BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                SB 966
                                                                       

                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                        Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
                              2007-2008 Regular Session
                                           
           BILL NO:    SB 966
           AUTHOR:     Simitian/ Kuehl
           AMENDED:    As Introduced
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:     March 26, 2007
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Rachel Machi
            
           SUBJECT  :    PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DISPOSAL

            SUMMARY  :    
           
            Existing law  :

           1) Under the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic  
             Act the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is authorized to  
             oversee the safety of food, drugs, and cosmetics. 

           2)Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of  
             1976, the management of solid and hazardous wastes is  
             regulated.

           3) Under the California Hazardous Substances Act, the  
             Department of Toxic Substances Control is authorized to  
             regulate hazardous materials and wastes to ensure that the  
             state is delegated authority in accordance with RCRA.

           4) Under the California Integrated Waste Management Act, the  
             California Integrated Waste Management Board implements a  
             statewide household hazardous substance information and  
             collection program.

           5) Under the Medical Waste Management Act the State Department  
             of Health Services regulates the management and handling of  
             medical waste.  Certain items, such as household waste, are  
             specifically excluded from the definition of medical waste.

            This bill  requires every retailer of pharmaceutical drugs on  
           and after July 1, 2008, to have in place a system for the  
           acceptance and collection of pharmaceutical drugs for proper  
           disposal that includes specified elements.  Any person who  









                                                                SB 966
                                                                 Page 2

           violates those provisions shall, if convicted, be guilty of a  
           misdemeanor, and subject to specified civil and criminal  
           penalties. 

            COMMENTS  :

            1)Purpose of bill  .  The United States Geological Survey  
             conducted a study in 2002 sampling 139 streams across 30  
             states and found that 80 percent had measurable  
             concentrations of prescription and nonprescription drugs,  
             steroids, and reproductive hormones.  Exposure, even to low  
             levels of pharmaceuticals, has been shown to have negative  
             effects on fish and other aquatic species and may have  
             negative effects on human health.

             Without a safe and effective method for disposal,  
             prescription drugs may be left indefinitely in medicine  
             cabinets where they pose a threat of potential prescription  
             drug misuse or abuse.  

             According to the author, SB 966 provides a safe and  
             environmentally sound method for the disposal of unused  
             prescription drugs.  Currently, when an individual needs to  
             dispose of expired or left over medications, the only safe  
             way to do so is to take it to a household hazardous waste  
             collection site.  Most often drugs are either flushed down  
             the toilet or thrown in the garbage where they can pose a  
             threat to the environment and contaminate our waterways.

           2)  Response to Bush Administration recommendations  .  In an  
             attempt to address the potential health and environmental  
             risks associated with prescription drug disposal, in  
             February, the White House Office of National Drug Control  
             Policy, the Health and Human Services Agency, and the  
             Environmental Protection Agency released new Federal  
             prescription drug disposal guidelines urging Americans to  
             utilize pharmaceutical take-back locations.  However, there  
             are few of these programs in existence.

            3)Other state programs  .  The State of Washington is currently  
             implementing a pharmacy-based take-back program pilot  
             project.  Maine has adopted legislation to implement a  
             mail-back program to the Maine Drug Enforcement Agency.  









                                                                SB 966
                                                                 Page 3


             Several other states have introduced legislation to address  
           this issue.

            4)British Columbia program  .  The Medications Return Program  
             has been operated in British Columbia since 1996.  It is  
             administrated by the Residuals Management Group Ltd., an  
             industry association.  It is funded by a fee on  
             pharmaceutical manufacturers.  Pharmacies participate  
             voluntarily at a rate of 90%.  In 2004, 52,800 pounds of  
             drugs were collected.

            5)Take-back events  .  In 2006, a coalition of 23 state and  
             local agencies, as well as local organizations participated  
             in 38 regional collection events in the San Francisco Bay  
             area.  They collected 3,685 pounds of drugs from 1500  
             residents.

