BILL NUMBER:  SB 77
  VETOED	DATE: 08/24/2007




Arnold SchwarzeneggerAugust 24, 2007
Governor

State of California
Governor's Office

I object to the following appropriations contained in Senate Bill 77.


Item 0250-001-0001 For support of Judicial Branch.  I revise this
item by deleting Provision 5.

I am deleting Provision 5, which would state the Legislature s intent
that the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) prioritize
existing resources to provide a $5 increase to the hourly rates paid
to attorneys in the Court Appointed Counsel Program (Program).  A
study of the Program s attorney rates is currently underway and is
due to be completed by the end of August 2007.  To the extent that
the study justifies rate increases, the AOC has the ability to
provide increases commensurate with the needs as determined by the
study.

Item 0250-101-0932 For local assistance, Judicial Branch.  I reduce
this item from $3,056,153,000 to $3,035,796,000 by reducing:

(1)45.10-Support for Operation of the Trial Courts from
$2,632,142,000 to $2,611,785,000;

and by revising Provision 4.

I am reducing this item by $20,357,000, which includes a reduction of
$17,377,000 for funding to support the implementation of the Omnibus
Conservatorship and Guardianship Reform Act of 2006 (Act) and a
reduction of $2,980,000 for one month of savings related to the 50
new trial court judgeships established in 2006-07.  It is my
intention for the Judicial Branch to delay implementation of the Act
until the 200809 fiscal year.  Due to the timing of appointments and
hiring, one month of the funding for new judgeships will not be
necessary in 200708.  These reductions are necessary in order to
further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties
in revenues and spending that we face this year.

I am revising Provision 4, which would require the Judicial Council
to allocate not less than $5,250,000 for court interpreter pay
increases and other recruiting and retention incentives.  Requiring
the Judicial Council to allocate funds for court interpreter
recruiting and retention incentives would alter the collective
bargaining process by shifting the focus from the actual need for pay
increases and other recruiting and retention measures, as negotiated
through the normal process, to the minimum level of funding
allocated.

Provision 4 is revised as follows:

 The funds appropriated in Schedule (4) shall be for payments for
services of contractual court interpreters, and certified and
registered court interpreters employed by the courts, and the
following court interpreter coordinators: 1.0 each in counties of the
1st through the 15th classes, 0.5 each in counties of the 16th
through the 31st classes, and 0.25 each in counties of the 32nd
through the 58th classes. For the purposes of this provision,  court
interpreter coordinators  may be full- or part-time court employees,
or those contracted by the court to perform these services.

The Judicial Council shall set statewide or regional rates and
policies for payment of court interpreters, not to exceed the rate
paid to certified interpreters in the federal court system.
The Legislature finds and declares that there exists a shortage in
the availability of certified and registered interpreters in the
state courts that reduces the state s ability to provide meaningful
access to justice for all court users, including parties, witnesses,
and victims.  Therefore, every effort must be made to recruit and
retain qualified interpreters to work in the state courts.

Of the amount appropriated in Schedule (4), not less than five
million dollars ($5,000,000), not including funds provided pursuant
to Section 77202 of the Government Code, shall be provided to the
trial courts for the purpose of adjusting or creating pay ranges for
court interpreter employees that, at the top of the range, do not
exceed the top step of the full performance range for staff
interpreters in the Federal Courts as of the effective date of this
provision.  The establishment of pay ranges and their application to
specific employee classifications shall be subject to meet and confer
in good faith as provided in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with
Section 71800) of Title 8 of the Government Code.  The Judicial
Council shall adjust statewide or regional rates for contract court
interpreters in a manner that is equivalent to the average rate of
increase provided to court interpreter employees.   The Judicial
Council shall notify the courts in each region of the availability of
these funds for the purposes set forth in this provision, and shall
allocate the funds upon notification that ranges and salary
adjustments have been established and implemented as provided herein.
  In no event shall the daily rate set by the Judicial Council for
contract interpreters exceed the equivalent median wage of court
interpreters employed by the courts in each region.

Of the amount appropriated in Schedule (4), the Judicial Council
shall allocate not less than two hundred fifty thousand dollars
($250,000) to develop and make available to trial courts, interpreter
training and recruitment programs including, but not limited to: 1)
training programs designed for working interpreters who are subject
to new certification exams in Russian, Western Armenian, Mandarin,
Cambodian and Punjabi; 2) certification exam preparation courses for
all languages subject to state certification exams; and 3)
development of mentoring and internship programs in the trial courts
for exam candidates attending educational institutions that train
legal interpreters, subject to meet and confer in good faith as
provided in Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 71800) of Title 8 of
the Government Code. The Judicial Council shall adopt appropriate
rules and procedures for the administration of these funds. The
Judicial Council shall report to the Legislature and Director of
Finance annually regarding expenditures from this schedule, which
shall also include a report of expenditures for; equivalent work days
of, non-certified and non-registered contract interpreters that
provide interpretation services in the state trial courts; and number
of interpreter vacancies filled.

Item 0250-111-0001 For local assistance, Judicial Branch.  I reduce
this item from $1,813,729,000 to $1,793,372,000.

I am reducing this item by $20,357,000 to conform with the action
taken in Item 02501010932.

Item 0530-001-9732 For support of Secretary of Health and Human
Services Agency.  I reduce this item from $182,976,000 to
$177,841,000 by reducing:

(1)30-Office of Systems Integration from $182,976,000 to
$177,841,000.

This reduction conforms to the action taken in Item 5180-151-0001.

Item 0540-492 Reappropriation, Secretary for Resources.  I revise
this item by deleting Schedule 1.

 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the period to liquidate
encumbrances of the following citations is extended to June 30, 2008:
0001-General Fund
(1) Item 0540-101-0001, Budget Act of 1999 (Ch. 50, Stats. 1999), as
reappropriated by Item 0540-492, Budget Act of 2002 (Ch. 379,
Stats. 2002), Item 0540-490, Budget Acts of 2003 (Ch. 157,
Stats. 2003), 2005 (Chs. 38 and 39, Stats. 2005), and 2006 (Chs.
47 and 48, Stats. 2006), and Item 0540491, Budget Act of 2004
(Ch. 208, Stats. 2004)
(2) Item 0540-101-0001, Budget Act of 2000 (Ch. 52, Stats. 2000), as
reappropriated by Item 0540-490, Budget Acts of 2003 (Ch. 157,
Stats. 2003), 2005 (Chs. 38 and 39, Stats. 2005), and 2006 (Chs. 47
and 48, Stats. 2006) and Item 0540-491, Budget Act of 2004 (Ch. 208,
Stats. 2004)
(3) Item 0540-101-0001, Budget Act of 2001 (Ch. 106, Stats. 2001), as
reappropriated by Item 0540-491, Budget Act of 2004 (Ch. 208,
Stats. 2004), and Item 0540-490, Budget Acts of 2005 (Chs. 38 and 39,
Stats. 2005) and 2006 (Chs. 47 and 48, Stats. 2006)

I am eliminating the expenditure availability for two projects funded
from the Coastal Resources Grant program.  Funds for these projects
have been available since 1999 and no funds have been expended on
either project as required by the grant agreements.  Several
obstacles remain, making progress on these projects unlikely in the
near future.  Consequently, it would not be prudent to continue
earmarking General Fund for these projects.  This action will result
in $577,500 of General Fund savings.

Item 0552-001-0001 For support of the Office of the Inspector
General.  I reduce this item from $19,265,000 to $18,306,000 by
reducing:

(1)10-Office of Inspector General from $19,265,000 to $18,306,000,

and by deleting Provision 1.

I am deleting the $959,000 augmentation for the Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) to implement their review of all candidates
for superintendent in Division of Juvenile Justice facilities.
Superintendent review was mandated by Chapter 709, Statutes of 2006
(AB 971).  While I believe these activities are important, I am
directing the OIG to delay implementation of this measure in order to
further build a prudent reserve in light of the various
uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.

Provision 1 would require the OIG to complete a study of custody
resources within the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation s (CDCR) budget related to the transfer of various
medical guarding and transportation positions within the CDCR.  I am
concerned about the large number of programs being created and
expanded within the OIG.  The Budget includes additional resources
for audits and investigations, auditing the budget of the California
Prison Receivership, monitoring compliance with court orders in the
Armstrong case, and chairing the California Rehabilitation Oversight
Board created by Chapter 7, Statutes of 2007 (AB 900).  Because of
the increased workload requirements within their programmatic
expansions and responsibilities, the OIG will not be able to complete
this study.  However, I am directing the CDCR s reactivated Program
Support Unit, whose historical responsibilities have included
studying and making recommendations on custody staffing levels within
the CDCR, to conduct this study.

Item 0690-002-0001 For Support of Office of Emergency Services.  I
delete Provision 4.

I am deleting Provision 4, which specifies that the duties and
responsibilities of the State AntiGang Coordinator will be subject to
additional definition in legislation.  However, I will continue to
work with the Legislature to further define the role of the
Coordinator to assist state and local agencies in combating gang
violence.

Item 0690-102-0214 For local assistance, Office of Emergency
Services.  I delete Provision 1.

I am deleting Provision 1, which specifies that funds for grants to
cities and communitybased organizations are for gang prevention,
intervention, reentry, education, job training and skills
development, and family and community services.  In addition, the
language in Provision 1 specifies that none of the funds can be used
for law enforcement suppression activities or frontline police
services.

While prevention and intervention are necessary components of a
comprehensive antigang strategy, so is suppression.  Therefore, I am
vetoing Provision 1 and directing the State AntiGang Coordinator to
draft and provide cities with grant instructions specifying that
suppression activities are an allowable use of the funds, along with
the other activities listed in Provision 1.

Item 0820-001-0001 For support of Department of Justice.  I revise
this item from $404,237,000 to $403,237,000, by reducing:

(8)45-Public Rights from $92,478,000 to $89,312,000;

(15)Amount payable from Hazardous Waste Control Account (Item
0820-001-0014) from $1,973,000 to -$987,000;

(26)Amount payable from the Toxic Substances Control Account
(Item 08200010557) $2,361,000 to -$1,181,000;

and by deleting Provision 12.

I am deleting the $1,000,000 legislative augmentation that would have
provided funding for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to
independently pursue climate change litigation as the plaintiff on
behalf of the state.  In the area of law related to climate change,
the Air Resources Board (ARB) is the state agency with the
responsibility to oversee litigation in that arena and has the funds
to request the DOJ to pursue such litigation.

I am deleting Provision 12 to conform to this action.

