BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1221| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 1221 Author: Kuehl (D) Amended: 8/18/08 Vote: 21 SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE : 6-2, 4/23/08 AYES: Kuehl, Alquist, Cedillo, Negrete McLeod, Steinberg, Yee NOES: Aanestad, Cox NO VOTE RECORDED: Maldonado, Ridley-Thomas, Wyland SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 SENATE FLOOR : 25-13, 5/27/08 AYES: Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, Correa, Ducheny, Florez, Kehoe, Kuehl, Lowenthal, Machado, Maldonado, Migden, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Perata, Romero, Scott, Simitian, Steinberg, Torlakson, Vincent, Wiggins, Yee NOES: Aanestad, Ackerman, Ashburn, Cogdill, Cox, Denham, Dutton, Harman, Hollingsworth, Margett, McClintock, Runner, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Battin, Ridley-Thomas ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 47-32, 8/20/08 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Health facility financing SOURCE : California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer CONTINUED SB 1221 Page 2 DIGEST : This bill requires health facilities seeking financing from the California Health Facilities Financing Authority (CHFFA), a local government, or a joint powers authority (JPA), to demonstrate to the satisfaction of CHFFA, the local government, or the JPA, the performance of community service, as specified. Assembly Amendments revised existing legislative intent to state that the Legislature intends for the CHFFA to assist in providing tax-exempt financing based on the creditworthiness of the obligors regarding financing, revises existing legislative intent language to state that the Legislature intends for savings passed on for the benefit of the public is in the form of community services as provided in the bill, required participating health institutions to demonstrate specified actions, and required participating health institutions that are not non-hospital affiliates or hospitals subject to the community benefit requirement to demonstrate to CHFFA the performance of community service by other means, including, but not limited to, certifying that it is a primary care clinic, Indian health clinic, or clinic operated by a primary care community or free clinic that is open for no more than 20 hours a week. ANALYSIS : Existing Law 1. Permits CHFFA to make secured or unsecured loans to, or purchase secured or unsecured loans of, a public or non-profit health institution in connection with the financing of a project or of working capital. 2. Specifies that, for the purposes of CHFFA's loans, a non-profit health institution includes, but is not limited to, a general acute care hospital; an acute psychiatric hospital; a skilled nursing facility (SNF); an intermediate care facility; a special health care facility that provides medical, nursing, rehabilitation, dental, or maternity services; a clinic; an adult day health center; a county-operated health facility; a residential facility for the elderly that is operated as a part of, or in conjunction with, an intermediate care SB 1221 Page 3 facility, a SNF, or a general acute care hospital; a child day care facility operated in conjunction with a health facility; an intermediate care facility/developmentally disabled habilitative, that is a health facility; a community care facility; an accredited community work-activity program; a community mental health center; and a speech and hearing center, or a blood bank. 3. States legislative intent that CHFFA provide financing to health facilities that can demonstrate the financial feasibility of their projects, with specified exceptions. 4. States legislative intent that all or part of any savings realized by a health institution as a result of that tax-exempt revenue bond funding, be passed on to the consuming public either through lower charges or through containment of the rate of increase in hospital rates. 5. Requires hospitals to maintain an understandable written policy regarding discounted payments and charity care to financially qualified patients, as specified. 6. Requires non-profit hospitals to annually adopt and update a community benefits plan for providing community benefits, as specified, and to submit the plan to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. This bill: 1.Requires a participating health institution seeking financing for a project from CHFFA, a local government entity or JPA to demonstrate, for each project location, the performance of community service, by submitting all of the following: A. A copy of its policy of treating all patients without regard to ability to pay, in accordance with existing law. If the applicant is not subject to that provision of law, they must submit a copy of its policy for providing emergency services without regard to a patient's ability to pay. SB 1221 Page 4 B. Confirmation that the applicant maintains a California Medical Assistance Commission contract, otherwise provides for the treatment of Medi-Cal eligible patients, or otherwise provides services to low-income individuals. C. A copy of its charity care policy required pursuant to existing law. D. Confirmation that it maintains a mechanism for tracking and reporting its costs, charges, and clinical quality data, to the extent required by state and federal agencies. E. A copy of the most recent community benefits plan, as defined in existing law, including an implementation schedule and economic valuation of the community benefits. 2.Exempts from the community service requirement a health facility that operates as a children's hospital. 3.Requires a hospital that does not submit the information described in # 1 above to demonstrate the performance of community service by submitting is most recent community benefits plan, to identify its priorities, as determined by the community needs assessment, and demonstrate that it has taken action on most of these priorities. 4.Requires a non-hospital affiliate of a participating health institution to demonstrate the performance of community service by submitting any item of information described in # 1 above, or by other means, as described in # 5 below. 5.Requires a participating health institution that is neither a hospital subject to the community benefits requirements or a non-hospital affiliate, and does not submit any of the items of information described in # 3 above, to demonstrate the performance of community service by other means, including, but not limited to, providing a certification that the participating health institution is a federally qualified health center, a SB 1221 Page 5 primary care clinic, free clinic, or a clinic that is open for no more than 20 hours a week. 6.Prohibits this bill or any enforcement proceeding brought under this bill or the CHFFA statute from affecting the validity or enforceability of any bonds issued by CHFFA, a JPA, or local government under this bill. 7.Requires the remedies and sanctions available to the local government or JPA against a borrower for failure to adhere to the assurance given under this bill to include referring the violation to the office of the Attorney General for legal action authorized under existing law or other remedy at law or equity. 