BILL NUMBER: SB 1350	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  JUNE 17, 2008

INTRODUCED BY   Senator  Ashburn   Cedillo 

    (   Principal coauthor:   Assembly Member
  Eng   ) 

                        FEBRUARY 20, 2008

    An act to amend Section 22353 of the Vehicle Code,
relating to speed limits.   An act to add Article 6.95
(commencing with Section 20209.50) to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division
2 of the Public Contract Code, relating to public contracts. 


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   SB 1350, as amended,  Ashburn   Cedillo 
.  Speed limits: Bear Valley Community Services District:
equestrian safety.   Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority: facilities: design-build project:
public-private partnership.  
   Existing law makes the Department of Transportation responsible
for improving and maintaining the state highway system. Existing law
authorizes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority, until January 1, 2010, in consultation with the Department
of Transportation, to use a specified design-build procurement
process for the construction of a high-occupancy vehicle lane in Los
Angeles County designated in the National Corridor Infrastructure
Improvement Program as established by federal law. Existing law also
authorizes the Department of Transportation and regional
transportation agencies, until January 1, 2012, to enter into
comprehensive development lease agreements with public or private
entities for a limited number of transportation projects that may
charge users of those projects tolls and user fees.  
   This bill would require the Department of Transportation to be
responsible for the preparation of reports and documents with
sufficient detail so that adequate information will be available to
prepare proposals for providing services and financing to complete
the design, construction, and operation of a tunnel closing the gap
between Interstate 710 and Interstate 210 in Los Angeles County. This
bill would authorize the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, in consultation with the Department of
Transportation, upon specified conditions, to determine whether the
tunnel project should be developed as a design-build project, as
specified, or under the condition of a project development agreement
between the authority and a private entity that provides for the
lease of the tunnel project to the private entity, as specified. This
bill would provide for the collection of tolls and related fees and
would allow the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority to issue debt secured by the tolls and fees. The bill also
would provide for the formation of a project construction advisory
authority to provide oversight of the construction and operation of
the project.  
   Existing law prohibits a person from driving a vehicle at a speed
greater than the speed limit. Existing law sets forth prima facie
speed limits unless changed or otherwise authorized by law and
permits local authorities to set prima facie speed limits higher or
lower than the established prima facie speed limits on the basis of
an engineering and traffic survey, as defined, if the different speed
limit is necessary to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and
is reasonable and safe. Existing law requires an engineering and
traffic survey to include consideration of prevailing speeds as
determined by traffic engineering measurements, accident records, and
highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to
drivers and authorizes local authorities to consider other specified
factors, including pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 

   Existing law authorizes the City of Norco to consider equestrian
safety, in addition to those factors, when conducting an engineering
and traffic survey.  
   This bill would authorize the Bear Valley Community Services
District to consider equestrian safety in addition to the other
factors.  
   The bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to
the necessity of a special statute. 
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee:  no
  yes  . State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    Article 6.95 (commencing with Section
20209.50) is added to Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 2 of the 
 Public Contract Code   , to read:  

      Article 6.95.  Los Angeles County Innovative Transportation
Project


   20209.50.  The Legislature finds and declares:
   (a) For over 40 years, several attempts have been made to complete
the 4.5 mile gap between temporary terminus of Interstate 710
freeway at Valley Boulevard in Alhambra and the connector at Del Mar
in Pasadena to Interstate 210.
   (b) The several surface alignments through the Cities of Alhambra,
South Pasadena, and Pasadena, and the El Sereno district of the City
of Los Angeles within the corridor have been proposed to close the
gap, but none have been acceptable to every community.
   (c) The inability to complete the highway has diminished the
quality of life to all citizens in the region by reducing air
quality, increasing commute times, and contributing to the growing
traffic congestion in the region.