I am reducing the Environmental Law Section's appropriations from the
Hazardous Waste Control Account and the Toxic Substances Control
Account by a total of $2,166,000 to reflect half-year funding for the
program, and I urge the Legislature to pass legislation that
redirects these funds to the California Environmental Protection
Agency's (Cal/EPA) and the Department of Toxic Substances Control's
(DTSC) green chemistry initiative and returns the litigation
oversight role in hazardous waste cases to Cal/EPA and DTSC.  DTSC is
increasingly turning to our local government partners and district
attorneys to enforce California s hazardous waste laws.  In addition,
Cal/EPA and DTSC are developing a green chemistry initiative that
will change the paradigm of toxic and chemical use and enforcement in
California.  The combination of these activities will improve our
environment and human health through greater enforcement of current
hazardous waste laws and usher in a new future to the approach of
chemical use in California.  In addition, when developing the 2008-09
Budget, we will review the litigation needs in this area and budget
the necessary funds for legal services within DTSC's budget.

I am sustaining the $541,000 legislative augmentation for the first
year of a multi-year project to update the DOJ Automated Firearms
Systems database.  However, I am concerned that there has been no
review done to ensure the information technology solution addresses
the program needs.  In addition, I am concerned that competing
demands for the Dealers' Record of Sale Special Account funds could
necessitate an increase in fees on the sale of firearms.  Therefore,
in addition to having an approved feasibility study report prior to
expending any funds, I am also requesting the DOJ to provide the
Department of Finance and the Legislature with a long-term analysis
of the fund, including any known pressures on that fund, to ensure
that there are sufficient resources to cover the program costs
without necessitating a fee increase.

Item 0820-001-0014 For support of Department of Justice.  I reduce
this item from $1,973,000 to $987,000.

I am revising this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item
0820-001-0001.

Item 0820-001-0557 For support of Department of Justice.  I reduce
this item from $2,361,000 to $1,181,000.

I am revising this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item
0820-001-0001.

Item 0855-101-0367 For local assistance, California Gambling Control
Commission.  I reduce this item from $30,283,000 to $283,000 and
delete Provision 1.

I am deleting the $30,000,000 for grants to local government agencies
to mitigate the impacts on the local governments by tribal casinos.
As evidenced in a recent Bureau of State Audits report, there is
great concern regarding whether these funds are being used solely for
their intended purpose, which is to mitigate the impacts of having
tribal casinos in their communities.  I will support legislation that
includes an appropriation for mitigation funds if the process is
reformed.

I am deleting Provision 1 to conform to this action.

With this reduction, there still remains $283,000 for payment to Del
Norte County which reflects local mitigation grant funding not
received by Del Norte County from the Indian Gaming Special
Distribution Fund in fiscal years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06.

Item 0860-001-0001 For support of State Board of Equalization. I
reduce this item from $218,835,000 to $218,435,000 by reducing:

(2)300000-Operating Expense and Equipment from $96,269,000 to
$95,869,000,

and by deleting Provision 3.

I am deleting this legislative augmentation of $400,000 for a county
assessor pilot program designed to promote taxpayer awareness of the
requirement to pay use tax on non-exempt purchases if sales tax has
not been paid.  This reduction is necessary to limit program
expansions and provide for a prudent General Fund reserve in light of
the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this
year.

Item 0890-001-0001 For support of Secretary of State.  I reduce this
item from $48,157,500 to $47,822,000 by reducing:

(2)20-Elections from $46,933,500 to $46,598,000.

I am deleting the $335,500 legislative augmentation for 4.0 positions
which would provide staffing to expand voter outreach and education
efforts to support the three elections scheduled for 2008.  During a
time of limited General Fund resources, the counties, political
parties, and civic organizations must step up and encourage and
promote increased voter participation.

Item 3110-101-0001 For local assistance, Special Resources Program.
I delete this item and Provision 1.

I am deleting the $200,000 legislative augmentation for the Tahoe
Regional Planning Agency for regulation enforcement and transit
system development.  It is premature to provide additional funding
until the bi-state commission completes its report.  With these
reductions, $3,800,000 still remains to provide California's share of
funding for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

I am deleting Provision 1 to conform to this action.

Item 3340-101-6051 For local assistance, California Conservation
Corps.  I delete this item.

I am deleting the $12,000,000 legislative augmentation that would
provide $1,000,000 to each of the 12 certified Local Conservation
Corps.  Notwithstanding the merit of the Local Corps programs, the
California Conservation Corps is still in the process of developing
grant guidelines for Proposition 84 bond funds.  Furthermore, a
recent audit of Proposition 12 and 40 bond funds identified a need
for the Corps to improve its oversight of bond expenditures.  The
audit recommended that the Corps develop a corrective action plan
prior to receiving additional bond funds.  Therefore, it is necessary
to delete this funding to ensure that bond proceeds are spent
efficiently, effectively, and in a manner consistent with my
Executive Order S-02-07 regarding bond accountability.  I support
funding for the Local Corps grant program when the grant guidelines
and a corrective action plan that identifies appropriate oversight
measures are in place.

Item 3360-001-0465 For Support, State Energy Resources Conservation
and Development Commission.  I revise this item by reducing:

(1)30-Development from $128,807,000 to $127,841,000, and

(6)Reimbursements from -$6,711,000 to -$5,745,000.

I am eliminating a fund shift of $966,000 from the Energy Resources
Programs Account to reimbursements for the support of two contracts.
Funding for these contracts was included in the budget of the Energy
Commission (Commission) when I introduced the Governor s Budget last
January.  However, the Legislature removed the funds from the
Commission s budget, placed them in the budget of the Air Resources
Board, and indicated that the Commission may seek the funds by
contracting with the Air Resources Board.  This would have the effect
of requiring both the Commission and the Air Board to engage in
unnecessary work that would delay these important projects, and as
such is unacceptable.

Item 3600-001-0001 For support of Department of Fish and Game.  I
reduce this item from $84,503,000 to $82,998,000 by reducing:

(3)30-Management of Department Lands and Facilities from $54,180,000
to $53,342,000;

(4)40-Enforcement from $61,705,000 to $60,200,000; and

(22)Amount payable from the Coastal Wetlands Account (Item
3600-001-3104) from $974,000 to -$136,000.

I am reducing the $3,000,000 legislative augmentation for Fish and
Game Warden recruitment and retention by $1,505,000.  Last year, for
the first time in several years, I increased salaries by 25 percent
during the three years of the bargaining agreement.  I am sustaining
$1,495,000 to provide overtime funding for wardens and lieutenants,
which continues my commitment to address compensation issues.
However, this partial veto is necessary in order to further build a
prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and
spending that we face this year.

I am also revising this item to conform to the actions I have taken
in Item 36000013104.

Item 3600-001-3104 For support of Department of Fish and Game.  I
reduce this item from $974,000 to $136,000.

I am deleting the $838,000 legislative augmentation for the
maintenance and management of Department of Fish and Game coastal
wetlands properties.  Last year, I sustained a $5,000,000 transfer
from the General Fund to the Coastal Wetlands Account to create an
endowment to provide ongoing, sustainable funding for coastal
wetlands management activities.  This augmentation, if sustained for
2007-08 and continued in future years, would spend down the endowment
in approximately six years, and place additional cost pressure on
the General Fund at that time.  With this reduction,
$1,400,000 million and 18.1 positions remain for coastal wetlands
management.

Item 3720-001-0001 For support of California Coastal Commission.  I
reduce this item from $11,881,000 to $11,501,000 by reducing:

(1)10 Coastal Management Program from $15,909,000 to $15,529,000.

I am deleting the $380,000 legislative augmentation for coastal
enforcement.  The California Coastal Commission has the authority to
adjust its fees, and I am willing to consider augmentations that
address the Commission's workload needs once fees have been adjusted
to cover associated costs.  Currently, however, the proposed
augmentation would result in additional General Fund costs.  This
reduction is necessary in order to further build a prudent reserve in
light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we
face this year.  With this reduction $15,529,000 still remains to
support the Commission s coastal management program.

Item 3780-001-0001 For support of Native American Heritage
Commission.  I reduce this item from $970,000 to $770,000 by
reducing:

(1)10 Native American Heritage Commission from $975,000 to $775,000.

I am deleting the $200,000 legislative augmentation for 2.0 positions
to implement legislative mandates.  This reduction is necessary in
order to further build a prudent reserve in light of the various
uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.  With
this reduction $775,000 remains to support the Native American
Heritage Commission.

Item 3790-301-6051 For capital outlay, Department of Parks and
Recreation.  I reduce this item from $60,878,000 to $45,878,000 by
reducing:

(3.7)90.RS.412-Statewide: State Park System Opportunity and Inholding
Acquisitions Acquisition from $30,000,000 to $15,000,000.

I am vetoing $15,000,000 of the $25,000,000 augmentation to allow the
Department sufficient resources for opportunity purchases and
inholding acquisitions.  The Department expended $324,000,000 between
2000 and 2006 to acquire nearly 100,000 acres to expand the state
park system.  Given this recent significant investment, the
Department should proceed cautiously to limit future operating costs.

Item 3790-492 Reappropriation, Department of Parks and Recreation.  I
revise this item by deleting Schedule 1.

"Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the period to liquidate
encumbrances in the following citation is extended as cited below:
6029--California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and
Coastal Protection Fund
(1) Subdivision (b) of Section 2 of Chapter 1126 of the Statutes of
2002.  The liquidation period for the grant of $3,000,000 to the City
of Oroville is extended to December 31, 2009."

I am eliminating the expenditure availability for this project funded
from the Proposition 40 Historical and Cultural Resources
Preservation Opportunity Grant Program.  Funds for this project have
been available for five years and have not yet been spent.

Item 3860-001-0001 For support of Department of Water Resources.  I
revise this item by reducing:

(1)10-Continuing Formulation of the California Water Plan from
$120,292,000 to $116,047,000, and

(29)Amount payable from the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and
Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Fund of 2006
(Item 3860-001-6051) from $12,165,000 to $7,920,000.

I am revising this item to conform to the action taken in Item
3860-001-6051.

Item 3860-001-6051 For support of Department of Water Resources.  I
reduce this item from $12,165,000 to $7,920,000.

I am deleting the legislative augmentation of $4,245,000 for
watershed basin planning activities.  Although I support this
program, I believe that these activities should be funded through
Proposition 84 funds available for the development of regional and
local land use plans.  Statewide water planning activity funds should
be reserved for activities such as planning future water storage,
adaptations of the state s water systems to climate change, and other
activities that address the state s future water supply needs.

Item 3860-101-6051 For local assistance, Department of Water
Resources.  I reduce this item from $229,340,000 to $219,340,000.

I am deleting the legislative augmentation of $10,000,000 for the
Flood Protection Corridor Program.  My proposal includes $24,000,000
Proposition 84 funds for projects to implement Flood Protection
Corridor Program.  This funding is sufficient to meet the needs of
the program for the budget year, and I will propose additional funds
to implement Flood Protection Corridor projects in future budgets.

Item 3860-101-6052 For local assistance, Department of Water
Resources.  I reduce this item from $197,450,000 to $167,450,000.

