BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2537|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2537
          Author:   Furutani (D)
          Amended:  8/29/08 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LABOR & INDUS. RELATIONS COMMITTEE  :  3-2, 6/25/08
          AYES:  Migden, Kuehl, Padilla
          NOES:  Wyland, Ackerman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Not available

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  75-0, 5/19/08 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Public works:  exemption:  volunteers

           SOURCE  :     California Association of Local Conservation  
          Corps
                      Sacramento Local Conservation Corps


           DIGEST  :    This bill allows volunteers to continue  
          contributing their labor to public works projects, and  
          provides for an evaluation of the impact of such  
          participation.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing Law  

          1. Defines public works as any construction, alteration,  
             demolition, installation or repair work done under  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2537
                                                                Page  
          2

             contract and paid for in whole or in part from public  
             funds.  This includes work performed during the design  
             and pre-construction phase, including, but not limited  
             to, inspection and land surveying.

          2. Requires, with certain exceptions, contracted public  
             works projects to be submitted for bids by the public  
             entity requesting the work, and that the contract is  
             awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.  The awarding  
             body is required to ensure that the winning contractor  
             is appropriately licensed with the Contractors' State  
             Licensing Board, and has not been in barred from bidding  
             on, accepting, or performing public contracts.

          3. Requires all employees who work on public works projects  
             with a budget of $1,000 or more to be paid the general  
             prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general  
             prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work for the  
             specific location where the public work is to be  
             performed.  This prevailing wage is determined by the  
             Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). 

          4. Exempts from public work requirements any project where  
             the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) contracts with  
             public agencies, Indian tribes, or nonprofit  
             organizations for fish and wildlife habitat  
             preservation, restoration, and enhancement.  Existing  
             law also allows the DFG to contract with public and  
             private entities for fish and wildlife habitat  
             preservation, restoration, and enhancement, but these  
             contracts are only exempt from public work requirements  
             if they are less than $50,000.

          5. Exempts any work performed by volunteers from the public  
             works requirements, but the exemption allowing  
             volunteers on public works projects is set to expire on  
             January 1, 2009.

          6. Volunteers are defined as:

             A.    Individuals who perform works for civic,  
                charitable, or humanitarian reasons for a public  
                agency or tax-exempt organization, such as a  
                501(c)(3), without any compensation.







                                                               AB 2537
                                                                Page  
          3


             B.    Volunteer coordinators.

             Members of the California Conservation Corps (CCC) or  
             the Community Conservation Corps are also exempt.

          7. Excludes from the definition of a volunteer:

             A.    Anyone who works on the public works project for  
                compensation.

             B.    Anyone who received payment from the contractor  
                on the public works project for construction,  
                alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or  
                maintenance work on the same project.  

          This bill:

          1. Extends the sunset on the exemption for volunteers on  
             public works project out three years, from January 1,  
             2009 to January 1, 2012.

          2. Requires the Director of the DIR to submit a written  
             report to the Legislature by January 1, 2011 that does  
             the following:

              A.    Describes the number and nature of complaints  
                received and investigations conducted involving the  
                use of volunteers on public works projects.

              B.    Provides an estimate, for specified projects, of  
                the number of hours per year that volunteers work on  
                public works projects, the cost per year of public  
                works projects and the percentage of work performed  
                by volunteers, and the types of work done by  
                volunteers on public works projects.

          3. Appropriates $100,000 from the Environmental License  
             Plate Fund for purposes of completing the report.

          4. States that the Legislature finds and declares that:

              A.    It is the intent of the Legislature that public  
                works projects should never undermine the wage base  







                                                               AB 2537
                                                                Page  
          4

                in a community.

              B.    The requirement that workers on public works  
                projects be paid the prevailing rate of per diem  
                wages ensures that the local wage base is not  
                lowered.

              C.    This Act shall not apply to the work of state and  
                local public sector employees.

           Background
           
          This bill revisits an issue that arose in 2004 concerning  
          the use of volunteer labor on certain public works  
          projects.  Much of the attention that arose at that time  
          was a result of an enforcement action taken by DIR in July  
          2003 in relation to a stream restoration project in Shasta  
          County.  

          In fiscal year 2000-01, the Department of Water Resources  
          (DWR) provided grant funding to the Sacramento Watersheds  
          Action Group for a stream restoration project on Sulphur  
          Creek in the City of Redding.  According to media reports,  
          students from nearby Shasta College were used for various  
          activities including planting seeds, clearing brush,  
          repairing culverts, installing rock beds to prevent  
          erosion, and trash removal.  The students reportedly earned  
          course credit for classes in watershed restoration.