   (d) The circuitous and indirect travel patterns along city
traversing neighborhoods and local business districts that result
from the lack of a direct, unimpeded connection between Interstate
710 and Interstate 210 would be converted to direct trips resulting
in the reduction of vehicle miles traveled and an increase in the
average speed of the trips. Both outcomes would contribute to a
reduction of greenhouse gases and a reduction in criteria pollutants
(including ozone, oxides of nitrogen, and carbon monoxide),
respectively, if the gap between Interstate 710 and Interstate 210
was closed.
   (e) The Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway
Administration, the Southern California Association of Governments,
and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority have
supported the completion of Route 710 to relieve regional and local
traffic congestion and to enhance regional air quality.
   (f) The Southern California Association of Governments, the
regional transportation planning agency under state law, as well as
the metropolitan planning organization designated by the federal
government for southern California, has included this project in its
Regional Transportation Plan since 1989 and in its Regional
Transportation Improvement Plan, the region's capital investment
program for transportation, since 1991.
   (g) The Southern California Association of Governments proposed
that a tunnel may be a feasible way of closing the gap between
Interstate 710 and Interstate 210, as a tunnel would remove the need
for a right-of-way, and the demolition of homes, historic structures,
businesses, and other public and private buildings, while
contributing to the improvement of air quality in the southern
California region and enhancing regional mobility.
   (h) The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
in conjunction with the Department of Transportation, commissioned a
study to determine whether a tunnel solution would be feasible and
worthy of further consideration as an investment strategy for closing
the gap between Interstate 710 and Interstate 210.
   (i) The study commissioned by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority concluded that the tunnel concept to close
the gap between Interstate 710 and Interstate 210 is technically
feasible, and that there are no identified insurmountable issues that
would preclude further analysis of the tunnel concept.
   (j) The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
included the gap closure project between Interstate 710 and
Interstate 210 in its 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan's Strategic
Plan, rather than in its funded baseline and constrained plan, due
to a lack of local consensus and financial constraints.
   (k) The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
is currently updating its 25-year Long Range Transportation Plan for
adoption in June 2008, and the proposal for constructing a tunnel to
close the gap between Interstate 710 and Interstate 210 is among the
major projects being considered for inclusion in the plan.
   20209.51.  For purposes of this article:
   (a) "Authority" means the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
   (b) "Best value" means a value determined by objective criteria
and may include, but is not limited to, price, features, functions,
life-cycle costs, and other criteria deemed appropriate by the
authority in consultation with the department.
   (c) "Contracting agency" means the authority.
   (d) "Department" means the Department of Transportation.
   (e) "Design-build" means a procurement process in which both the
design and construction of a project are procured from a single
entity.
   (f) "Design-build entity" means a partnership, corporation, or
other legal entity that is able to provide appropriately licensed
contracting, architectural, and engineering services as needed
pursuant to a design-build contract.
   (g) "Facility" means the tunnel constructed by the project.
   (h) "Project" means the construction of a tunnel closing the gap
between Interstate 710 and Interstate 210 in Los Angeles County,
provided a record of decision has been issued by the United States
Department of Transportation.
   20209.52.  (a) (1) The department shall be responsible for the
preparation of project study reports and other project justification
and needs reports, the preparation of environmental documents
including through and including the issuance of a record of decision
by the Federal Highway Administration, and the preparation of the
project's scoping documents including project alignment, design
documents, and performance criteria with sufficient detail so that
private consortia, whether responding to a design-build procurement
or a project development agreement solicitation, will have adequate
information to prepare proposals for providing the services and
financing necessary to complete the design, construction, and
operation of the project.
   (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of
this project, the department is authorized to retain outside
engineering firms, planning firms, traffic forecasting firms,
economic and financial consulting firms, and individuals with
expertise in the financing, design, construction, and operation of
tunnels, for purposes of assisting with the preparation of the
environmental documents and other predevelopment activities, and to
assist the department's professional engineering staff in the
preparation of necessary documents that are required to bring the
project to the level of design that will allow private firms to bid
on the project pursuant to Sections 20209.53 and 20209.54.