I am deleting the legislative augmentation of $30,000,000 for the
Floodway Corridor Program.  This augmentation is unnecessary because
criteria have not been developed for this new program created by
Proposition 1E.  Thus, it is not feasible for grants to be solicited
and awarded during the fiscal year.  The Department of Water
Resources will develop criteria for this program during the fiscal
year, and funds to implement Floodway Corridor Program projects will
be included in future budgets.

Item 3900-001-0465 For support of State Air Resources Board.  I
delete this item.

I am eliminating this item by reducing $966,000 in funding from the
Energy Resources Programs Account.  This funding was intended to
support two contracts that were proposed in the budget of the Energy
Commission when I introduced the Governor's Budget last January.
However, the Legislature removed the funds from the Commission's
budget, placed them in the budget of the Air Resources Board, and
indicated that the Commission may seek the funds by contracting with
the Air Resources Board.  This would have the effect of requiring
both the Commission and the Air Board to engage in unnecessary work
that would delay these important projects, and as such is
unacceptable.

Item 3900-001-6053 For support of State Air Resources Board.

I am sustaining the legislative augmentation of an additional
$96,500,000 provided for school bus replacement and retrofits to
reduce the air pollution emissions of older, highpolluting school
buses.  However, I note a concern with respect to the ability of the
State Air Resources Board to allocate almost $200 million in
lower-emission school bus funding within the next two years.  It is
important that we do not sacrifice accountability in the interests of
expediency.  Therefore, while acknowledging the challenge that the
State Air Resources Board faces in distributing these funds, I am
directing the State Air Resources Board to allocate these funds
expeditiously while ensuring consistency with the accountability
safeguards identified in my Executive Order S0207 for the bonds that
were approved by the voters in the November 2006 general election.

Item 3900-001-6054 For support of State Air Resources Board.

I am sustaining the legislative augmentation of an additional
$139,000,000 provided for trade corridor emissions reductions to be
expended in the budget year for this new program authorized by the
voters in Proposition 1B in the November 2006 general election.
Proposition 1B provides $1 billion to fund projects intended to
improve air quality along four of California s major transportation
corridors:  from the Los Angeles ports to the Inland Empire, State
Route 99 in the Central Valley, the San Francisco Bay Area, and the
San Diego border region.  The State Air Resources Board will be
developing program guidelines and will solicit project proposals.
The projects to be funded are intended to achieve air quality
improvements above and beyond anything required by current law or
regulation.

The travelers on our busy trade corridors and the individuals who
reside along their routes are demanding relief now not many years
from now.  However, I am concerned about taxing the ability of the
State Air Resources Board to develop program guidelines and allocate
$250,000,000 in the 2007-08 fiscal year.  We must ensure effective
expenditure of this bond funding.  It is important that we do not
sacrifice accountability in the interests of expediency.  Therefore,
while acknowledging the challenge that the State Air Resources Board
faces in distributing these funds, I am directing the State Air
Resources Board to ensure that this funding be allocated consistent
with the accountability safeguards identified in my Executive Order
S02-07 for all bond funds approved by the voters in the November 2006
general election.

I am requesting the State Air Resources Board to develop program administrative
guidelines that make sense, reduce bureaucratic red tape, simplify and expedite project
application and award procedures, and ensure projects are completed in record time. The
people who voted for Proposition 1B are demanding this action. I know that my colleagues
in the Legislature agree with these goals, and that the staff of the State Air Resources
Board is up to this challenge.

In addition, because the language adopted by the Legislature relies heavily on local and
regional entities to carry out this program, I am calling on those entities to work closely
with the State Air Resources Board and ensure they are prepared to submit applications
to receive and allocate funding as soon as possible in this fiscal year.

Item 4260-001-0001—For support of Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $136,412,000 to $136,218,000 by reducing:
(1) 20-Health Care Services from $385,348,000 to $382,971,000;
(6) Amount payable from the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Fund (Item 4260-
001-0080) from -$198,000 to -$142,000;
(8) Amount payable from the Federal Trust Fund (Item 4260-001-0890) from -
$224,133,000 to -$224,036,000;
and by deleting:
(10) Amount payable from the California Discount Prescription Drug Program Fund
(Item 4260-001-8040) (-$2,030,000);
and Provision 4.

I am deleting the $56,000 legislative augmentation to restore 1.0 special funded position
that was redirected from the Department of Health Services (DHS) to the new Department
of Health Care Services. This will ensure the split of the DHS into two departments remains
budget-neutral, consistent with the intent of Chapter 241, Statutes of 2006 (SB 162). This
action is consistent with the deletion of $744,000 and 11.0 positions in the Department
of Public Health.

I am also reducing $56,000 in Item 4260-001-0080 to conform to this action.
Provision 4 prohibits the Department of Health Care Services from expending any funds
to relocate the Fresno Medi-Cal Field Office. I am deleting Provision 4 because it interferes
with the Executive Branch’s ability to effectively administer programs. Maintaining the
Department’s ability to consolidate operations is an important component of increasing
operational efficiencies.

I am deleting $195,000 ($98,000 General Fund and $97,000 Federal Trust Fund) and
2.0 positions for the implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB 437), which
included a pilot program for self-certification of income at enrollment for Medi-Cal and
development of feasibility study reports to begin implementing changes to several automated
eligibility systems. While I remain committed to implementation of these reforms,
this reduction is needed to build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in
revenues and spending that we face this year. I am directing the Department of Health
Care Services to delay implementation for one year.

In order to further build a prudent reserve, I am deleting $2,030,000 intended to
specifically fund implementation costs for the California Discount Prescription Drug
Program. I am directing the Department of Health Care Services to identify resources to
move forward with implementation.

I am also deleting Item 4260-001-8040 to conform to this action.

I am deleting $96,000 General Fund intended to fund implementation costs for the
California Rx Prescription Drug Website Program and am directing the Department of
Health Care Services to delay implementation of the program for one year.
Item 4260-001-0080—For support of Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $198,000 to $142,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4260-001-0001.

Item 4260-001-0890—For support of Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $224,133,000 to $224,036,000.

I am reducing this item by $97,000 to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4260-
001-0001, related to the delayed implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB
437).

Item 4260-001-8040—For support of Department of Health Care Services. I delete this
item.

I am deleting this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4260-001-0001
regarding the California Discount Prescription Drug Program.

Item 4260-006-0001—For transfer by the Controller to the California Discount Prescription
Drug Program Fund. I delete this item and Provision 1.

I am deleting the $6,330,000 in this item to conform to the actions I have taken in Items
4260-001-0001, 4260-001-8040, and 4260-119-8040 regarding the California Discount
Prescription Drug Program.

I am also deleting Provision 1 to conform to this action.

Item 4260-101-0001—For local assistance, Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $14,313,728,000 to $13,903,340,000 by reducing:
(1) 20.10.010-Eligibility (County Administration) from $2,660,676,000 to
$2,633,842,000;
(3) 20.10.030-Benefits (Medical Care and Services) from $32,222,681,000 to
$31,447,632,000; and
(8) Amount payable from the Federal Trust Fund (Item 4260-101-0890) from -
$20,595,964,000 to -$20,204,469,000.

I am deleting the legislative augmentation of $4,260,000 ($2,130,000 General Fund
and $2,130,000 Federal Trust Fund) for workstation replacement to conform to the action
taken in Item 5180-141-0001.

I am deleting $106,286,000 ($53,143,000 General Fund and $53,143,000 Federal Trust
Fund) of the funding for rates for managed health care plans in the Medi-Cal Program.
This reduction is necessary to provide for a prudent General Fund reserve in light of the
various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year. With this reduction,
$108,000,000 ($54,000,000 General Fund) still remains to fund rate increases for plans
to ensure adequate access to care for low-income Californians.

I am reducing the Medi-Cal Program by $644,893,000 ($331,893,000 General Fund
and $313,000,000 Federal Trust Fund). This reduction is necessary to provide for a prudent
General Fund reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that
we face this year. This reduction is based on historical data showing that on average over
the last three fiscal years, Medi-Cal expenditures have been more than $400 million
General Fund lower than the estimate.

I am deleting $26,792,000 ($13,396,000 General Fund and $13,396,000 Federal Trust
Fund) to delay the implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB 437), which included
a pilot program for self-certification of income at enrollment for Medi-Cal and
development of feasibility study reports to begin implementing changes to several automated
eligibility systems. This action will delay implementation of SB 437 for one year.
This reduction is necessary to provide for a prudent General Fund reserve in light of the
various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.

I am reducing the $19,652,000 ($9,826,000 General Fund and $9,826,000 Federal Trust
Fund) in funding for the county grants portion of the Children’s Outreach Initiative. This
appropriation reduction is necessary to provide for a prudent General Fund reserve in light
of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year. With this reduction,
$147,020,000 ($64,680,000 General Fund) still remains to fund other components
of the Children’s Outreach Initiative that streamline enrollment processes, improve retention,
and support county-based enrollment efforts for children. The Department of Health
Care Services will pay for any valid county claims for the Children’s Outreach Initiative
for the 2006-07 fiscal year from remaining funds within this item.
Item 4260-101-0890—For local assistance, Department of Health Care Services.

I reduce this item from $20,595,964,000 to $20,204,469,000.

I am reducing this item by $391,495,000 to conform to the action I have taken in Item
4260-101-0001.

Item 4260-111-0001—For local assistance, Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $172,616,000 to $162,616,000 by reducing:
(3) 20.35-Primary and Rural Health from $53,289,000 to $43,289,000,
and by deleting Provision 3.

I am reducing $10,000,000 General Fund from Expanded Access to Primary Care
(EAPC) in order to help build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in
revenues and spending that we face this year. I will seek a subsequent bill this session to
fund this program with Proposition 99 funding and maintain a constant level of funding
in the program.
Provision 3 directs the Department of Health Care Services to work with various constituency
groups to resolve issues with the timely discharge of patients enrolled in the
California Children’s Services Program. This requirement would result in an expenditure
increase without regard to the availability of revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing this
language.
Given the Legislature’s interest in this area and the importance of this program, I am
instructing the director of the Department of Health Care Services to continue the activities
of this legislative request to the extent such activities can be achieved using existing resources
and without impairing the Department of Health Care Services ability to perform
its essential functions.

Item 4260-113-0001—For local assistance, Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $190,394,000 to $185,171,000 by reducing:
(1) 20.10.010-Eligibility (County Administration) from $20,783,000 to $5,860,000,
and
(4) Amount payable from the Federal Trust Fund (Item 4260-113-0890) from -
$330,184,000 to -$320,484,000.

I am reducing the $14,923,000 ($5,223,000 General Fund and $9,700,000 Federal Trust
Fund) in funding for the county grants portion of the Children’s Outreach Initiative to
conform to the action I have taken in Item 4260-101-0001. The Department of Health
Care Services will pay for any valid county claims for the Children’s Outreach Initiative
for the 2006-07 fiscal year from remaining funds within this item.

Item 4260-113-0890—For local assistance, Department of Health Care Services. I reduce
this item from $330,184,000 to $320,484,000.

