair
                   AB 258 (Krekorian) - As Amended:  April 9, 2007
           
          SUBJECT  :  Environment:  marine debris:  plastic discharges.

           SUMMARY  :  This bill establishes a plastic debris eradication  
          program to reduce the amount of preproduction plastics entering  
          the marine environment. 

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Under the Marine Plastic Pollution Research and Control Act of  
            1987 (Public Law 100-220, Title II), prohibits the at-sea  
            disposal of plastic and other solid materials for all  
            navigable waters within the United States.  The law also  
            requires the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the  
            National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the US  
            Coast Guard to jointly conduct a public education program on  
            the marine environment.

          2)Requires USEPA to develop a National Marine Debris Monitoring  
            Program designed to assess the effectiveness of the current  
            national marine debris legislation.  Monitoring under this  
            program takes place at designated beaches every 28 days.

          3)Under the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter  
            Reduction Act of 1986 (commencing with Public Resources Code  
            Section 14500), provides funding and education programs to  
            reduce beverage container litter.

          4)Under the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Act)  
            (commencing with Public Resources Code Section 40000),  
            requires cities and counties to divert 50 percent of their  
            solid waste by 2000.  The Act provides various programs to  
            reduce litter and educate consumers about the importance of  
            recycling.

          5)Under the federal Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. Section  
            1313(d)(1)], requires the state to identify a list of impaired  
            water-bodies and develop and implement Total Maximum Daily  
            Loads (TMDLs) for impaired water bodies.









                                                                  AB 258
                                                                  Page 2

          6)Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (commencing  
            with Water Code Section 13000), regulates discharges of  
            pollutants in storm-water and urban runoff by regulating,  
            through the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System  
            (NPDES), industrial discharges and discharges through the  
            municipal storm drain systems of communities with populations  
            under 100,000 and communities with greater than 100,000 and  
            from 11 categories of industrial activity.

           THIS BILL  :

          1)Defines "preproduction plastic" as plastic pellets, plastic  
            resin products, powdered coloring for plastics, plastic  
            additives, plastic materials, and plastic fragments. 

          2)Requires the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and  
            regional water quality control boards (RWQCBs) to implement a  
            program to control discharges of preproduction plastic, which  
            shall include: 

             a)   Waste discharge, monitoring, and reporting requirements  
               for facilities that handle preproduction plastic.

             b)   Requiring plastic manufacturing, handling, and  
               transportation facilities to implement best management  
               practices (BMPs) to control discharges of preproduction  
               plastic, which shall include: 

               i)     Zero loss containment systems for storm drains; 

               ii)    Sealed containers for all preproduction plastic at  
                 all points of storage and transfer;

               iii)   Capture devices at all points of storage and  
                 transfer; and,

               iv)    Vacuum systems for the cleanup of preproduction  
                 plastic. 

          3)Clarifies that nothing in this bill limits the authority of  
            SWRCB or RWQCBs to establish requirements in addition to the  
            BMPs. 

          4)Requires SWRCB to establish criteria for the submittal of the  
            "no exposure certification" requirement for plastic  








                                                                  AB 258
                                                                  Page 3

            manufacturing and processing facilities subject to NPDES  
            permitting requirements, as follows: 

             a)   The criteria shall include specific procedures,  
               controls, and BMPs necessary to achieve zero discharge of  
               preproduction plastic from the facilities; 

             b)   The certification shall be required annually;

             c)   "No exposure" means that all industrial materials and  
               activities are protected by a storm resistant shelter;

             d)   If a facility is granted certification, the facility is  
               not required to comply with the BMPs established pursuant  
               to this bill, unless required by SWRCB or a RWQCB.  

          5)Requires SWRCB to establish a fee schedule to fund the bill's  
            requirements. 

          6)Requires SWRCB and RWQCBs to comply with the bill's  
            requirements by January 1, 2009.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.

           COMMENTS  :

         1)Background  

          According to the USEPA, marine debris has become a problem along  
          shorelines, coastal waters, estuaries, and oceans throughout the  
          world.  It is commonly defined as any man-made, solid material  
          that enters our waterways directly or indirectly.  Objects  
          ranging from detergent bottles, plastic bags, paper cups,  
          preproduction plastic, hazardous medical wastes, cigarette butts  
          and discarded fishing line all qualify as marine debris.  In  
          addition to being unsightly, it poses a serious threat to  
          everything with which it comes into contact.  Marine debris can  
          be life threatening to marine organisms and can wreak havoc on  
          coastal communities and the fishing industry.  