   (3) Firms or individuals retained by the authority or the
department, either individually or jointly, to assist with the
preparation of plans, preliminary engineering, environmental
documents, financial analyses, and other related activities shall not
be eligible to participate in the competition with a design-build
entity or with a private entity submitting a project development
agreement proposal.
   (4) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, specialized
inspection and surveying services may be retained by the department
due to the unique engineering requirements of the project.
   (b) Upon the issuance of a record of decision by the United States
Department of Transportation, the authority, in consultation with
the department, shall determine that the project shall be developed
as either a design-build project under the terms of Section 20209.53,
or under the conditions of a project development agreement between a
private entity and the authority under the terms of Section
20209.54.
   (c) (1) The construction of the project may be financed with funds
provided from the State Transportation Improvement Program, federal
grants, reimbursements from property acquired by the department for a
surface highway in the vicinity of the projects, local revenues,
public debt, private debt and equity, and tolls and other user fees.
Nothing shall preclude the use of public and private revenues in the
development of the project.
   (2) Variable tolls may be imposed to manage the flow of traffic,
maximize traffic throughput, and enhance revenue generation over a
defined period of time. Public transit buses, certified by the
authority as being owned by a public agency, shall be entitled to use
the facility without charge.
   (d) The department and the authority shall be reimbursed from toll
revenues for the predevelopment work performed up to the issuance of
the record of decision. The department and the authority shall keep
detailed records of the time reported by employees for working on the
project and materials needed to conduct this work. The timesheets
and related data shall be subject to a third-party audit prior to
entering into a reimbursement agreement.
   (e) The authority shall establish and enforce a labor compliance
program containing the requirements outlined in Section 1771.5 of the
Labor Code or shall contract with a third party to operate a labor
compliance program containing the requirements outlined in Section
1771.5 of the Labor Code. This requirement shall not apply where the
authority, the design-build entity, or the entity selected to develop
and operate the project under the terms of a lease has entered into
a collective bargaining agreement that binds all of the contractors
performing work on the project.
   (f) (1) The authority and the department shall enter into a
memorandum of understanding implementing the terms and conditions of
this article.
   (2) The authority shall appoint a project manager to oversee the
management of the project regardless of the project development
strategy selected by the authority. The project manager may be an
employee or a contractor. The project manager shall report to the
authority's governing board and to the governing board of the
construction advisory authority created in Section 20209.55.
   (3) The design-build firm or the entity selected to develop the
project under the terms of a lease shall appoint a project manager
that shall represent either the firm or the entity before the
authority's governing board, at the board meetings of the
construction advisory authority, and at other similar venues.
   20209.53.  (a) The Legislature finds that the design-build
procurement method for the development of the project will accomplish
one or more of the following objectives: reduce project costs,
expedite the project's completion, and provide design features not
achievable through the design-bid-build method.
   (b) After consultation with the department, the authority, as the
contracting agency, may use the design-build procurement method for
the construction of the project.
   (c) (1) The authority may fix, alter, charge, and collect tolls,
and related fees to finance the project when constructed as a
design-build project. The revenues shall be deposited in a separate
authority fund.
   (2) The authority may issue debt for the construction of the
design-build project secured by tolls or other user fees.
   (d) (1) The authority, in consultation with the department, shall
prepare a set of documents setting forth the scope of the project.
The documents may include, but are not limited to, the size, type,
and desired design character of the proposed project; performance
specifications covering the quality of materials, equipment,
ventilation, and other operating and environmental capability
systems; and workmanship, preliminary plans, or any other information
deemed necessary to describe adequately the authority's and the
department's needs. The performance specifications and any plans
shall be prepared by a design professional duly licensed or
registered in California.
   (2) The director of the department shall approve the documents
setting forth the scope of the project prior to the issuance of a
request for proposal.
   (3) The authority and the department, individually or jointly, may
retain architectural or engineering firms and other professional
services firms to assist in the development of evaluation criteria or
preparation of the request for proposal. Firms or individuals
retained by the authority or the department, either individually or
jointly, shall not be eligible to participate in the competition with
a design-build entity.