I am reducing this item by $9,700,000 to conform to the action I have taken in Item
4260-113-0001.

Item 4260-119-8040—For local assistance, Department of Health Care Services. I
delete this item.

I am deleting the $4,300,000 intended specifically to fund local assistance implementation
costs for the California Discount Prescription Drug Program. This action is necessary
to further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and
spending that we face this year.

Item 4265-001-0001—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $96,897,000 to $95,460,000 by reducing:
(2) 20-Public and Environmental Health from $504,804,000 to $502,502,000;
(3) 30-Licensing and Certification from $151,366,000 to $150,935,000;
(6) Reimbursements from $-36,726,000 to $-36,605,000;
(14) Amount payable from the Radiation Control Fund (Item 4265-001-0075) from -
$22,620,000 to -$22,402,000;
(16) Amount payable from the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Fund (Item 4265-
001-0080) from -$9,471,000 to -$9,368,000;
(18) Amount payable from the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund (Item 4265-001-
0098) from -$5,571,000 to -$5,517,000;
(24) Amount payable from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund (Item 4265-001-0203)
from -$113,633,000 to -$113,577,000;
(31) Amount payable from the Safe Drinking Water Account (Item 4265-001-0306)
from -$11,383,000 to -$11,204,000;
(37) Amount payable from the Federal Trust Fund (Item 4265-001-0890) from -
$212,090,000 to -$211,956,000;
(41) Amount payable from the Licensing and Certification Trust Fund (Item 4265-001-
3098) from -$84,033,000 to -$83,602,000;
and by deleting Provision 6.

I am reducing the $744,000 legislative augmentation to restore 11.0 special funded
positions that were redirected from the Department of Health Services (DHS) to administrative
and managerial positions in the new Department of Health Care Services and Department
of Public Health. This will ensure the split of the DHS into two departments remains
budget-neutral, consistent with the intent of Chapter 241, Statutes of 2006 (SB
162). This action is consistent with the deletion of $56,000 and 1.0 position in the Department
of Health Care Services.

I am also reducing $218,000 in Item 4265-001-0075, $103,000 in Item 4265-001-0080,
$54,000 in Item 4265-001-0098, $56,000 in Item 4265-001-0203, $179,000 in Item 4265-
001-0306, and $134,000 in Item 4265-001-0890 to conform to this action.

I am also reducing $1,314,000 and 9.0 positions to reflect a delay in implementation
of the Healthcare Associated Infections Program under Chapter 526, Statutes of 2006 (SB
739) for one year. This action is necessary to help build a prudent reserve in light of the
various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.

I am also reducing $431,000 and 3.0 positions in Item 4265-001-3098 to conform to
this action.

I am reducing $123,000 General Fund and 2.0 positions for the implementation of
Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB 437), which required development of feasibility study
reports to implement changes to several automated eligibility systems. I am taking this
action to delay implementation for one year in order to further build a prudent reserve in
light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.

I am also deleting Provision 6 which would require the Department of Public Health
to provide an action plan to the Legislature by November 1, 2007, and addresses temporary
management appointment issues identified by the Bureau of State Audits. This requirement
would result in an expenditure increase without regard to the availability of revenues.
Consequently, I am vetoing this language. Nevertheless, in recognition of the Legislature’s
desire to obtain this information, I am instructing the director of the Department of Public
Health to comply with this legislative request to the extent compliance can be achieved
using existing resources and without impairing the department’s ability to perform its essential
functions.

Item 4265-001-0075—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $22,620,000 to $22,402,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4265-001-0001.

Item 4265-001-0080—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $9,471,000 to $9,368,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4265-001-0001.

Item 4265-001-0098—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $5,571,000 to $5,517,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4265-001-0001.

Item 4265-001-0203—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $113,633,000 to $113,577,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4265-001-0001.

Item 4265-001-0306—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $11,383,000 to $11,204,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4265-001-0001.

Item 4265-001-0890—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $212,090,000 to $211,956,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4265-001-0001.

Item 4265-001-3098—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $84,033,000 to $83,602,000.

I am reducing this item by $431,000 and 3.0 positions to conform to the action I have
taken in Item 4265-001-0001 related to the Healthcare Associated Infections Program.

Item 4265-111-0001—For support of Department of Public Health. I reduce this item
from $273,999,000 to $265,499,000 by reducing:
(1) 10.10-Emergency Preparedness from $198,220,000 to $189,720,000.
In order to further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues
and spending that we face this year, I am reducing $8,500,000 from this item on a onetime
basis from the ongoing discretionary funding provided for allocation to local health
departments for local pandemic influenza preparedness and response planning. Even with
this reduction, $10,000,000 remains to fund local health departments’ emergency preparedness
activities. In addition, $8,500,000 remains to provide storage to protect the state’s
investment in medical supplies and equipment to address health care surge capacity needs.

Item 4280-001-0001—For support of Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board. I reduce
this item from $2,516,000 to $2,400,000 by reducing:
(3) 40-Healthy Families Program from $9,495,000 to $9,162,000, and
(9) Amount payable from Federal Trust Fund (Item 4280-001-0890) from -$7,000,000
to -$6,783,000.

I am reducing $333,000 ($116,000 General Fund and $217,000 Federal Trust Fund)
and 3.0 positions for the implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB 437) which
provided for a program to test self-certification of income at the Annual Eligibility Review
for the Healthy Families Program. I am directing the Managed Risk Medical Insurance
Board to delay implementation for one year to contribute to a prudent reserve in light of
the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.

Item 4280-001-0890—For support of Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board. I reduce
this item from $7,000,000 to $6,783,000.

I am reducing this item by $217,000 to conform to my actions in 4280-001-0001, related
to the delayed implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB 437).

Item 4280-101-0890—For local assistance, Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board.

I reduce this item from $732,337,000 to $729,841,000.

I am reducing this item by $2,496,000 to conform to the action I have taken in Item
4280-101-0001, related to the delayed implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006
(SB 437).

Item 4280-102-0001—For local assistance, Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board.

I reduce this item from $26,520,000 to $26,240,000 by reducing:
(1) 40-Healthy Families Program from $75,190,000 to $74,396,000, and
(3) Amount payable from the Federal Trust Fund (Item 4280-102-0890) from -
$41,053,000 to -$40,539,000.

I am deleting $794,000 ($280,000 General Fund and $514,000 Federal Trust Fund) to
conform to the action I have taken in Item 4280-001-0001, related to the delayed implementation
of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB 437).

Item 4280-102-0890—For local assistance, Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board.

I reduce this item from $41,053,000 to $40,539,000.

I am reducing this item by $514,000 to conform to the action I have taken in Item 4280-
102-0001, related to the delayed implementation of Chapter 328, Statutes of 2006 (SB
437).

Item 4440-101-0001—For local assistance, Department of Mental Health. I revise this
item from $518,723,000 to $463,873,000 by reducing:
(1) 10.25-Community Services—Other Treatment from $705,124,000 to $638,274,000,
and
(6) Reimbursements from -$1,132,671,000 to -$1,120,671,000.

I am deleting the $54,850,000 legislative augmentation for the Integrated Services for
Homeless Adults with Serious Mental Illness Program. While I support the goals of the
program, this reduction is necessary to limit program expansions and to help bring ongoing
expenditures in line with existing resources. To the extent counties find this program
beneficial and cost-effective, it can be restructured to meet the needs of each county’s
homeless population using other county funding sources, such as federal funds, realignment
funds, or Proposition 63 funds.

I am reducing Schedule (6) to eliminate the $12,000,000 legislative augmentation for
the 5 percent rate restoration for mental health managed care. This technical veto is consistent
with the legislative action taken in Item 4440-103-0001.

Item 4700-001-0001—For support of Department of Community Services and Development.

I reduce this item from $250,000 to $150,000 by reducing:
(1) 47-Naturalization Services from $250,000 to $150,000.

I am deleting the $100,000 legislative augmentation to expand the Naturalization Services
Program. This action is necessary for a prudent reserve for economic uncertainties.
With this reduction, $3,000,000 still remains to support the Naturalization Services Program,
and to assist legal immigrants in completing their citizenship application, citizenship
testing, and in preparing for the interview. In addition, similar services are provided by
the California Department of Education, such as instruction in civics and English.

I am also taking conforming action to reduce Item 4700-101-0001.

Item 4700-101-0001—For local assistance, Department of Community Services and
Development. I reduce this item from $4,750,000 to $2,850,000 by reducing:
(1) 47-Naturalization Services from $4,750,000 to $2,850,000.

I am reducing this item by $1,900,000 to conform to my action in Item 4700-001-0001.
Item 5180-001-0001—For support of Department of Social Services. I reduce this item
from $102,904,000 to $102,717,000 by reducing:
 (2) 25-Social Services and Licensing from $161,486,000 to $161,212,000;
(8) Amount payable from the Federal Trust Fund (Item 5180-001-0890) from -
$347,576,000 to -$347,489,000;
and by deleting Provision 8.

I am reducing this item by $274,000 ($187,000 General Fund and $87,000 Federal Trust
Fund) for 3.0 positions on a one-time basis. This funding would have provided resources
for the Department of Social Services to assist in sibling searches within the Adoptions
Program, pursuant to legislation enacted during fiscal year 2006-07. While I support efforts
to remove barriers to sibling reunification and facilitate the release of information between
siblings, I am delaying implementation of this program for one year in order to further
build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that
we face this year. I am reducing Item 5180-151-0001 by $1,046,000 and Item 5180-151-
0890 by $794,000 to conform to this action.
Provision 8 requires the Department of Social Services to display legal accusations
filed by the Department against a provider’s license on the Community Care Licensing
public website pages as a condition to spending set-aside funding of $1,475,000 to implement
its Licensing Reform Automation proposal. I am delaying implementation of this
project for one year, to provide for a prudent General Fund reserve in light of the various
uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year. I am also deleting the provisional
language related to this project funding.

Item 5180-001-0890—For support of Department of Social Services. I reduce this item
from $347,576,000 to $347,489,000 and delete Provision 4.

I am reducing this item to conform to the action I have taken in Item 5180-001-0001
related to sibling searches within the Adoptions Program.

I am deleting Provision 4 to conform to the action I have taken in Item 5180-001-0001
related to licensing reform automation costs.

Item 5180-151-0890—For local assistance, Department of Social Services. I reduce
this item from $1,222,557,000 to $1,218,641,000.

I am reducing this item to conform to the actions I have taken in Item 5180-151-0001
related to workstation replacement, sibling searches within the Adoptions Program, and
foster youth identify theft.

Item 5180-153-0001—For local assistance, Department of Social Services. I revise this
item by deleting Provision 2.
Provision 2 requires the Department of Social Services to collaborate with stakeholders
to develop the timeline, components, and execution of the evaluation of the Title IV-E
Waiver. This requirement would result in an expenditure increase without regard to the
availability of revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing this language. Nevertheless, I am
directing the Department to work with stakeholders to facilitate the successful implementation
of the Title IV-E Waiver, which allows participating counties flexibility in using
federal Title IV-E foster care funds for direct services and supports.