8.Repeals the existing authority of CHFFA to give special consideration on a case-by-case basis to financing health facility projects that do not meet CHFFA bond rating guidelines. 9.Modifies existing CHFFA legislative intent language stating that all or part of any savings experienced by CHFFA participating health institutions as a result of tax-exempt financing (instead of tax-exempt revenue bond financing in current law) be passed on to the consuming public by deleting the language that the pass-through be through lower charges or containment of the rate of increase in hospital rates, and instead states legislative intent that the pass-through be passed through for the benefit of the public in the form of community service as provided in this bill. 10.Revise existing legislative intent to state the Legislature intends for CHFFA to assist in providing tax exempt financing based on the creditworthiness of the obligors with request to the requested financing, instead of only assisting health facilities that can demonstrate the financial feasibility of their projects. 11.Applies the legislative intent language (as modified by this bill) to local financing of health facilities by JPAs and local governments. SB 1221 Page 6 Background In January of 2008, the Senate Office of Research (SOR) released a report comparing procedures used by authorities issuing state bonds to procedures used by authorities issuing bonds under non-state JPAs. Both types of entities provide tax-exempt bonds for schools, hospitals, affordable housing, and pollution control facilities. The SOR analysis highlighted several conditions placed on state bond issuing authorities, such as the CHFFA, that are not placed on JPAs. CHFFA commissioned an analysis, released in March 2008, to evaluate the impact of its pass-through public benefit savings requirement. The report notes that, when it was created in 1979, CHFFA was the primary organization providing non-profit health facilities with access to the tax-exempt bond market. Through CHFFA, non-profit hospitals were able to obtain lower interest rates than they would by using traditional taxable vehicle bonds. Recognizing the benefit derived by obtaining CHFFA's tax-exempt financing, the Legislature expressed its intent that "all or part of" the resulting savings be "passed on to the consuming public through lower charges or containment of the rate of increase in hospital rates." In the ensuing 25 years, several JPAs in California began offering non-profit health facilities access to the tax-exempt bond market. However, these JPAs are not subject to the legislative intent language in current law to pass-on "all or part" of the savings generated from financing through CHFFA. The Sjoberg-Evashenk report states that the pass-through requirement has created a chilling effect on CHFFA's tax exempt bond financing activity. In the 11 months since the Sutter Health transaction, CHFFA has only provided $27 million of tax-exempt bond financing, in stark contrast to the $1.1 billion per year it had averaged since 2002. In a more striking contrast, as bond issuance continued on a declining trend for CHFFA, the volume generated by its primary competitor rose to $2.2 billion in 2007. Sjoberg-Evashenk conducted interviews with hospitals, health care associations, underwriters, bond counsel, and SB 1221 Page 7 key stakeholders as part of their study. Through those interviews, it was made clear that hospitals and other health care providers will not return to CHFFA for tax-exempt bond financing unless CHFFA clearly defines the pass-through provision. The report went on to recommend that a legislative solution, that does not place CHFFA at a competitive disadvantage with alternative issuers, be crafted. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 8/20/08) California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer (source) ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : Treasurer Bill Lockyer writes that there have been many changes over the last 29 years since the statutes that created CHFFA were drafted and that the current legislative intent language was crafted before the advent of managed care, capitated rates, and JPA issuance of tax-exempt financing. The Treasurer further states that there is no single agreed-upon methodology or convention for calculating savings, particularly in the context of recent market fluctuations, and that hospitals have significantly changed their business practices since 1979, providing varied and valuable community benefits, which are funded wholly or in part by the savings which inure them from tax-exempt financing. The Treasurer contends that the vague and discretionary intent language currently in statute, unique to CHFFA, raises expectations on the part of consumers and advocates who harbor an unwarranted hope that health care costs can, and should, be controlled by conduit issuers, who otherwise have no statutory or regulatory role to develop or apply policy in this area. Conversely, the language unnecessarily repels potential borrowers from doing business with the only state-run conduit issuer of tax-exempt status, so much so that CHFFA's borrower base has taken their business to other conduit issuers who are not required to operate under this vague intent language. Borrowers fear that this broad language allows the SB 1221 Page 8 authority to impose costly conditions on their transactions that are not required elsewhere. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : AYES: Arambula, Beall, Berg, Blakeslee, Brownley, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeSaulnier, Dymally, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hancock, Hayashi, Hernandez, Huffman, Jones, Karnette, Krekorian, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Lieu, Ma, Mendoza, Mullin, Nava, Nunez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Solorio, Swanson, Torrico, Wolk, Bass NOES: Adams, Aghazarian, Anderson, Benoit, Berryhill, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fuller, Gaines, Garcia, Garrick, Horton, Houston, Huff, Jeffries, Keene, La Malfa, Maze, Nakanishi, Niello, Parra, Plescia, Sharon Runner, Silva, Smyth, Spitzer, Strickland, Tran, Villines, Walters NO VOTE RECORDED: Soto CTW:do 8/23/08 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****