BILL ANALYSIS AB 1879 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1879 (Feuer) As Amended August 20, 2008 Majority vote ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |47-29|(May 29, 2008) |SENATE: |24-13|(August 25, 2008) | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |COMMITTEE VOTE: |7 -0 |(August 30, 2008) |RECOMMENDATION: |Concur | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Original Committee Reference: E.S. & T.M. SUMMARY : Requires the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) to adopt regulations, as specified, to establish processes for identifying, prioritizing, and evaluating chemicals of concern and their potential alternatives. Requires DTSC, in adopting regulations, to prepare a multimedia life cycle evaluation, as defined. Requires DTSC to establish and appoint members to a Green Ribbon Science Panel, which will take specified actions and advise DTSC on science, technical and policy matters. Establishes procedures to exempt the public release of information that is claimed to be a trade secret, as specified. The Senate amendments recast the provisions of the bill as heard by the Assembly, as follows: 1)Require DTSC, by January 1, 2011, to adopt regulations to establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals or chemical ingredients in consumer products that may be considered a "chemical of concern," in accordance with a review process, as specified. a) Require DTSC to adopt regulations using an interagency consultative process that includes public participation; b) Establish a prioritization and identification process that includes a consideration of specified factors (e.g., chemical volume, exposure potential, potential effects on sensitive AB 1879 Page 2 subpopulations); c) Require DTSC to develop criteria for evaluating chemicals and alternatives, as specified (e.g., a consideration of hazard traits, chemical characterization, and health endpoints with reference to the information compiled by the clearinghouse); and, d) Require DTSC to reference and use available information from other nations, governments, and authoritative bodies that have undertaken a similar chemical prioritization process, stipulating that DTSC is not limited to using only such information. 2)Require DTSC, in adopting regulations, to prepare a multimedia life cycle evaluation (evaluation), as defined, conducted by affected agencies and coordinated by DTSC. Require DTSC to submit the regulations and the evaluation to the California Environmental Policy Council (Council), established pursuant to Public Resources Code, subdivision (b) of Section 71017 for review. a) Require the evaluation to consider the following impacts: emissions of air pollutants, contamination of surface and groundwater and soils, disposal or use of byproducts and waste materials, worker safety and impacts to public health, and other anticipated impacts to the environment; b) Require the Council to review the evaluation within 90 days following notice from DTSC of intent to adopt regulations; if the council finds that that the proposed regulations will cause significant adverse impacts to public health or the environment, or that less adverse alternatives exist, the council shall recommend alternative measures to DTSC, as specified; c) Require DTSC to adopt revisions to a proposed regulation within 60 days of receiving notice from the Council for mitigating adverse impacts to achieve a no significant adverse impact level on public health or the environment, as specified; d) Require DTSC to conduct an interagency consultation when coordinating the evaluation; and, AB 1879 Page 3 e) Authorize DTSC to adopt regulations without subjecting these to an evaluation if the Council, following an initial evaluation of proposed regulations, finds that the regulation will not have any significant adverse impact on public health or the environment. 3)Require DTSC, on or before January 1, 2011, to adopt regulations to establish a process to evaluate chemicals of concern, and their potential alternatives, in consumer products in order to determine how best to limit exposure or to reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern, as specified. a) Require the regulations to establish a process that includes an evaluation of the availability of potential alternatives and potential hazards posed by alternatives, as well as an evaluation of critical exposure pathways; b) Require the regulations to include life cycle assessment tools that, at a minimum, take into consideration the following: product function or performance; useful life; materials and resource consumption; water conservation; water quality impacts; air emissions; production, in-use, and transportation energy inputs; energy efficiency; greenhouse gas emissions; waste and end-of-life disposal; public health impacts; environmental impacts; and economic impacts; c) Require the regulations to specify a range of regulatory responses that may result from the outcome of the alternatives analysis, including at least the following: no action; requiring additional information to assess a chemical of concern and its potential alternatives; requiring labeling or other product information; restricting the use of a chemical of concern in a product; prohibiting the use of a chemical of concern in a product; controlling access to or limiting exposure to a of concern in a product; requiring a manufacturer to manage a product at the end of its useful life; requiring the funding of green chemistry where no feasible safer alternative exists; and other requirements determined by DTSC; and, d) Require DTSC to ensure that the tools used in this process allow for an ease of use and transparency of application, as specified. 