Item 5225-001-0001—For support of the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation. I reduce this Item from $6,980,353,000 to $6,958,609,000 by reducing:
(1) 10-Corrections and Rehabilitation Administration from $376,992,000 to
$369,580,000;
(4) 20-Juvenile Operations from $183,097,300 to $181,168,300;
(8) 25-Adult Corrections and Rehabilitation Operations from $4,904,883,000 to
$4,892,480,000;
and by revising Provisions 10 and 16 and deleting Provisions 8, 11, and 19.

I am reducing funds for the second phase of the Consolidated Information Technology
Infrastructure Project by $4,408,000 and eliminating the $3,004,000 augmentation for the
Division of Juvenile Justice Infrastructure Migration Project. In addition, I am reducing
the augmentation provided for facility maintenance and special repair projects by
$10,000,000 and eliminating $4,332,000 for equipment replacement. These reductions
are necessary in order to further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties
in revenues and spending that we face this year. I am revising Provisions 10 and 16 to
conform to these actions as follows:
“10. In implementing the Consolidated Information Technology Infrastructure Project
(CITIP), the department shall, when possible, give first priority to data drops for business
services and rehabilitative programming. Of the funds appropriated in this item, $4,408,000
may not be expended sooner than 30 days after the department provides a report to the
Joint Legislative Budget Committee certifying that CITIP design and engineering work
has been completed at 12 institutions. This report shall also identify the revised cost estimates
to implement the CITIP at these 12 institutions as compared to the original estimated
costs. The report shall also identify the reasons for any differences between the original
and revised estimates.”
“16. Of the funds appropriated in this item, $698,514,000 $679,774,000 is available
for expenditure only for the purposes identified below. Any unexpended funds shall revert
to the General Fund.
(a) Facility Maintenance Funding: $46,000,000 $36,000,000
(b) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, Administrative Segregation Unit Mental Health Cells
Modification: $3,550,000
(c) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, Administrative Segregation Intake Cells: $13,203,000
(d) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, Salary Enhancements: $13,108,000
(e) Plata v. Schwarzenegger: Salary Enhancements: $1,521,000
(f) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, CMF Acute Cells Modification: $1,075,000
(g) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger: Reception Center Enhanced Outpatient Program:
$2,916,000
(h) Perez v. Tilton, Comprehensive Inmate Dental Services Program: $8,477,000
(i) Farrell v. Tilton, Safety and Welfare Remedial Plan: $66,747,000
(j) Farrell v. Tilton, Mental Health Remedial Plan: $25,145,000
(k) Implementation of Revised Program Guide for Mental Health Services Delivery
System (Ch. 511, Stats. 2006): $8,706,000
(l) Sex Offender Management Funding: $113,327,000
(m) Reducing Recidivism Strategies: $90,136,000
(1) The department is authorized to make changes to the Reducing Recidivism Strategies
supported by this subdivision not sooner than 15 days after notifying the fiscal committees
of both houses of the Legislature of any proposed changes.
(n) Basic Correctional Officer Academy: $61,105,000
(o) Records Staffing and Automation: $7,759,000
(p) Garrison Johnson v. California, Racial Integration: $1,214,000
(q) Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, Court Order Compliance: $2,325,000
(r) Comprehensive Health Care Recruitment: $3,928,000
(s) Life Prisoner Parole Hearing Staffing: $6,646,000
(t) Farrell v. Tilton Healthcare Remedial Plan: $9,064,000
(u) Farrell v. Tilton, Consent Decree: $1,327,000
(v) Strategic Offender Management System: $3,611,000
(w) Consolidated Information Technology Infrastructure Project: $118,466,000
$114,058,000
(x) Teacher Pay Parity: $13,868,000
(y) Equipment Funding: $4,332,000
(z) Mandatory Aftercare/Drug Treatment Furlough: $65,615,000
(aa) Valdivia Case Records: $3,344,000
(bb) Perez v. Tilton, Salary Enhancements: $1,999,000”

I am deleting Provision 8, which would require the Department to pass along a portion
of its 2.7-percent price increase to public community correctional facilities under contract
with the Department. The Budget no longer contains funding for a price increase for the
Department. Therefore, this language is unnecessary.

I am deleting Provision 11, which would allow the Department to submit a staffing plan
to conduct background investigations and would preclude the use of sworn staff from
being utilized. The Department’s use of sworn staff to conduct background investigations
has improved the processing time that it takes to conduct a background investigation as
compared to non-sworn staff previously used. Because sworn staff have proved to be
more effective than non-sworn classifications, and due to the need to aggressively fill the
Department’s vacant Correctional Officer positions, this provision would prevent the
Department from managing their hiring process in a manner that allows Correctional Officer
vacancies to be filled in the most effective way possible.

I am deleting Provision 19, which would require the Department to submit a plan for
staffing and organizational changes in the Office of Facilities Management and other departmental
units to deliver capital outlay projects, including those authorized by Chapter
7, Statutes of 2007 (AB 900). This reporting requirement would result in an expenditure
increase without regard to the availability of revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing this
language. Nevertheless, in recognition of the Legislature’s desire to obtain this information,
it will be addressed as though the request had been included in Supplemental Report
Language. Therefore, I am instructing the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation to comply with this legislative request for this report to the extent compliance
can be achieved using existing resources and without impairing the Department’s ability
to perform its essential functions.

Item 5225-002-0001—For support of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. I
reduce this Item from $2,126,132,000 to $2,124,612,000 by reducing:
(4.2) 50.20-Dental Services-Adult from $103,292,000 to $103,129,000;
(4.3) 50.30-Mental Health Services-Adult from $303,093,000 to $302,930,000; and
(4.5) 50.50-Dental and Mental Health Services Administration-Adult from $59,283,000
to $58,089,000.

I am deleting the $1,520,000 legislative augmentation to support positions to improve
hiring efforts within the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR)
Dental and Mental Health programs. While I am supportive of these activities, my budget
proposed to fund these limited-term positions using the salary savings available from the
vacancies within CDCR’s Dental and Mental Health programs.

I expect that the recruitment efforts of the Department of Personnel Administration,
the salary increases provided to dental and mental health classifications, and the hiring
efforts of the CDCR will greatly improve the CDCR’s ability to fill the vacancies within
these programs. As such, I recognize that funding these positions through salary savings
is only a short-term solution and it may be necessary to provide additional funding to
support these efforts in the future.

Item 5225-301-0001—For capital outlay, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

I am sustaining Provision 7, which requires the department to report to the Joint Legislative
Budget Committee with an update to the facility master plan for juvenile facilities.
This report will identify how the projects funded in the 2007-08 Budget implement the
master plan. While the department is committed to completing this valuable plan and has
every intention of providing the data, it will be unable to meet the October 31, 2007
deadline provided therein because of the necessary time constraints associated with compiling
the level of detail as required by this report. I am directing the department to prepare
and deliver the required report by February 29, 2008.

Item 5225-301-0660—For capital outlay, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

I reduce this item from $119,752,000 to $107,367,000 by deleting:
(5.1) 61.23.004-California State Prison, Corcoran: Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements—
Construction ($5,944,000), and
(5.2) 61.30.004-Centinela State Prison, Imperial: Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades—
Construction ($6,441,000).

I am deleting these two wastewater treatment plant projects from this item because they
cannot be funded with lease revenue bond financing, I am directing the Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation to fund both projects from the $300,000,000 General Fund
appropriation contained in Chapter 7, Statutes of 2007 (AB 900) for infrastructure improvements
at existing prisons. Should this action result in additional funding needs in order
to complete the infrastructure work at the various existing institutions, I expect that the
Legislature will be supportive of future funding requests.

Item 6110-001-0001—For support of Department of Education. I reduce this item from
$47,380,000 to $47,127,000 by reducing:
(1) 10-Instruction from $62,022,000 to $60,422,000;
(2) 20-Instructional Support from $103,209,000 to $99,833,000; and
(9) Amount payable from Federal Trust Fund (Item 6110-001-0890) from -$163,060,000
to -$158,337,000.

I am deleting the legislative augmentation of $133,000 and 1.0 position to coordinate
education programs for incarcerated youth and support implementation of alternative
school programs. This reduction is necessary to limit program expansion and in order to
further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and
spending that we face this year. Further, the Department of Education already has existing
positions that support alternative school programs and there is not sufficient workload
justification for this additional position.

I am deleting Provision 28 to conform to this action.

I am deleting the $120,000 legislative augmentation to support implementation of the
English language learner component of the Mathematics and Reading Professional Development
Program. Chapter 524, Statutes of 2006 (SB 472), appropriated $120,000 to the
Department of Education without regard to fiscal year and authorized the Department to
establish one position for this purpose. The Department has not filled the position and,
consequently, the $120,000 remains available for expenditure. Therefore, it is unnecessary
to provide additional expenditure authority in the budget year. However, I am sustaining
authority for 1.0 limited-term position for one year to enable the Department to fill the
position in order to conduct one-time activities associated with this program.

I am also revising this item to conform to the actions I have taken in Item 6110-001-
0890.

Item 6110-001-0890—For support of Department of Education. I reduce this item from
$163,060,000 to $158,337,000.

I am reducing a legislative augmentation by $198,000 in federal Title II funds and 6.0
positions to implement the Compliance, Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS)
program related to the highly qualified teacher requirements under the federal No Child
Left Behind Act. The Department of Education did not provide sufficient workload justification
for these positions. Further, the Legislature rejected the Administration’s proposal
to shift funding from federal Title V to Title II for 4.0 professional development positions,
with a priority on meeting the highly qualified teacher requirements, as Title V will no
longer be available to support these positions. Therefore, I am sustaining $929,000 to
support 2.0 new positions and the 4.0 existing but unfunded positions for the purpose of
assisting school districts to meet the highly qualified teacher requirements. When combined
with the positions that are currently dedicated for this purpose, the Department will have
a total of 8.0 positions for the CMIS program.

I am revising Provision 34 to conform to this action as follows:
“34. Of the funds appropriated in this item, $1,127,000 $929,000 of federal Title II
funds is for the Compliance, Monitoring, Intervention, and Sanctions (CMIS) program.
This program is designed to help school districts meet the highly qualified teacher requirements
specified in the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et
seq.). By April 1, 2008, the State Department of Education shall submit a report on the
CMIS program to the budget and policy committees. The report shall identify (a) the
number of school districts that received CMIS support in the 2007-08 fiscal year, and (b)
the major components of the plans that those districts developed to respond to the federal
highly qualified teacher requirements. For each participating district, the report also shall
provide longitudinal data on the number and percent of teachers who are and are not
highly qualified. At a minimum, the 2007-08 report shall include finalized data for the
2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 fiscal years, and initial data for the 2007-08 fiscal year.
The report shall provide data separately for high-poverty and low-poverty schools. For
comparison, the report shall provide the same longitudinal data for the statewide average
of all school districts as well as the average for school districts not receiving CMIS support.”

