BILL ANALYSIS SB 353 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 27, 2007 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mark Leno, Chair SB 353 (Kuehl) - As Amended: June 7, 2007 Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill allows a court to protect an animal in a domestic violence protective order. Specifically, this bill: 1)Allows a court, upon a showing of good cause, to include in a domestic violence protective order a grant of exclusive control of any animal kept by a petitioner, respondent, or minor child residing in the residence, and allows the court to order the respondent to stay away from the animal. 2)Requires the Judicial Council to conform applicable criminal and civil court forms to the above by July 1, 2009. FISCAL EFFECT Minor absorbable costs for the Judicial Council to modify forms. COMMENTS Purpose . To prevent continued abuse to victims of domestic violence, current law allows victims to seek a restraining order on the abuser. An order, granted by a court, may be of varying duration depending on the circumstances. Restraining orders generally cover the victim, but may be extended to named family or household members, upon a showing of good cause. This bill seeks to also protect animals by allowing a court to include them within a domestic violence protective order. According to the author, "University studies, coupled with surveys of domestic violence shelters and animal welfare SB 353 Page 2 organizations, show that abusers often threaten, injure or kill pets as a way of controlling others in the family. Studies from across the country have found an irrefutable link between domestic violence, child abuse and animal cruelty. . . " Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081