4)Require DTSC, prior to July 1, 2009, to establish and appoint AB 1879 Page 4 members to a Green Ribbon Science Panel, with expertise that includes fifteen disciplines (chemistry, environmental law, nanotechnology, maternal and child health, etc.), according to public meeting laws and procedures, as specified. a) Authorize the panel to take various actions to advise DTSC and the council on science and technical matters for reducing adverse health and environmental impacts of chemicals used in commerce, encouraging the redesign of products, manufacturing processes; b) Authorize the panel to assist in developing green chemistry and chemicals policy recommendations and implementation strategies; and, c) Authorize the panel to advise DTSC on the adoption of regulations and on priorities for which hazard traits and toxicological end-point data should be collected. 5)Establish procedures to protect and exempt from public release information provided to DTSC that is claimed to be a trade secret, as specified. a) Authorize a person providing information pursuant to this article to identify a portion of the information submitted to DTSC as a trade secret, with procedures and details as specified; b) Prohibit a state agency from releasing to the public information provided pursuant to this article that is a trade secret and that is so identified; c) Authorize public agencies to exchange a properly designated trade secret, as specified, if the trade secret is relevant and necessary to exercise the agencies' jurisdiction; d) Require DTSC, upon a request for the release of information that has been claimed to be a trade secret, to immediately notify the person who submitted the information; e) Require DTSC, within 30-60 days, to determine whether or not the information claimed to be a trade secret is to be released to the public and sets requirements and timelines for action thereof; AB 1879 Page 5 f) Require DTSC, if it decides that the information requested pursuant to this subdivision should be made public, to provide the person who submitted the information 30 days' notice prior to public disclosure of the information, unless, prior to the expiration of the 30-day period, the person who submitted the information obtains an action in an appropriate court for a declaratory judgment that the information is subject to protection under this section or for a preliminary injunction prohibiting disclosure of the information to the public and promptly notifies DTSC of that action; and, g) Provide that hazardous trait submissions for chemicals and chemical ingredients are not subject to the trade secret protections in this bill. 6)Stipulate that no reimbursement is required by this act for costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district. 7)Provide that AB 1879's enactment is contingent upon the enactment of SB 509 (Simitian) of the 2007-08 Regular Session. EXISTING FEDERAL LAW: 1)Declares, under the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA), that adequate authority should exist to regulate chemical substances and mixtures that present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. 2)Declares, under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA), that the public should be protected against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products. Authorizes the Consumer Product Safety Commission to promulgate consumer product safety standards. 3)Requires, under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), that certain hazardous household products bear cautionary labeling to alert consumers to the potential hazards that those products present (such as toxic, corrosive, flammable or combustible) and to inform consumers of the measures they need to take to protect themselves from those hazards. EXISTING STATE LAW : 1)Requires, under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65), the Office of Environmental Health AB 1879 Page 6 Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. 2)Prohibits the knowing and intentional exposure of people to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning. 3)Prohibits the manufacture, sale and distribution in commerce of certain consumer products that contain specific toxics, including PBDEs, lead and phthalates, as defined. 4)Authorizes DTSC to regulate, among other things, packaging containing lead, mercury, cadmium, or hexavalent chromium; jewelry containing lead; lights containing lead or mercury; products containing mercury such as thermometers, barometers and thermostats; and covered electronic devices containing lead, cadmium or mercury. 5)Authorizes the Department of Public Health to regulate, among other things, solder in plumbing fittings or fixtures containing lead; toys containing lead; tableware containing lead or cadmium; PBDEs; and toys and childcare articles containing phthalates. 6)Authorizes the Integrated Waste Management Board to regulate, among other things, products containing mercury such as batteries, switches, relays and ovens and gas ranges with mercury diostats; chemicals and measurement devices in school labs that contain mercury; and novelty items containing mercury. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill authorized DTSC to regulate consumer products containing specified chemicals (phthalates, mercury, lead, cadmium, arsenic, polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs), and hexavalent chromium) and established requirements thereof. