BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2522
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 16, 2008

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                             Anna Marie Caballero, Chair
                AB 2522 (Arambula) - As Introduced:  February 21, 2008
           
          SUBJECT  :  San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District:   
          vehicle license fees.

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution  
          Control District (District) to increase vehicle license fees to  
          a maximum of $30.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Makes findings and declarations relative to the air quality of  
            San Joaquin Valley and the need for expanded emission  
            reduction programs in order to achieve and maintain state and  
            federal ambient air quality standards.  

          2)Authorizes the District to increase the current $6 vehicle  
            license fee limit up to, but not exceeding, $30 per vehicle  
            per year for incentive-based programs to achieve surplus  
            emissions reductions.  

          3)Requires the adoption of a resolution providing for both the  
            fee increase and a corresponding program for expenditure of  
            the moneys raised by the increased fees for the reduction of  
            mobile source emissions.  

          4)Authorizes the District to adopt rules and regulations to  
            reduce vehicle trips in order to reduce air pollution from  
            vehicular sources.  

          5)Authorizes the imposition of the fees until 2024.  

          6)Provides that the fees may be imposed after the 2012-13 fiscal  
            year only if the United States Environmental Protection Agency  
            approves the District's proposed reclassification of its  
            non-attainment status for ozone from severe to extreme.  

          7)Requires that at least $10 million of the fees collected be  
            used to mitigate the impacts of air pollution on public health  
            and the environment in disproportionately impacted  
            environmental justice communities, as defined in the San  
            Joaquin Valley.  









                                                                  AB 2522
                                                                  Page  2

          8)Requires the District to convene an environmental justice (EJ)  
            advisory committee, with participants selected from a list  
            given to the board by EJ groups from the San Joaquin Valley,  
            to recommend the neighborhoods that constitute EJ communities.

          9)Requires the EJ advisory committee to recommend how the funds  
            should be expended within those communities.  

          10)Requires the California Air Resources Board (ARB), prior to  
            the fees being effective, to make two separate findings that  
            the District:  

             a)   Has undertaken all feasible measures to reduce  
               non-attainment air pollutants from sources within its  
               jurisdiction and regulatory control; and  

             b)   Has notified ARB that fees have been adopted and has  
               provided ARB with an estimate 
             of the total funds that will be provided annually by the  
               fees.  

          11)Requires ARB to file a written copy of its findings with the  
            Secretary of State within two days of its determination.  

          12)Requires the Bureau of State Audits to audit the fee  
            assessment and the expenditures every two years that the fees  
            are assessed, and to submit these audits to the Legislature  
            within two weeks of their completion.  

          13)Requires ARB to assess the District's progress in using any  
            fees to achieve and maintain state and federal ambient air  
            quality standards every two years that the fees are assessed,  
            and to submit these assessments to the Legislature within two  
            weeks of their completion.  

          14)Requires the District to submit an assessment to the  
            Legislature by January 1, 2010, on the manner in which vehicle  
            license fees or other types of fees could be imposed on  
            vehicles that are not registered within its jurisdictional  
            area, but that travel through it.  

          15)Provides that no local agency reimbursement is required from  
            the State Mandates Claim Fund because the local agency has  
            requested the authority from this legislation.  









                                                                  AB 2522
                                                                  Page  3

          16)Provides that the provisions of this bill become effective  
            only if SB 240 (Florez), pending in the Assembly  
            Appropriations Committee, is enacted.  
           
          EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Establishes the District, consisting of the Counties of  
            Fresno, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and  
            Tulare, and that portion of the County of Kern that is within  
            the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, and requires the District to  
            adopt and enforce rules and regulations to achieve and  
            maintain ambient air quality standards, as provided.  

          2)Requires the United States Environmental Protection Agency,  
            under the federal Clean Air Act, to establish national ambient  
            air quality standards for criteria air pollutants at levels  
            that are required to protect the public health with an  
            adequate margin of safety.  

          3)Provides, under the federal Clean Air Act, that state and  
            local governments have primary responsibility for the control  
            of air pollution.  

          4)Requires ARB to achieve the maximum degree of emission  
            reduction possible from vehicular and other mobile sources in  
            order to accomplish the attainment of state ambient air  
            quality standards by the earliest practicable date.  

          5)Authorizes an air pollution control district designated by ARB  
            as a state non-attainment area for any pollutant emitted by  
            motor vehicles to levy a fee of up to $6 on motor vehicles  
            registered within an air district.  

          6)Requires an air district imposing such a fee to enact a  
            resolution providing for both the fee increase and for a  
            corresponding program for expenditure of the increased fees.  

