BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 927|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 927
          Author:   Saldana (D)
          Amended:  6/26/07 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM.  :  9-1, 6/19/07
          AYES:  Lowenthal, Cedillo, Corbett, Dutton, Harman, Kehoe,  
            Simitian, Torlakson, Yee
          NOES:  McClintock
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ashburn

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  10-7, 7/16/07
          AYES:  Torlakson, Cedillo, Corbett, Florez, Kuehl, Oropeza,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Simitian, Steinberg, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Aanestad, Ashburn, Battin, Dutton, Runner,  
            Wyland

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  43-29, 5/3/07 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Senior developments within the Multifamily  
          Housing
                      Program

           SOURCE  :     Aging Services of California
                      California American Association of Retired  
          Persons
                      California Commission on Aging
                      Congress of California Seniors 
                      Housing California 

           DIGEST  :    This bill requires that the proportion of  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 927
                                                                Page  
          2

          Multifamily Housing Program funds expended to senior  
          citizen housing units be proportional to the percentage of  
          lower income renter households in the state that are lower  
          income elderly renter households.  

           ANALYSIS  :    Under current law Multifamily Housing Program  
          (MHP) is administered by the Department of Housing and  
          Community Development (HCD), to provide funding for the new  
          construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent  
          and transitional rental housing for low income households.  
          Eligible applicants include local public entities, for  
          profit or nonprofit corporations, limited equity housing  
          cooperatives, individuals, Indian reservations and  
          rancheries, and limited partnerships.  In addition  
          applicants must have developed at least one affordable  
          housing development.  Funds are made available as a  
          deferred payment loans.  In exchange for state funds, the  
          developer must agree to maintain the units as affordable  
          for 55 years.

          In 2002, California voters approved Proposition 46, the  
          $2.1 billion Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act  
          of 2002.  Proposition 46 provided funding for various  
          programs including MHP.  Funds provided under Proposition  
          46 were for the most part exhausted at the end of 2006.  In  
          November 2006, California voters approved Proposition 1C,  
          the Housing and Emergency Trust Fund Act of 2006.   
          Proposition 1C provided $590 million to the Multifamily  
          Housing Program, including set asides of $50 million for  
          housing for homeless youth and $195 million for supportive  
          housing. 

          This bill requires that the percentage of MHP funds that is  
          expended for units restricted by age shall be proportional  
          to the percentage of lower income renter households in the  
          state that are lower income elderly renter households as  
          reported by the federal Department of Housing and Urban  
          Development based on the most recent decennial census  
          conducted by the United States Census Bureau.  The share  
          excludes assistance provided to "housing for homeless  
          youth" and "supportive housing."  However in order to meet  
          the obligations of the bill, the share of senior housing  
          may not fall more than one percent below the proportional  
          share.  Projects still must meet the minimum threshold  







                                                                AB 927
                                                                Page  
          3

          requirements established under the MHP.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions               2007-08     2008-09     
           2009-10   Fund  
          HCD                 up to $35           up to $70up to  
          $70Bond*

          * Proposition 1C funds, Housing Rehabilitation Loan Fund

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/18/07)

          Aging Services of California (co-source) 
          California American Association of Retired Persons  
          (co-source) 
          California Commission on Aging (co-source) 
          Congress of California Seniors (co-source) 
          Housing California (co-source) 
          Advisory Council to Area 1 Agency on Aging
          Alameda County Board of Supervisors
          California Senior Legislature 
          City of San Jose
          Eden Housing
          El Dorado County Commission on Aging
          Golden State Manufactured-Home Owners League, Inc. 
          Jericho
          Lewis Operating Companies
          PEP Housing 
          Retirement Housing Foundation (Long Beach)
          San Diego Housing Federation 
          Triple A Council of California, Inc.
          United Seniors of Alameda County

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  7/18/07)

          Department of Housing and Community Development

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the sponsors of the  







                                                                AB 927
                                                                Page  
          4

          bill, California is facing an affordable senior housing  
          shortage.  There are more seniors who need affordable  
          housing than there are units available.  The sponsors also  
          believe that senior housing projects are not competitive  
          under the current program structure.  By requiring that MHP  
          funding be allocated to senior developments in the same  
          proportion as the number of lower income senior renters  
          represents the total number of lower income renter seniors,  
          the sponsors believe that senior housing would be assured  
          fair access. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    HCD does not believe this bill  
          is necessary.  HCD believes that low-income seniors already  
          receive a fair share of housing funds under the MHP  
          program.  In addition, they believe that establishing a  
          set-aside within MHP will reduce the program's ability to  
          respond to market fluctuations and applicant funding needs.  
           Recently, HCD surveyed its project sponsors asking about  
          senior occupancy in buildings without age restrictions, and  
          the sponsors estimated that 14.6 percent of all assisted  
          units were occupied by households that included seniors.   
          Therefore, HCD believes that seniors are receiving their  
          fair share of housing.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 43-29, 05/03/07
          AYES: Bass, Beall, Berg, Brownley, Caballero, Charles  
            Calderon, Carter, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeSaulnier, Dymally, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Galgiani,  
            Hancock, Hayashi, Hernandez, Huffman, Karnette,  
            Krekorian, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Lieu, Ma,  
            Mendoza, Mullin, Nava, Parra, Portantino, Price,  
            Richardson, Salas, Saldana, Solorio, Swanson, Torrico,  
            Wolk, Nunez
          NOES: Adams, Aghazarian, Anderson, Benoit, Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fuller,  
            Gaines, Garcia, Garrick, Horton, Houston, Jeffries,  
            Keene, La Malfa, Maze, Nakanishi, Niello, Plescia, Silva,  
            Smyth, Strickland, Tran, Villines, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Arambula, Huff, Jones, Sharon Runner,  
            Ruskin, Soto, Spitzer, Vacancy


          JJA:nl  7/18/07   Senate Floor Analyses 







                                                                AB 927
                                                                Page  
          5


                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****