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown. COMMENTS : Purpose of Bill : According to the author, AB 1879 represents a balanced, science-based approach to addressing the danger of hazardous chemicals contained in consumer products. California consumers deserve a robust and thoughtful approach to addressing AB 1879 Page 7 this issue. The existing regulatory authority of the department is limited by statute and only applies to certain classes of consumer products. For example, lead can be regulated in jewelry and water faucets, but few other products. Hazardous heavy metals, such as cadmium or mercury, can be regulated in certain electronic or other devices, but in few other products. The author contends that AB 1879 provides for a more expansive approach without prejudging what chemicals and what products, or what actions should be taken. The bill provides an open and transparent process for identifying and prioritizing the most dangerous chemicals and for determining what the department should do about these chemicals contained in products. AB 1879 is a multi-faceted approach to provide state regulators with the authority they need to protect public health and limit Californians' exposure to hazardous chemicals. What is Green Chemistry ? Green Chemistry, as defined in Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, is, "?the utilization of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products." For the last century, environmental protection has concentrated on capturing and storing hazardous waste. Green Chemistry is a fundamentally new approach to environmental protection, transitioning away from managing toxic chemicals at the end of the lifecycle, to reducing or eliminating their use altogether. Green chemistry encourages cleaner and less-polluting industrial processes, while creating new economic opportunities in the design and use of chemicals, materials, products and processes. Need for Comprehensive Chemical Policy : According to DTSC, despite landmark environmental and occupational legislation in the 1970s, including passage of the federal Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in 1976, many experts have concluded that chemicals policy in the U.S. has not been sufficiently protective of human health or the environment, nor has it promoted innovation in the chemicals market. There continue to be substantive gaps in understanding about the health and environmental effects of the great majority of the 83,000 chemical substances listed in the TSCA Inventory. The U.S. EPA's voluntary High Production Volume Challenge has made limited progress in improving information on chemicals, which are produced or imported at more than one million pounds per year. Global chemical production, meanwhile, continues to grow at about 3% per year, doubling every 25 years. Many of these substances come in contact with people - in the workplace, in homes, through AB 1879 Page 8 the use of products, and through air, water, food and waste streams - and many of them enter the earth's finite ecosystems at some point during their lifecycle. The California Green Chemistry Initiative : Last year, the Governor called for the creation of a Green Chemistry Initiative stating that "a comprehensive and unified approach is needed to ensure good, accountable policy" and "I encourage the legislature and all interested parties to participate in the development of this important initiative." Linda Adams, Secretary of Cal/EPA, directed DTSC to develop the Initiative. Goals of the Green Chemistry Initiative include developing a consistent means for evaluating risk, reducing exposure, encouraging less-toxic industrial processes, and identifying safer, non-chemical alternatives. Earlier this year, the Green Chemistry Initiative Science Advisory Panel, which consists of scientists and other experts in the field, presented options for the State to consider in order to advance Green Chemistry concepts. While AB 1879 addresses many of the Panel's recommendations, it particularly focuses on the following options, "Advance the science of alternatives assessment; Adopt a policy to identify chemicals of concern, including, as appropriate, associated processes and approaches, and develop specific criteria for this purpose; Target chemical uses of concern based on hazard, exposure and risk; Require product manufacturers and importers in California to disclose chemical ingredients; Require chemical makers and users to systematically identify and consider safer alternatives; and Authorize Cal/EPA to phase out hazardous chemicals." AB 1879, together with SB 509 (Simitian), carries the Administration's Green Chemistry proposal for this legislative session. The two bills incorporate the following provisions of the proposal: AB 1879 Identification and Prioritization of Chemicals of Concern (Section 25252) Alternatives Evaluation and Enforcement Authority (Section 25253) Multimedia Lifecycle Assessment (Section 25252.5) Green Ribbon Science Panel (Section 25254) Trade Secrecy (Section 25257) AB 1879 Page 9 SB 509 Definitions and Exemptions (Section 25251) Toxics Information Clearinghouse (Sections 25256, 25256.1, 25256.2, and 25256.3) Follow-up legislation : While it is the intent of the authors to establish an effective, comprehensive chemical policy program and to authorize DTSC to effectively regulate chemicals in consumer products in order to protect public health and the environment, should these bills be signed into law, the Legislature may wish to consider follow-up legislation that includes: more clearly and explicitly defining DTSC's authority to regulate chemicals in consumer products and authority to enforce those regulations, conflict-of-interest provisions for the Green Ribbon Science Advisory Panel process, legislative appointments to the Panel, trade secret provisions that ensure protection of public health and the environment, and ensuring expedient and efficient action on chemicals and products that may pose imminent public health or environmental hazards. Analysis Prepared by : Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 319-3965 FN: 0007741