I am reducing this item by $1,600,000 and 4.0 positions to monitor and provide technical
assistance to alternative, county court, and Division of Juvenile Justice schools serving
English learners. An increase in staff to monitor these schools has not been justified.
Furthermore, monitoring and providing technical assistance for these schools is an ongoing
activity and the use of one-time monies would be inappropriate. With this veto, these
funds will be available to be distributed to local educational agencies for direct classroom
instruction of English learner students.

I am deleting Provision 37 to conform to this action.

I am technically revising Provision 39 to eliminate references stipulating that $450,000
of one-time funds is made available for special education dispute resolution contract “costof-
living increases”. This program does not receive a cost-of-living adjustment, but rather
receives funding on a workload basis. Accordingly, the funds will be used for addressing
new workload claims to ensure that the public receives prompt and appropriate due process
for consideration of dispute resolution matters, as required by law.

I am revising Provision 39 to conform as follows:
“39. Of the funds appropriated in this item, $450,000 is made available on a one-time
basis for the special education dispute resolution contract for cost-of-living increases. The
State Department of Education, in coordination with the Office of Administrative Hearings,
shall provide quarterly caseload and expenditure data to the appropriate budget committees
of the Legislature, the Department of Finance, and the Legislative Analyst’s Office by
March 1, 2008. The information shall also include updated budget detail and payment
provisions, as shown in Exhibit B of the interagency agreement.”

I am deleting the $150,000 legislative augmentation to provide an independent evaluation
of the special education dispute resolution services provided by the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The proposal essentially is a request for data, some of which is duplicative. Instead,

I am directing the Office of Administrative Hearings to provide the remaining data
requested using existing resources, including specified workload and mediator use data,
and efficiency options for the program.

I am deleting Provision 40 to conform to this action.

I am deleting the $1,050,000 legislative augmentation to expand special education focused
monitoring and technical assistance services in alternative, county court, and Division
of Juvenile Justice schools. This program essentially provides auditing for compliance
with individualized education plans and follow-up for necessary corrections. I am unable
to support this augmentation. Individualized education plan compliance should already
be a part of the Special Education program not only for alternative schools but in all educational
settings. Students are entitled to receive the quality services required by law and
included in their individual education plans. This particular funding should be allocated
instead to local grants to fund direct special education instruction.

I am deleting Provision 41 to conform to this action.

I am reducing this item to delete the legislative augmentation of $125,000 for a study
to identify options for improving indicators of student socioeconomic status. Because the
study is vague, I am concerned that $125,000 augmentation may not be adequate to
complete the study and may lead to future cost pressures to complete or expand the study.
With this veto, these funds will be available to be distributed to local educational agencies
for direct classroom instruction to improve the academic performance of schools. In lieu
of this funding, I request that the Legislative Analyst’s Office partner with the Department
of Finance to explore the issue with existing resources and staff.

I am deleting Provision 43 to conform to this action.

I am reducing this item by $350,000 and 4.0 positions for assistance to local educational
agencies (LEAs) that are expected to face federal No Child Left Behind corrective action
sanctions. Until more definitive results from a privately funded pilot project are available
and a resulting plan for expenditure of the local assistance dollars is fully developed, it is
premature to add staff to support these activities. Further, until the final determination is
made on how to allocate local assistance funding, it is not clear that it is necessary for the
State Department of Education to provide a higher level of assistance or that additional
positions are needed.

I am deleting Provision 44 to conform to this action.

I am reducing this item to delete the legislative augmentation of $300,000 intended to
support a pilot project that allows schools to use non-adopted reading language arts mate-
rials for English learner students. The proposed new program would allow the use of instructional
materials that are not aligned to state standards, which is a concern because
all students should have access to standards-aligned materials. In addition, an alternate
$20 million pilot project is already underway, and that project will be assessing what educational
practices work best for improving the academic performance of English learners.

I am deleting Provision 46 to conform to this action.

I am deleting the $400,000 legislative augmentation to create an advisory committee
and perform a best practices study that would assist local education agencies in implementing
evidence-based practices intended to assist students with specific learning disabilities
to improve academically. However, I believe local grants for direct instruction would be
a more prudent and timely use of this funding.

I am deleting Provision 47 to conform to this action.

I am reducing this item by $500,000 for an evaluation of the English Learner Best
Practices Pilot Program (Pilot) pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 561, Statutes of
2006 (AB 2117). During last year’s development of Assembly Bill 2117, which established
the Pilot, the understanding was that the evaluation would be funded by a not-for-profit
organization. However, this funding has not materialized. The legislative augmentation
of $1,000,000 for the evaluation appears to be excessive. Instead, I am sustaining $500,000
of the augmentation which would be consistent with similar evaluations done in the recent
past. I believe the evaluation is an important component of ensuring that the $20 million
Proposition 98 General Fund provided in the Budget Act of 2006 for the Pilot would
produce conclusions that could lead to improvements in English learner academic performance.

I am revising Provision 48 to conform to this action.
“48. Of the funds appropriated in this item, $1,000,000 $500,000 of one-time federal
Title III funds is available on a one-time basis for five years for an independent evaluation
administered by the State Department of Education pursuant to the requirements of
Chapter 561 of the Statues of 2006.”

I am reducing this item by $50,000 for an evaluation to ensure that local educational
agencies (LEAs) are employing methods to ensure effective and timely oral communication
with non-English-speaking parents. To the extent that this is a problem for LEAs, they
already receive federal funds that can be used for these purposes. Specifically, the Budget
includes over $165 million in federal Title III funds that can be used for parent outreach
activities such as interpreter services. With this veto, these funds will be available to be
distributed to LEAs for direct classroom instruction of English learner students.

I am deleting Provision 49 to conform to this action.
Item 6110-123-0001—For local assistance, Department of Education. I revise Provision
1 of this item.

I am deleting provisional language added by the Legislature that allocates funds to Intervention
Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP) schools that are still subject to
state sanctions and are working with school assistance and intervention teams (SAITs).
The last cohort of II/USP schools qualified for funding in 2002-03 and since that time,
some schools, even with the assistance of SAITs, still have not met bare minimum academic
benchmarks to improve student achievement and to exit the program. Consequently,
I do not believe that the state should continue to fund these activities given the efforts to
consolidate state and federal accountability programs. In addition, I am concerned that
the Legislature’s shift of these II/USP costs from another Budget item to this item may
create cost pressures within the II/USP successor program, the High Priority Schools
Grant Program. I continue to support focusing efforts on improving low-performing
schools and request that the State Board of Education assign the full spectrum of more
effective sanction strategies available under current law to these schools to help them
improve student achievement.

I am revising Provision 1 as follows to conform to this action.
“1. Funds appropriated in Schedule (1) are provided solely for the purpose of implementing
the High Priority Schools Grant Program pursuant to Article 3.5 (commencing
with Section 52055.600) of Chapter 6.1 of Part 28 of the Education Code. Of these funds,
$10,000,000 or whatever greater or lesser amount is necessary, shall be available to support
schools working with school assistance and intervention teams or schools subject to state
sanctions by the Superintendent of Public Instruction as part of the High Priority Schools
Grant Program or the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program.”

Item 6110-134-0890—For local assistance, Department of Education. I reduce this item
from $77,900,000 to $70,800,000 by deleting:
(7) 10.30.013-District Assistance and Intervention Teams ($7,100,000),
and by deleting Provision 9.

I am deleting $7,100,000 and setting these funds aside for appropriation in subsequent
legislation. This Legislative augmentation provided funding for District Assistance and
Intervention Teams (DAITs) to work with local educational agencies (LEAs) facing
sanctions under the federal accountability system. The augmentation is premature because
a privately funded pilot project and evaluation of the effectiveness of DAITs is underway.
Until the evaluation is completed, or an interim report shows that DAITs are effective, I
cannot support funding for these new activities. I recognize the problem of a growing
number of LEAs and schools entering federal No Child Left Behind sanctions and note
that funding is set aside in this item, pursuant to subsequent legislation, for implementation
of an effective plan that supports LEAs and schools and their attempts to improve the
academic performance of their students.

Item 6110-196-0001—For local assistance, Department of Education (Proposition 98).

I reduce this item from $1,761,366,000 to $1,756,366,000 by reducing:
(1) 30.10.010-Special Programs, Child Development, Preschool Education from
$418,644,000 to $413,644,000,
and by revising Provision 3 to conform.

I am reducing $5,000,000 from preschool programs and revising Provision 3 by eliminating
language that would expand the authorized use of these funds to include wraparound
child care for children participating in any state preschool program. These funds
were provided to continue support of the Pre-Kindergarten Family Literacy program
(PKFL) that was authorized by Chapter 211, Statutes of 2006 (AB 172) by providing ongoing
funding for full-day child care for children participating in the PKFL program (AB
172 utilized one-time funding to provide this service in 2006-07). I believe that making
these funds available to all preschool programs would undermine the PKFL program and
negatively impact the ability of families to participate in the program. I am therefore setting
these funds aside for legislation that would restore the priority for these funds to the PKFL
programs.

I am revising Provision 3 to conform to this action as follows:
“3. Of the amount appropriated in Schedule (1), $50,000,000 is available for pre-
Kindergarten and Family Literacy Preschool programs pursuant to Chapter 211 of the
Statutes of 2006. Of the amount appropriated in Schedule (1), $5,000,000 is available for
wraparound care in order to provide direct child care for children in the state preschool
program for the portion of the day that is not otherwise covered by services provided as
part of the state preschool program.”

Item 6120-211-0001—For local assistance, California State Library. I reduce this item
from $21,342,000 to $14,342,000 by reducing:
(1) 20.30-Direct Loan and Interlibrary Loan Programs from $18,616,000 to $11,616,000.

I am deleting $7,000,000 for Direct Loan and Interlibrary Loan services. This reduction
is necessary in order to further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties
in revenues and spending that we face this year.

Item 6120-221-0001—For local assistance, California State Library, Public Library
Foundation Program. I reduce this item from $22,360,000 to $14,360,000.

I am deleting the discretionary $1,000,000 legislative augmentation to the Public Library
Foundation. This reduction is necessary to limit program expansions and help bring ongoing
General Fund expenditures in line with existing resources. In addition, I am deleting
$7,000,000 in order to further build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties
in revenues and spending that we face this year.

Item 6440-001-0001—For support of University of California. I reduce this item from
$3,019,559,000 to $3,016,059,000 by reducing:
(1) Support from $2,936,063,000 to $2,932,563,000,
and by revising Provisions 11,13, and 24 and deleting Provisions 26 and 27.

