BILL ANALYSIS AB 400 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 2, 2007 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mark Leno, Chair AB 400 (Nunez) - As Amended: April 12, 2007 Policy Committee: EducationVote:7-3 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI), beginning with the 2008-09 fiscal year (FY), to incorporate additional academic indicators into the Academic Performance Index (API). Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the following indicators to be incorporated into the API: a) High school graduation rates, as specified. b) Rates by which pupils are offered and actually complete a course of study that fulfills requirements for admission to California public institutions of postsecondary education (i.e., "A-G" requirements). c) Rates by which pupils are offered and actually complete a course of study that provides the skills and knowledge necessary to attain entry-level employment in business or industry when they graduate from high school. The measure further requires the SPI to use specified indicators to determine courses that meet this definition, including career and technical education (CTE) courses, number/percentage of pupils who earn a certificate or license in a particular occupation, scores of pupils, and workforce outcomes. 2)Requires the results of the current assessments used to calculate the API to constitute 50% of the value of the API. The bill further requires the additional indicators added by this measure to constitute the other 50% of the API. AB 400 Page 2 3)Requires the SPI to design the additional indicators (referenced above) in a manner that gives additional weight to the combined rate by which pupils satisfy "A-G" requirements and complete courses that provide entry-level skills, as specified. FISCAL EFFECT 1)General Fund (GF) administrative costs to the SPI, likely in excess of $300,000, to collect indicators regarding entry-level employment. These costs include collecting the information, coordination with other state departments, and constructing a data system that allows for the transfer of information. 2)To the extent that local education agencies do not already collect this data, there are potential, unknown GF (Proposition 98) costs, of at least $50,000, to local education agencies to collect data. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . In November 2006, UC ACCORD/UCLA IDEA projects released a report entitled Removing the Roadblocks: Fair College Opportunities for All California Students. This report provides statistics that demonstrate the lack of access poor and minority students have to an "A-G" curriculum and other resources that indicate a college-prep culture. In February 2007, the UCLA IDEA institute released a report entitled Multiple Perspectives on Multiple Pathways: Preparing CA's Youth for College, Career, and Civic Responsibility. This report attempts to bridge the divide between the following two high school curriculum debates: "A-G" and CTE. "A-G" proponents argue that the default curriculum in high schools for all students should be meeting these requirements in order for all students to be prepared to attend college. On the opposite side of the spectrum, CTE advocates argue that not all students want or will go to college and therefore, high schools need to prepare these students to graduate with employable skills. This report states that high schools must offer "multiple pathways" to students, which consist of "a range of educational options that tie formal education to work, AB 400 Page 3 community, and responsibilities of civic participation, and leadership. Each pathway offers demanding programs of academic and technical study leading to the full range of postsecondary options and career opportunities." This bill proposes to include college-preparation and CTE indicators in the API to ensure that students are being offered "multiple pathways" in schools and to hold schools accountable for offering students a "complete" education and not one simply measured on test scores. 2)SB 1X (Alpert), Chapter 3, Statutes of 1999 , established the Public Schools Accountability Act, which required the development of the Academic Performance Index (API). The API is used to measure performance of schools and districts over time. An API score is calculated based on students' performance on the following standardized tests: the California Standards Tests (CSTs) in English language arts, mathematics, and history-social science, and science (where applicable), the norm-referenced California Achievement Test (CAT-6) in grades three and seven, and the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE). Analysis Prepared by : Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916) 319-2081