BILL ANALYSIS
AB 722
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 31, 2007
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mark Leno, Chair
AB 722 (Levine) - As Amended: May 30, 2007
Policy Committee: UtilitiesVote:9-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill, commencing July 1, 2010, phases in minimum energy
efficiency requirements for general purpose incandescent light
bulbs over a six-year period.
FISCAL EFFECT
The state may incur higher initial costs to purchase either
compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs or more efficient, and
potentially more expensive, incandescent bulbs. (According to
the Department of General Services (DGS), over a recent two-year
period, the state purchased about $100,000 worth of incandescent
bulbs-about 200,000 bulbs assuming 50 cents per bulb.) These
higher purchase costs would probably be more than offset by
energy savings from the more efficient bulbs.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . According to the author, the purpose of this bill is
to significantly increase the efficiency of indoor and outdoor
lighting systems-thus saving energy costs and emissions of
green-house gases. The bill phases in efficiency standards for
general purpose light bulbs, based on light output, with the
standards first applying in 2010 to general purpose bulbs
equivalent to current 100-watt incandescent bulbs. The
phase-in would gradually include general purpose light bulbs
with lower light output (the equivalent of a 75- watt
incandescent bulb in 2011, a 60-watt bulb in 2012, and a
40-watt bulb in 2016). According to the author, these
standards would increase the efficiency of general purpose
lighting by more than 65% compared to current incandescent
bulbs. Current CFL bulbs are over 70% more efficient than
AB 722
Page 2
incandescent bulbs.
2)Background . Almost 2% of all energy consumption in the state
comes from incandescent bulbs. Approximately 95% of the power
consumed by an incandescent light bulb is emitted as heat,
rather than as visible light, meaning that 95% of the
electricity used when a light bulb is turned on is wasted.
Light output is measured in lumens. A typical 60 watt
incandescent light bulb will create 850 lumens, or close to 14
lumens per watt. A typical CFL bulb creates 950 lumens and
uses only 15 watts of electricity, or 63 lumens per watt--a
fourfold increase in efficiency.
3)Cost Comparison . The cost of an incandescent light bulb is
about $0.50, and CFL bulbs are generally under $3.00 per bulb.
However, the CFL lasts up to 10 times longer than a
traditional incandescent light bulb-10,000 hours versus 1,000
hours. Based on an average California energy cost of $0.105
per kilowatt hour, the total energy cost of a incandescent
light vs. a CFL over the life of a CFL is $78.75 vs. $21.00-an
energy savings of $57.75 with the CFL. Combined with the
difference in purchase price, taking into account expected
life-$3 for a CFL versus $5 for ten incandescent lights-and
the total savings per bulb is $59.75.
Additionally, many power companies have begun providing CFL
bulbs to their customers free or at reduced costs. Currently
all three of the large investor owned utilities and many of
the publicly owned utilities have programs to help reduce the
costs of CFLs.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081