BILL ANALYSIS
SB 353
Page 1
Date of Hearing: June 27, 2007
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mark Leno, Chair
SB 353 (Kuehl) - As Amended: June 7, 2007
Policy Committee:
JudiciaryVote:10-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill allows a court to protect an animal in a domestic
violence protective order. Specifically, this bill:
1)Allows a court, upon a showing of good cause, to include in a
domestic violence protective order a grant of exclusive
control of any animal kept by a petitioner, respondent, or
minor child residing in the residence, and allows the court to
order the respondent to stay away from the animal.
2)Requires the Judicial Council to conform applicable criminal
and civil court forms to the above by July 1, 2009.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs for the Judicial Council to modify forms.
COMMENTS
Purpose . To prevent continued abuse to victims of domestic
violence, current law allows victims to seek a restraining
order on the abuser. An order, granted by a court, may be
of varying duration depending on the circumstances.
Restraining orders generally cover the victim, but may be
extended to named family or household members, upon a
showing of good cause. This bill seeks to also protect
animals by allowing a court to include them within a
domestic violence protective order.
According to the author, "University studies, coupled with
surveys of domestic violence shelters and animal welfare
SB 353
Page 2
organizations, show that abusers often threaten, injure or
kill pets as a way of controlling others in the family.
Studies from across the country have found an irrefutable
link between domestic violence, child abuse and animal
cruelty. . . "
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081