          In general, there are two types of marine debris that pollute  
          our ocean and coastline in California.  The first is from ocean  
          sources, and includes waste discharged by ships, recreational  
          boaters and fishermen, and offshore oil and gas exploration and  
          production facilities.  The second, and by far more  








                                                                  AB 258
                                                                  Page 4

          environmentally destructive, type of marine debris is from the  
          land.  This type of debris includes stormwater runoff, solid  
          waste, floating structures, poorly maintained garbage bins and  
          dumps and is transmitted to the marine environment by waterways.  
           Land based litter constitutes nearly 80% of the marine debris  
          found on our beaches and oceans, and 90% of it is plastic. 

          When debris from the land reaches the beaches and ocean, marine  
          life is often threatened because they confuse the debris for  
          food.  Small pieces of preproduction plastic, plastic cups,  
          bags, and cigarette filters are often found in the stomachs of  
          fish, birds, whales, and other marine creatures. 

          Recent studies by the Algalita Marine Research Foundation and  
          the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project have  
          found that the average mass of plastics in the seawater off the  
          coast of Long Beach is two and a half times greater than the  
          average mass of plankton.  After storms with excessive runoff,  
          the mass of plastics is even greater.  A similar study over  
          seawater 1,000 miles west of San Francisco found the mass of  
          plastics was six times the mass of plankton in drifts where  
          marine animals congregate for feeding on plankton.  

          According to the author's office, approximately 60 billion  
          pounds of preproduction plastic is manufactured annually in the  
          US.  These plastics are discharged into waterways during  
          transport, packaging, and processing when proper housekeeping  
          practices are not employed.  Because of their small size, these  
          materials are not generally captured through traditional storm  
          water catch basins.  

         2)Operation Clean Sweep
         
          The plastics industry attempted to address the release of  
          preproduction plastics into the marine environment by developing  
          a voluntary program called Operation Clean Sweep.  This program,  
          developed by the Society of Plastics Industry and the American  
          Plastics Council, developed BMPs to reduce discharges of  
          preproduction plastic through proper handling and cleanup.   
          Where implemented, Operation Clean Sweep has been shown to  
          reduce the release of preproduction plastic; however, the  
          program is voluntary and many plastic manufacturers and  
          processors have chosen not to implement its recommendations.  

           3)Total Maximum Daily Loads  








                                                                  AB 258
                                                                  Page 5


          According to USEPA, a TMDL is a calculation of the maximum  
          amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still  
          meet water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount  
          to the pollutant's sources.  Water quality standards are  
          established by state and identify the uses for each waterbody,  
          for example, drinking water supply, contact recreation  
          (swimming), and fishing, and the scientific criteria to support  
          that use.  A TMDL is the sum of the allowable loads of a single  
          pollutant from all contributing point and nonpoint sources.    
          One of the smaller categories of pollutants that affect TMDLs is  
          "trash TMDLs" or waterbodies that are considered to be impaired  
          due to trash.  Under a consent decree, the USEPA must establish  
          TMDLs for trash in all impaired waters in the state.  TMDLs have  
          already been established by the Los Angeles RWQCB for the Los  
          Angeles River and the Ballona Creek Watershed requiring that the  
          amount of trash be drastically reduced to protect water quality  
          and beneficial uses.   

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          Algalita Marine Research Foundation
          Baykeeper
          Californians Against Waste
          California League of Conservation Voters
          Coastkeeper Alliance
          Defenders of Wildlife
          Environment California (co-sponsor)
          John Garamendi, Lieutenant Governor (co-sponsor)
          Heal the Bay (co-sponsor)
          Newport Beach Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation
          Ocean Conservation Society
          Planning and Conservation League
          San Diego Coastkeeper (co-sponsor)
          Santa Monica Baykeeper
          Sierra Club California

           Opposition 
           
          Stop Hidden Taxes Coalition 
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :  Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916)  








                                                                  AB 258
                                                                  Page 6

          319-2092