          Responding to a complaint from a local labor organization,  
          DIR investigated and determined that, based on the  
          submitted job descriptions of the work performed by  
          students and volunteers, prevailing wages were required for  
          the following work:  willow staking, spreading seeds and  
          mulch, planting shrubs, operating heavy equipment, site  
          cleanup, off-hauling garbage, and planting vegetation.  The  
          subsequent DIR enforcement action assessed back wages and  
          civil penalties.

          In September 2003, DWR issued a memorandum that stated,  
          "Due to the serious implications to our programs that would  
          arise from being unable to support volunteerism, DWR is  
          taking a conservative approach until these issues can be  
          clarified.  We will not enter into any new contracts  







                                                               AB 2537
                                                                Page  
          5

          possibly affected by these issues until we have a clearer  
          picture of the obligations of DWR and the grantees under  
          the Labor Code."  Following the July 2003 enforcement  
          action, there was an outcry among many in the environmental  
          community that the prior Labor Code Section 1720.4, as  
          interpreted by DIR, effectively prohibited the mixed use of  
          volunteer and paid labor on public works projects.   

          After lengthy negotiations between the environmental  
          community and representatives of organized labor, the  
          Legislature enacted AB 2690 (Hancock), Chapter 330,  
          Statutes of 2004.  AB 2690 amended Labor Code Section  
          1720.4 into its current form.  In order to address concerns  
          that there may be abuses of any "volunteer" exemption to  
          California's prevailing wage laws, AB2690 contained a  
          January 1, 2009 sunset date.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2008-09     2009-10     
           2010-11   Fund  
          Sunset extension of                     no new costs  
          through 1/1/2011                             Various
            limited exemption from
            public works definition

          DIR study                $100                     Special*

          *Environmental License Plate Fund

          SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/29/08)

          California Association of Local Conservation Corps  
          (co-source)
          Sacramento Local Conservation Corps (co-source)
          Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County
          California Council of Land Trusts
          California Invasive Plant Council
          California Native Plant Society







                                                               AB 2537
                                                                Page  
          6

          California Outdoor Heritage Alliance
          California Park and Recreation Society
          California Regional Council of Rural Counties
          California ReLeaf
          California Special Districts Association
          City of El Cerrito
          City of Long Beach
          City of Redding
          Coalition to Protect Watershed Volunteers and California's  
          Prevailing Wages
          Community Services Employment Training
          Friends of Harbors, Beaches, and Parks
          Glenn County Resource Conservation District
          Marin Conservation Corps 
          Maritime Museum of San Diego
          Newport Beach Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation
          Ocean Institute
          Planning and Conservation League
          Regional Council of Rural Counties
          Regional Open Space
          Sacramento Valley Rugby Foundation
          Salmonid Restoration Federation
          San Diego Association of Nonprofits
          San Francisco Conservation Corps
          San Francisco Maritime National park Association
          Save The Bay
          Sierra Nevada Alliance
          Solano County Water Agency
          The Nature Conservancy
          The Trust for Public Land
          Urban Corps of San Diego County

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT :    The author's office argues that  
          volunteer use maximizes available and limited grant funds  
          that are designated for important community purposes.  In  
          2006, California volunteers contributed approximately 860  
          million hours of community service.  Volunteers continue to  
          support California every day as they build Little League  
          fields, create school gardens, plant trees, beautify  
          neighborhoods, and engage in numerous other important  
          activities.  There have been no complaints of exemption  
          abuse to the State Labor Commissioner or to the Department  
          of Industrial Relations, say supporters, and California  
          volunteers should remain exempted from the prevailing wage  







                                                               AB 2537
                                                                Page  
          7

          requirement.  This bill extends the sunset on the exemption  
          and allow for an evaluation of any problems.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 
          AYES:  Adams, Aghazarian, Anderson, Arambula, Beall,  
            Benoit, Berg, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Brownley, Caballero,  
            Charles Calderon, Carter, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre,  
            De Leon, DeSaulnier, DeVore, Duvall, Dymally, Emmerson,  
            Evans, Feuer, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines,  
            Galgiani, Garcia, Hancock, Hayashi, Hernandez, Horton,  
            Houston, Huff, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Karnette, Keene,  
            Krekorian, La Malfa, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Lieu,  
            Maze, Mendoza, Mullin, Nakanishi, Niello, Nunez, Parra,  
            Plescia, Portantino, Price, Sharon Runner, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Smyth, Solorio, Spitzer, Strickland,  
            Swanson, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Walters, Wolk, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Eng, Garrick, Ma, Nava, Soto


          NC:do  8/28/08   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****