I am deleting the legislative augmentations for agricultural research ($1,500,000) and
for oceanographic research at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography ($1,500,000) to limit
program expansions and to help bring ongoing expenditures in line with existing resources.
With these reductions, over $77,000,000 of state and university funds remains to support
agricultural research and over $9,700,000 of state and university funds remains to support
research at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography.

I am deleting provisions 26 and 27 to conform to these actions.

I am deleting $500,000 for UC-Mexico research, which represents the amount of
funding for the financing of a facility located in Mexico, in order to further build a prudent
reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this
year. The University of California should use other sources for this purpose at its discretion.

I am revising Provision 11 to conform as follows:
“11. Notwithstanding Section 3.00, for the term of the financing, the University of
California may use funds appropriated in Schedule (1) for debt service and costs associated
with the purchase, renovation, and financing of a facility for the UC-Mexico research and
academic programs in Mexico City. The amount to be financed shall not exceed $7,000,000.
The university shall report to the Legislature by March 15, 2008, on the (a) amount of
funds spent to support the UC-Mexico facility, including the specific use of these funds,
(b) amount of funds spent to support UC-Mexico research and academic programs, and
(c) different types of research conducted and programs operated at the UC-Mexico facility.”

I am sustaining the legislative augmentation of $19,300,000 for student academic
preparation and education programs. However, the reporting requirement would result in
an expenditure increase without regard to the availability of revenues. Consequently, I
am vetoing this language. Nevertheless, in recognition of the Legislature’s desire to obtain
this information, it will be addressed as though the request had been included in Supplemental
Report language. Therefore, I am instructing the President of the University of
California to comply with this legislative request for this report to the extent compliance
can be achieved using existing resources and without impairing the University’s ability
to perform its essential functions.

I am revising Provision 24 to conform as follows:
“24. Of the funds appropriated in Schedule (1), $19,300,000 is for student academic
preparation and education programs (SAPEP) and is to be matched with $12,000,000
from existing university resources, for a total of $31,300,000 for these programs. The
University of California shall provide a plan to the Department of Finance and the fiscal
committees of each house of the Legislature for expenditure of both state and university
funds for SAPEP by September 1, 2007. It is the intent of the Legislature that the university
report on the use of state and university funds provided for these programs, including
detailed information on the outcomes and effectiveness of academic preparation programs
consistent with the accountability framework developed by the university in April 2005.
The report shall be submitted to the fiscal committees of each house of the Legislature
not later than April 1, 2008.”

Finally, I am revising Provision 13 to delete language that describes a new methodology
for determining the marginal cost of each additional state-supported student in the future.
The new formula is not transparent, is too difficult to either replicate or verify allowing
for potential manipulation in future years, and does not properly reflect the full mix of
new faculty associated with the system-wide growth in students.

I am revising Provision 13 to conform as follows:
“13. Of the funds appropriated in Schedule (1), $52,930,000 is to fund 5,000 additional
state-supported full-time equivalent students (FTES) at the University of California, based
on a marginal General Fund cost of $10,586 per additional student. This funding rate is
based on a methodology for determining the marginal cost of each additional state-supported
student, as adopted by the Legislature for the 2006-07 fiscal year. This methodology
calculates a total marginal cost (including operation and maintenance costs and faculty
costs based on the salaries of recently hired professors) and then subtracts from this cost
the fee revenue the university anticipates from each additional student (after adjusting for
financial aid), in order to determine the amount of General Fund support needed from the
state. It is the intent of the Legislature that enrollment growth funding provided to the
university in subsequent fiscal years be based on this specific methodology. The Legislature
expects the University of California to enroll a total of 198,455 state-supported FTES
during the 2007-08 academic year. This enrollment target does not include nonresident
students and students enrolled in non-state-supported summer programs. The University
of California shall report to the Legislature by March 15, 2008, on whether it has met the
2007-08 enrollment goal. For purposes of this provision, enrollment totals shall only include
state-supported students. If the University of California does not meet its total state-supported
enrollment goal by at least 250 FTES, the Director of Finance shall revert to the
General Fund by April 1, 2008, the total amount of enrollment funding associated with
the total share of the enrollment goal that was not met.”

Item 6440-305-6048—For capital outlay, University of California.

I am sustaining the $10,000,000 provided for the Life Sciences Research and Nursing
Education Building in this item.

In my efforts to continue to support programs and projects that will alleviate the nursing
shortage California is suffering, I am sustaining this legislative augmentation for the
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science to build a Life Sciences Research
and Nursing Education Building. However, I note that a number of issues both legal and
programmatically need to be resolved before funds may be expended. Specifically, there
are legal concerns regarding the use of general obligation bonds for this project and may
require the state to acquire and maintain ownership of the facility being built. Additionally,
the nursing program that will utilize this facility needs to be fully developed before the
scope of this new facility can be generated. Until these concerns are resolved, no funds
for this project may be expended.

Item 6610-001-0001—For support of California State University. I revise this item by
revising Provision 7.

I am revising Provision 7 to delete language that describes a new methodology for determining
the marginal cost of each additional state-supported student in the future. The
new formula is not transparent, is too difficult to either replicate or verify allowing for
potential manipulation in future years, and does not properly reflect the full mix of new
faculty associated with the system-wide growth in students.

I am revising Provision 7 to conform as follows:
“7. Of the amount appropriated in Schedule (1), $64,417,000 is to fund 8,355 additional
state-supported full-time equivalent students (FTES) at the California State University
(CSU), based on a marginal General Fund cost of $7,710 per additional student. This
funding rate is based on a methodology for determining the marginal cost of each additional
state-supported student, as adopted by the Legislature for the 2006-07 fiscal year.
This methodology calculates a total marginal cost (including operation and maintenance
costs and faculty costs based on the salaries of recently hired professors) and then subtracts
from this cost the fee revenue the university anticipates from each additional student (after
adjusting for financial aid), in order to determine the amount of General Fund support
needed from the state. It is the intent of the Legislature that enrollment growth funding
provided to the university in subsequent fiscal years be based on this specific methodology.
The Legislature expects CSU to enroll a total of 342,553 state-supported FTES during
the 2007-08 academic year. This enrollment target does not include nonresident students
and students enrolled in non-state-supported summer programs. The CSU shall provide
a preliminary report to the Legislature by March 15, 2008, and a final report by May 1,
2008, on whether it has met the 2007-08 enrollment goal. For purposes of this provision,
enrollment totals shall only include state-supported students. If CSU does not meet its
total state-supported enrollment goal by at least 418 FTES, the Director of Finance shall
revert to the General Fund by May 15, 2008, the total amount of enrollment funding associated
with the total share of the enrollment goal that was not met.”

Item 6870-101-0001—For local assistance, Board of Governors of the California

Community Colleges, Proposition 98. I reduce this item from $3,906,649,000 to
$3,859,753,000 by reducing:
(1) 10.10.010-Apportionments from $3,093,135,000 to $3,079,349,000;
(2) 10.10.020-Basic Skills and Apprenticeship from $48,339,000 to $15,229,000;
and by deleting subdivision (c) of Provision 7.

I am reducing Schedule (1) by $13,786,000 and Schedule (2) by $33,110,000 to delete
the legislative augmentations for a noncredit course rate increase and a basic skills student
funding increase, respectively. However, I am setting these funds aside for legislation that
appropriates these funds for improving outcomes for at-risk students in a manner more
consistent with the priorities of my proposed Student Success Initiative ($33,110,000)
and the remainder for other more compelling Proposition 98 funding needs.
The Legislature’s proposed $13,786,000 augmentation to support a second consecutive
noncredit rate increase is premature and inconsistent with the agreement reached in last
year’s compromise on Chapter 631, Statutes of 2006 (SB 361). As part of that agreement,
my Administration indicated that any future noncredit rate increase would be subject to
improved student outcomes from last year’s initial investment of $30,000,000. To date,
no accountability measures have been developed to evaluate this investment, nor has my
Administration received a comprehensive list of courses and programs that have been
approved by the Chancellor’s Office for funding from the 2006-07 increase. While I
cannot sustain this augmentation, the budget does provide a 4.53-percent COLA, which,
when combined with the ongoing $30,000,000 increase from 2006-07, provides for a 23-
percent increase in per student funding for selected noncredit courses since the 2005-06
fiscal year.

I am deleting Provision 4.6 to conform to this action.

I cannot support the Legislature’s $33,110,000 redirection of funds proposed for my
May Revision’s Student Success Initiative because the accompanying control provisions
do not contain the appropriate accountability and distribution mechanisms necessary to
ensure this investment improves student outcomes, particularly for at-risk students transitioning
from high schools. With this reduction, the community colleges still retain
$33,110,000 in unspent current year funds that carryover for expenditure in the budget
year to address strategies for improving basic skills instruction. My Administration is
prepared to work with the Chancellor’s Office to reinstate the ongoing funding pending
agreement on revised accountability and distribution provisions that address my priority
for improving meaningful outcomes for students transitioning from high school.

I am deleting subdivision (c) of provision 7 to conform to this action.

Item 6870-486—Reappropriation, Proposition 98, Board of Governors of the California
Community Colleges. I reduce this item from $26,668,000 to $21,168,000 by deleting
legislative augmentations for the Part-time Faculty Health Insurance Program in Schedule
(4) and the proposed Construction College Pilot Program in Schedule (6).

I am deleting the one-time augmentation of $4,000,000 from the Proposition 98 Reversion
Account for the Part-time Faculty Health Insurance Program because this program
was established as an incentive grant program to encourage additional district investments
in benefits for part-time faculty. However, these programs were not intended to require
additional one-time or ongoing contributions from the state. Given the significant general
purpose increases provided in this Budget for community colleges, I believe that districts
have sufficient resources to provide additional benefits to part-time faculty at their discretion.

I am also deleting the one-time augmentation of $1,500,000 for a Construction College
pilot program at San Jose City College and another, unspecified site. While this program
may have merit from a local perspective, significant investments are already proposed for
apprenticeship and pre-apprenticeship programs, as well as traditional K-12 career path
programs including construction technology, within my anticipated 2007-08 Career
Technical Education Initiative expenditure plan. Additional funding for a constructionspecific
program would establish an undesirable precedent for singling out a local project
for funding without competing for limited resources with other meritorious local projects.
It is also premature to fund this program until other construction and related program
grants can be evaluated.

Item 7980-001-0001—For support of Student Aid Commission. I reduce this item from
$15,449,000 to $15,349,000 by reducing:
(1) 15-Financial Aid Grants Program from $13,886,000 to $13,786,000,
and by deleting Provision 5.

I am deleting the $100,000 legislative augmentation for one position for purposes of
administering the Public Interest Attorney Loan Repayment Program to conform to my
action on Item 7980-101-0001.

I am deleting Provision 5 to conform to this action.
Item 7980-101-0001—For local assistance, Student Aid Commission. I reduce this item
from $859,814,000 to $857,614,000 by reducing:
(1) 15-Financial Aid Grants Program from $889,950,000 to $887,750,000,
and by revising Provision 5 and deleting Provision 9.