   (4) The request for proposal shall identify the basic scope and
needs of the project, the expected cost range, and other information
deemed necessary by the authority and the department to inform
interested parties of the contracting opportunity.
   (5) The request for proposal shall invite interested parties to
submit competitive, sealed proposals in the manner prescribed by the
authority.
   (6) Each request for proposal shall include a section identifying
and describing all of the following:
   (A) All significant factors that the authority and the department
expect to consider in evaluating proposals, including cost or price
and all nonprice-related factors. The following minimum factors shall
collectively represent at least 50 percent of the total weight or
consideration given to all criteria factors: price, technical
expertise in the design, construction and operation of tunnels in an
urban community, life cycle costs over 40 years or more, skilled
labor force availability, and an acceptable safety record.
   (B) The methodology and rating or weighting scheme that will be
used by the authority in evaluating competitive proposals and
specifically whether proposals will be rated according to numeric or
qualitative values, or a combination of both.
   (C) The relative importance or weight assigned to each of the
factors identified in the request for proposal. If a nonweighted
system is used, the agency shall specifically disclose whether all
evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are any
of the following:
   (i) Significantly more important than cost or price.
   (ii) Approximately equal in importance to cost or price.
   (iii) Significantly less important than cost or price.
   (7) The authority may hold a prebidders conference with
prequalified design-build contractors to answer any questions
regarding the project and the terms and conditions of the draft
request for proposal.
   (8) For the purposes of this section, "skilled labor force
availability" shall be determined by the existence of an agreement
with a registered apprenticeship program, approved by the California
Apprenticeship Council, which has graduated apprentices in each of
the preceding five years. This graduation requirement shall not apply
to programs providing apprenticeship training for any craft that has
not been deemed by the Department of Industrial Relations to be an
apprenticeable craft in the five years prior to enactment of this
act.
   (9) If the authority wishes to reserve the right to hold
discussions or negotiations with offerors, it shall specify the same
in the request for proposal and shall publish separately or
incorporate into the request for proposal applicable rules and
procedures to be observed by the agency to ensure that any
discussions or negotiations are conducted in a fair and impartial
manner.
   (e) (1) In establishing the procedure to prequalify design-build
entities, the authority shall use a standard questionnaire prepared
by the authority. In preparing the questionnaire, the authority shall
consult with the construction industry, including, but not limited
to, representatives of the building and construction trades and
surety industry. This questionnaire shall require information,
including, but not limited to, all of the following:
   (A) A listing of all the members of the design-build entity.
   (B) Evidence that the members of the design-build entity have
completed, or demonstrated the experience, competency, capability,
and capacity to complete a project of similar size, scope, or
complexity, and that proposed key personnel have sufficient
experience and training to competently manage and complete the design
and construction of the project.
   (C) Evidence that a member of the design-build entity has
completed a major, multilane highway project that was required to
meet recognized engineering standards for urban highways with a value
of at least 25 million dollars ($25,000,000) during the last 10
years.
   (D) Evidence that establishes that the design-build entity has the
capacity to obtain all required payment and performance bonding,
liability insurance, and errors and omissions insurance coverage
sufficient to cover all design and architectural services provided in
the contract.
   (E) Evidence that the design-build entity has the licenses,
registrations, and credentials required to design and construct the
project, including information on the revocation or suspension of any
license, credential, or registration.
   (F) Information concerning any debarment, disqualification, or
removal from a federal, state, or local government public works
project.
   (G) Any instance where an entity, its owners, officers, or
managing employees submitted a bid on a public works project and were
found by an awarding body not to be a responsible bidder.
   (H) Any instance where the entity, its owner, officers, or
managing employees defaulted on a construction contract.
   (I) Any violations of the Contractors' State License Law (Chapter
9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and
Professions Code), excluding alleged violations of federal or state
law, including the payment of wages, benefits, apprenticeship
requirements, or personal income tax withholding, or of Federal
Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) withholding requirements settled
against any member of the design-build entity.