          7)Requires the program to provide for the reduction of air  
            pollution from motor vehicles, and for related planning,  
            monitoring, enforcement, and technical studies.  

          8)States that after January 1, 2015, the fee levied on vehicles  
            within an air district is reduced from $6 to $4.  

          9)Requires the District to adopt a schedule of fees on area wide  








                                                                  AB 2522
                                                                  Page  4

            or indirect emission sources that are regulated, but for which  
            permits are not issued, to recover its costs associated with  
            these sources.  

          10)Authorizes the District to impose an additional $1 surcharge,  
            to be paid to the Department 
          of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and deposited into the Motor Vehicle  
            Account for allocation to the District for certain purposes,  
            such as clean fuels programs and motor vehicle use reduction  
            measures.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS :  

          1)According to the author, "the San Joaquin Valley suffers some  
            of the worst air quality in the world, which poses a  
            significant threat to public health, the environment, and the  
            economy 
          of the valley.  The Valley has the third highest fine  
            particulate matter levels in the U.S. and is home to four of  
            the five worst ozone-polluted cities in the U.S.  One in three  
            Valley families has a member with a respiratory ailment, and  
            the poor air quality contributes to 460 deaths per year."  
           
           2)There are currently 2.6 million cars, trucks and motorcycles  
            registered in the eight county area that comprises the San  
            Joaquin Air District.  Each owner of a motor vehicle  
            registered in the Counties of Fresno, Kings, Madera, Merced,  
            San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare, and the valley portion of  
            Kern County pays an annual $6 fee, the revenue from which is  
            earmarked for air quality programs related to vehicle use.  In  
            addition, the District is required to impose a $1 fee on  
            annual motor vehicle registration to reduce emissions through  
            activities such as clean fuels programs and adoption of motor  
            vehicle use reduction measures.  These two fees combine to  
            generate $18 million annually, with a small percentage  
            retained by DMV to pay for its imposition and collection  
            costs.

          3)According to the author's office, AB 2522 authorizes the  
            District to increase the surcharge on vehicle licensing fees  
            to $30 annually, per motor vehicle.  The funds generated will  
            be used for incentive based air quality improvement programs  
            to bring the San Joaquin Valley into compliance with state and  








                                                                  AB 2522
                                                                  Page  5

            federal air quality standards by the earliest practicable  
            date.  If the District fully exercises the authority provided  
            by this bill, annual revenue generated by the $30 air  
            pollution fee would initially amount to an estimated $96  
            million, an increase of $78 million over current revenue  
            generated by the combined $7 in fees.  Because population  
            growth in the San Joaquin Valley is currently among the  
            highest in California and is projected to continue to outpace  
            the rest of the state, this revenue would increase  
            substantially over the years.  


          4)Supporters indicate that "poor air quality is a significant  
            threat to public health, the environment, and the economy of  
            the region.  The San Joaquin Valley does not meet state and  
            federal ambient air quality standards.  Therefore, creating a  
            program that combines more strict clean air rules and  
            regulations and ongoing funding to clean up sources of air  
            pollution is critical."  

          5)According to the District, "approximately 85% of the necessary  
            emissions reductions will come from regulations, but a  
            substantial increase in incentive funding will be necessary in  
            order to achieve the remainder of the reductions necessary to  
            attain federal air quality standards for ozone and particulate  
            matter.  The incentive funding is targeted at mobile sources  
            of pollution that account for 80% of the nitrogen oxide  
            emissions in the San Joaquin Valley."

          6)In opposition to the measure, the Stop Hidden Taxes Coalition  
            indicates that "in the past five years, the California  
            Legislature and local governments have tried to impose more  
            than $7 billion in new taxes while avoiding constitutional  
            approval requirements for tax increases. The strategy is to  
            disguise taxes as mere regulatory "fees" in order to avoid the  
            public debate and rigorous vote requirement that voters have  
            repeatedly demanded before taxes are raised."   

          7)This bill will only take effect if SB 240 (Florez) is also  
            enacted and becomes effective.  
          SB 240 is similar to this bill; however, SB 240 did not pass out  
            of the Assembly Appropriations Committee.  
           
           8)This bill is double-referred to the Committees on  
            Transportation, where it passed with an 8-2 vote on April 7,  








                                                                  AB 2522
                                                                  Page  6

            2008, and to Local Government. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          American Lung Association of CA
          CA League of Conservation Voters
          Coalition for Clean Air
          Planning and Conservation League
          San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
          Supervisor Michael J. Rubio, Supervisor, Fifth District, Kern  
          County

           Opposition 
           
          CA New Car Dealers Association 
          STOP Hidden Taxes Coalition
           
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958