I am reducing the legislative augmentation for the California Student Opportunity and
Access Program (CalSOAP) by $2,200,000. This program provides financial aid awareness
as well as student academic preparation and education services to public school students.
This reduction is necessary in order to build a prudent reserve in light of the various uncertainties
in revenues and spending that we face this year. Additionally, I am concerned
that this program’s various student academic support and preparation activities have not
been subjected to a cost-effectiveness analysis in many years. With this reduction,
$6,367,000 still remains for CalSOAP to support financial aid awareness activities. Further,
it is my understanding that the California Student Aid Commission recently approved
$2,200,000 from the Student Loan Operating Fund for similar financial aid outreach purposes.
Therefore, this augmentation is largely redundant with planned expenditures.

I am revising Provision 5 to conform to this action:
“5. Of the funds appropriated in Schedule (1), $8,567,000 $6,367,000 is for the California
Student Opportunity and Access Program established pursuant to Article 4 (commencing
with Section 69560) of Chapter 2 of Part 42 of the Education Code and shall be available
to provide financial aid awareness and outreach to students who are preparing to enter,
or are currently enrolled in, college.”
Additionally, I am deleting the legislative language augmentation included in Provision
9 that authorizes 100 new warrants for the Public Interest Attorney Loan Repayment
Program. The authorization of 100 loan assumption warrants would commit the state to
out-year costs in excess of $1,000,000. Furthermore, this program authorizes warrants for
attorneys employed by local government. Thus, in effect, this augmentation would serve
to subsidize local government employee recruitment and retention with state funds.
Therefore, this action is necessary to limit program expansions.

Item 7100-001-0185—For support of Employment Development Department. I reduce
this item from $79,495,000 to $67,435,000.

I am reducing the $27,060,000 legislative augmentation for the Job Services Program
by $12,060,000. This program provides employment services in the One-Stop Career
Centers, facilitating a match between employers’ needs and job seekers’ skills, and while
I agree with the Legislature that some additional resources would benefit job seekers, I
am confident that the $168,000,000 available will be sufficient in meeting the employment
demands of California communities. Finally, I am directing the Employment Development
Department to minimize the number of positions to be reduced in job services locations
by making reductions in Administration and facility operations.
I am deleting Provision 4 to conform to this action.

Item 7350-001-0001—For support of Department of Industrial Relations. I reduce this
item from $67,768,000 to $67,383,000 by reducing:
(6) 50-Division of Labor Standards Enforcement from $49,933,000 to $49,548,000.

I am deleting $385,000 and 5.0 positions for the Licensing and Registration Unit provided
for recently enacted legislation including the registration of employers in the car
washing and polishing industry. This reduction is necessary to further build a prudent reserve
in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year.

Item 7350-011-0223—For support of Department of Industrial Relations. I revise this
item by deleting Provision 1.

I delete Provision 1, which would require the Department of Industrial Relations to
provide a long-term plan and a detailed repayment schedule by January 10, 2008, for the
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Targeted Inspection and
Consultation Fund loan.
This reporting requirement would result in an expenditure increase without regard to
the availability of revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing this language. Nevertheless, in
recognition of the Legislature’s desire to obtain this information, it will be addressed as
though the request had been included in Supplemental Report language. Therefore, I am
instructing the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations to comply with this
legislative request for this report to the extent compliance can be achieved using existing
resources and without impairing the Department of Industrial Relations’ ability to perform
its essential functions.

Item 8120-011-0268—For support of Commission on Peace Officer Standards and
Training. I revise this item by deleting Provision 3.

I am deleting Provision 3, which would require the Commission on Peace Officer
Standards and Training to report to the Legislature on the findings of the local law enforcement
agency audits conducted by the Controller on behalf of the commission. This reporting
requirement would result in an expenditure increase without regard to the availability of
revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing this language. Nevertheless, in recognition of the
Legislature’s desire to obtain this information, it will be addressed as though the request
had been included in Supplemental Report language. Therefore, I am instructing the Executive
Director of the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to comply
with this legislative request for this report to the extent compliance can be achieved using
existing resources and without impairing the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and
Training’s ability to perform its essential functions.

Item 8660-001-0042—For support of Public Utilities Commission. I reduce this item
from $3,526,000 to $3,354,000.

I am deleting a legislative augmentation of $172,000 and 2.0 positions for Public Utilities
Commission’s (PUC) rail crossing safety staff. In the 2006 Budget Act, I included three
positions for the rail safety crossing program, giving the PUC 20.0 base positions for rail
crossing safety. To date, all those positions are not filled. It would be premature to authorize
additional positions until the positions at the PUC are filled and the impact on workload
can be determined. With these reductions, $3,354,000 still remains to support the rail
crossing safety staff.

Item 8660-001-0462—For support of Public Utilities Commission. I revise this item
by reducing:
(1) 10-Regulation of Utilities from $120,157,000 to $119,857,000;
(3) 20-Regulation of Transportation from $19,911,000 to $19,739,000;
(7) Amount payable from the State Highway Account, State Transportation Fund (Item
8660-001-0042) from -$3,526,000 to -$3,354,000; and
(18) Amount payable from the Public Utilities Commission Rate payer Advocate Account

(Item 8660-001-3089) from -$21,632,000 to -$21,332,000.
I am revising this item to conform to the actions I have taken in Item 8660-001-3089
and Item 8660-001-0042.

Item 8660-001-3089—For support of Public Utilities Commission. I reduce this item
from $21,632,000 to $21,332,000.

I am deleting a legislative augmentation of $300,000 and 3 positions for the Division
of Ratepayer Advocates’ (DRA) water audits division. The Budget Act of 2006 provided
additional auditors to the Public Utilities Commission (Commission) that were intended
to meet the needs of the DRA as well as the balance of the Commission. With these reductions,
$2,200,000 and 22.0 positions still remain to support the Division of Ratepayer
Advocates water auditing staff.

Item 8770-001-0462—For Support of the Electricity Oversight Board. I reduce this
item from $3,579,000 to $2,684,000 by reducing:
(1) 30-Administration from $4,128,000 to $3,096,000, and
(2) Amount payable from the Energy Resources Programs Account
(Item 8770-001-0465) from -$549,000 to -$412,000.

I am reducing Schedule (1) to reflect my expectation that by April 1, 2008, the Electricity
Oversight Board (EOB) will have transferred its remaining duties to the Public Utilities
Commission. The EOB was established in 1996 as part of the state’s attempt to restructure
the electricity industry, and was given the responsibility for overseeing the California Independent
System Operator, a non-profit entity that operates most of California’s electric
transmission grid. Since that time, changes in state and federal law have eliminated the
need for the EOB; the duties it performs are now also performed either by the California
Independent System Operator or the California Public Utilities Commission. When I first
took office, the California Performance Review determined that the EOB should be
eliminated, with its remaining functions transferred to other entities. It is time to implement
this recommendation. With this reduction, sufficient funding will remain in the EOB
budget to allow for an orderly staffing reduction plan so staff will have every opportunity
to transfer to new duties within California state government. I am requesting the Department
of Personnel Administration to fully assist the EOB in this effort.

Item 8770-001-0465—For support of the Electricity Oversight Board. I reduce this item
from $549,000 to $412,000.

I am revising this item to conform to actions I have taken in Item 8770-001-0462.

Item 8910-001-0001—For support of Office of Administrative Law. I revise this item
by deleting Provision 1.

I am deleting Provision 1, which would require the Office of Administrative Law to
report to the Legislature on the use of positions assigned to underground regulation review.
This reporting requirement would result in an expenditure increase without regard to the
availability of revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing this language. Nevertheless, in
recognition of the Legislature’s desire to obtain this information, it will be addressed as
though the request had been included in Supplemental Report language. Therefore, I am
instructing the director of the Office of Administrative Law to comply with this legislative
request for this report to the extent compliance can be achieved using existing resources
and without impairing the Office of Administrative Law’s ability to perform its essential
functions.

Item 8955-001-0001—For support of California Department of Veterans Affairs. I revise
this item by deleting Provision 5.

I delete Provision 5, which would require the California Department of Veterans Affairs
(CDVA) to report on the Department’s progress in providing a “restraint-free” environment
for residents at the Veterans Homes. This reporting requirement would result in an expenditure
increase without regard to the availability of revenues. Consequently, I am vetoing
this language. Nevertheless, in recognition of the Legislature’s desire to obtain this information,
it will be addressed as though the request had been included in Supplemental
Report language. Therefore, I am instructing the Secretary of the CDVA to comply with
this legislative request for this report to the extent compliance can be achieved using existing
resources and without impairing the CDVA’s ability to perform its essential functions.

Item 9210-107-0001—For local assistance, Local Government Financing. I delete this
item.

I am deleting the $3,500,000 legislative augmentation for grants to county assessors,
which would be made in proportion to the amount of property tax received by their K-14
schools. This reduction is necessary to limit program expansions and provide for a prudent
General Fund reserve in light of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that
we face this year.
Local government is anticipated to receive $28,000,000 in property tax revenue in 2007-
08 pursuant to a new method of collecting fractionally owned aircraft property taxes, facilitated
by budget trailer bill legislation. As a result, this $3,500,000 augmentation is
unnecessary.

Item 9800-001-0001—For Augmentation for Employee Compensation. I reduce this
item from $525,262,000 to $453,262,000.

I am reducing funding by $72,000,000 for employee compensation and instructing my
administration to absorb this reduction in order to further build a prudent reserve in light
of the various uncertainties in revenues and spending that we face this year. To effect this
reduction, I am directing the Director of Finance to reduce the amount that would have
been allocated to each department from Item 9800-001-0001 by an amount equal to 8.576
percent of that department’s General Fund expenditures for personal services in April of
2007. With this reduction, $453,262,000 still remains to be allocated by the Department
of Finance for increases in employee compensation that the Department of Personnel
Administration has already agreed to pay. This reduced amount available for allocation
to departments will not affect pay or benefits for employees in any way. Employees will
receive full pay, and the funding for pay increases not available from Item 9800 will be
funded by a redirection within existing resources by individual departments. So, all previously
negotiated employee compensation increases, and all employee compensation increases
for medical, mental, and dental health positions arising from the Coleman and
Plata court cases will be unaffected by my action to reduce this appropriation.
Item SEC 24.55—California Research and Education Network. I delete this control
section.

I am deleting Control Section 24.55 because this language is unnecessary and could
increase administrative costs at the expense of either direct network services or potentially
higher fees. Chapter 552, Statutes of 2006, already provides appropriate oversight for K-
12. Similarly, annual program review through the budget process, the governance structure
of the higher education segments, and the current business practices of establishing interagency
agreements and essentially using cost-based accounting for each educational segment
already provide appropriate accountability for higher education.

With the above deletions, revisions, and reductions, I hereby approve Senate Bill 77.




Schwarzenegger, Arnold