   (J) Information concerning the bankruptcy or receivership of any
member of the entity, and information concerning all legal claims,
disputes, or lawsuits arising from any construction project of any
member of the entity, including information concerning any work
completed by a surety.
   (K) If the design-build entity is a partnership, limited
partnership, or other association, a listing of all of the partners,
general partners, or association members who will participate as
subcontractors in the design-build contract.
   (L) Information regarding the safety record of the design-build
entity. A bidder's safety record shall be deemed acceptable if its
experience modification rate for the most recent three-year period is
an average of 1.00 or less, and its average total recordable
injury/illness rate and average lost work rate for the most recent
three-year period does not exceed the applicable statistical
standards for its business category or if the bidder is a party to an
alternative dispute resolution system as provided for in Section
3201.5 of the Labor Code.
   (M) Information concerning all settled adverse claims, disputes,
or lawsuits between the owner of a public works project and any
member of the design-build entity during the five-year period
immediately preceding submission of a bid pursuant to this section,
in which the claim, settlement, or judgment exceeds fifty thousand
dollars ($50,000). Information shall also be provided concerning any
work completed by a surety during this period.
   (N) In the case of a partnership or other association that is not
a legal entity, a copy of the agreement creating the partnership or
association and specifying that all partners or association members
agree to be liable for full performance under the design-build
contract.
   (2) The entity completing the questionnaire described in paragraph
(1) shall complete the questionnaire to the best of its knowledge
and belief, after reasonable investigation. Information that is not a
public record pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Chapter
3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the
Government Code) shall not be open to public inspection.
   (f) (1) The authority shall establish, in consultation with the
department, and adopt a procedure for the final selection of the
design-build entity in which the selection shall be based upon a
competitive bidding process resulting in lump-sum bids by the
prequalified design-build entities. The award shall be to the bidder
whose proposal provides in the judgment of the authority, after
consultation with the department, the best value to the agency.
   (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon issuance of a
contract award, the authority shall publicly announce the award,
identifying the contractor to which the award is made, along with a
written decision supporting the contract award and stating the basis
of the award. The notice of award shall also include the names of all
bidders.
   (3) The written decision supporting the authority's contract
award, described in paragraph (2), and the contract file shall
provide sufficient information to satisfy an external audit.
   (4) When the authority selects a design-build entity for the
project through the design-build selection process pursuant to this
article, all of the following apply:
   (A) The retention proceeds withheld by the authority from the
design-build entity listed at the time of bid shall not exceed 5
percent.
   (B) The authority shall not withhold retention from payments to
the design-build entity for actual costs incurred and billed for
design services, construction management services, or where
applicable, for completed operations and maintenance services.
   In a contract between the design-build entity and a subcontractor,
and in a contract between a subcontractor, and any subcontractor
thereunder, the percentage of the retention proceeds withheld may not
exceed the percentage specified in the contract between the
authority and the design-build entity. If the design-build entity
provides written notice to any subcontractor that is not a member of
the design-build entity, prior to or at the time that the bid is
requested, that a bond may be required and the subcontractor
subsequently is unable or refuses to furnish a bond to the
design-build entity, then the design-build entity may withhold
retention proceeds in excess of the percentage specified in the
contract between the authority and the design-build entity from any
payment made by the design-build entity to the subcontractor.
   (C) In accordance with applicable state law, the design-build
entity may be permitted to substitute securities in lieu of the
withholding from progress payments specified in subparagraph (B).
Substitutions shall be made in accordance with Section 22300.
   (D) Upon request, the authority shall provide a list of parties
that have requested a bid package.
   (E) Any design-build entity that is selected to design and build
the project pursuant to this article shall possess or obtain
sufficient bonding and errors and omissions insurance coverage
sufficient to cover all design and architectural services provided in
the contract consistent with this article. Nothing in this article
prohibits a general or engineering contractor from being designated
the lead entity on a design-build entity for the purposes of
purchasing necessary bonding to cover the activities of the
design-build entity.