            6)Amendments needed  .  The Board of Pharmacy does not currently  
             have a position on the bill but has provided technical  
             advice on the definition of "pharmaceutical drug,"  
             recommending that the definition be changed to reflect the  
             definition of drug in the Business and Profession Code  
             Section 4025.  Under that provision:
                 ""Drug" means any of the following:
                        (a) Articles recognized in the official United  
                        States Pharmacopoeia, official National Formulary  
                        or official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the  
                        United States, or any supplement of any of them.
                        (b) Articles intended for use in the diagnosis,  
           cure, mitigation, 
                        treatment, or prevention of disease in humans or  
           other animals.
                        (c) Articles (other than food) intended to affect  
                        the structure or any function of the body of  
                        humans or other animals.
                        (d) Articles intended for use as a component of  
                        any article specified in subdivision (a), (b), or  
                        (c)."

             Federal law prohibits anyone other than law enforcement from  
             taking possession of drugs once they are prescribed and  
             dispensed.  Therefore controlled substances should be exempt  









                                                                SB 966
                                                                 Page 4

             from the provisions of this bill.

             A criminal penalty was inadvertently added.  An amendment is  
             needed to remove that provision to this bill and should be  
             stricken.

             The California Veterinary Medical Association has a "support  
             if amended" position and has requested an amendment to  
             clarify that veterinarians would only be responsible for  
             having to dispose of the drugs that they personally sold and  
             not the human drugs that a client would have purchased at  
             another retail establishment.

              Related legislation  .  SB 1305 (Figueroa) Chapter 64,  
             Statutes of 2006, prohibits a person from knowingly placing  
             home-generated sharps waste in the commercial and  
             residential solid waste collection containers after  
             September 1, 2008.   

            7)Arguments in support  .  Californians Against Waste (CAW)  
             state that there are currently few safe and convenient ways  
             for consumers to dispose of unused prescription drugs.  A  
             2006 study showed that only 5% of pharmacies had a  
             consistent message to patients on the safe disposal of  
             pharmaceuticals.  Nearly all unused pharmaceuticals enter  
             either our solid waste system or our sewage system.  Neither  
             disposal methods are environmentally sound.  According to  
             CAW, pharmaceuticals flushed down the toilet pass through  
             our sewage treatment plants - which are generally not  
             designed to screen for these chemicals.  Pharmaceuticals  
             discarded in landfills can seep into the surrounding  
             watertable.
              
              Supporters argue that the take back provisions of SB 966  
             will provide consumers with a safe and convenient system for  
             the environmentally sound management of unused prescription  
             drugs.  Supporters believe that pharmacies represent a  
             logical and convenient collection point for consumers and  
             pharmacies are in a strong position to negotiate with  
             pharmaceutical manufacturers for a 'shared responsibility'  
             for any costs associated with the proper management of  
             pharmaceuticals.










                                                                SB 966
                                                                 Page 5

            8)Arguments in opposition  .  Opponents argue that pharmacies  
             will incur substantial costs by participating in a mandated  
             drug disposal program, and in addition to labor costs  
             associated with such a program, there will be notification  
             and outreach costs.
              
              According to the opposition, other states that have  
             established drug disposal programs have made them voluntary  
             and have allowed pharmacies to charge a nominal fee to cover  
             the cost associated with the program.  In addition, some  
             states have established voluntary take back days in which  
             drugs from each store and properly dispose of them.

            SOURCE  :        Abe Binder, Santa Clara resident and Rebecca  
                          Kassel, Santa Cruz resident
            
           SUPPORT  :       American Federation of State, County and  
           Municipal                                                    
           Employees, Breast Cancer Fund, Californians Against          
           Waste, California Association of Sanitation Agencies,  
           California Product Stewardship Council, California           
           Veterinary Medical Association (support if amended),         
           Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, City of Benicia, City  
           of Palo Alto, City and County of San Francisco, Clean Water  
           Action, EXP Pharmaceutical Services Corp., Maine             
           Benzodiazepine Study Group, Maine Unused Drug Disposal Group,  
           Mt. View Sanitary District, Orange County Sanitation    
           District, San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, Sierra  
           Club California

            OPPOSITION  :                                             
           California Grocers Association, California Retailers         
           Association, Rite Aid