    (F) The minimum performance criteria and design standards
established pursuant to this article by the authority for quality,
durability, longevity, life cycle costs, and other criteria deemed
appropriate by the authority shall be adhered to by the design-build
entity. Any deviations from those standards may only be allowed by
written consent of the authority. The authority may retain the
services of a design professional through the course of the project
in order to ensure compliance with this article.
   (g) (1) Upon the completion of the project, the authority shall
enter into an operating agreement with the department for the
operations, maintenance, and rehabilitation of the facility during
the term of the agreement.
   (2) The authority may contract with a private operator to collect
tolls and maintain the facility consistent with the maintenance
standards established by the department.
   20209.54.  (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
authority, in consultation with the department, may solicit
proposals, accept unsolicited proposals, negotiate, and enter into
comprehensive development lease agreements with private entities, or
consortia thereof, for the development of the project.
   (2) The authority may accept an unsolicited proposal, provided a
request for competing proposals is issued.
   (3) The authority, in consultation with the department, shall
establish and adopt a procedure for final selection of a lease
agreement with private entities for the development, operations, and
maintenance of the project. The award shall be to the private entity
whose proposal provides in the judgment of the authority, after
consultation with the department, the best value to the authority and
the department.
   (4) Upon entering into the agreement, the authority and the
department, acting jointly, shall issue a written statement stating
the basis of the award.
   (b) (1) The agreement entered into pursuant to this section shall
provide for the lease of the project to the private entity. The
project shall be owned by the department and the agreement shall
provide for complete reversion of the leased facility to the
department, at the expiration of the lease at no charge to the
department or the authority. At the time of reversion, the facility
shall be delivered to the department in a condition that meets the
performance and maintenance standards established by the department,
and that is free of any encumbrance, lien, or other claims.
   (2) At the time of reversion, the right to collect tolls and user
fees shall be transferred to the authority for the use of the project
and may be extended by the authority, provided revenues are used for
the improvement, continued operations, or maintenance of the
facility. This activity shall be done in consultation with the
department.
   (3) The plans and specifications for the project shall comply with
the applicable standards for a project of this type.
   (4) The agreement with a private entity shall authorize the entity
to impose tolls for use of the project constructed by it, and shall
require that over the term of the lease, the toll revenues be applied
to payment of the private entity's capital outlay costs for the
project; the costs associated with the operations, toll collection,
and administration of the facility; reimbursement to the state for
the costs of maintenance and police services; and a reasonable return
on investment to the private entity.
   (5) The department shall regularly inspect the facility and
require the lessee to maintain and operate the facility according to
adopted standards.
   (6) The lessee shall be responsible for all costs due to
development, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and reconstruction,
and operating costs associated with the project during the term of
the lease. The performance and maintenance standards established by
the department shall be included by the authority by reference in the
agreement with the private entity.
   (7) A lease to a private entity pursuant to this section is deemed
to be public property for a public purpose and exempt from
leasehold, real property, and ad valorem taxation, except for the
use, if any, of that property for ancillary commercial purposes.
   (8) The project developed by a private entity and the facility
leased pursuant to this section shall, during the term of the lease,
be deemed to be a part of the state highway system for purposes of
identification, maintenance, enforcement of traffic laws, and for the
purposes of Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of Title 1 of
the Government Code.
   20209.55.  (a) After the engagement of a design-build entity or
the entering of a lease agreement with a private entity for the
development of the project, the authority shall create, through a
joint exercise of powers agreement, a project construction advisory
authority to provide oversight of the construction and operation of
the project.
   (b) The members of the joint exercise of powers agency shall be as
follows: a member from the city council of each of the Cities of
Alhambra, La Caoada-Flintridge, Los Angeles, Monterey Park, Pasadena,
San Marino, and South Pasadena, two members of the Los Angeles
County Board of Supervisors in whose district the project is located,
a representative of the authority, a representative from the
governing board of the Southern California Association of
Governments, a representative from the governing board of the San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, and a representative from the
department.
   (c) Each member jurisdiction shall appoint from its governing
board a representative and one alternative to the construction
authority's governing board.
   (d) The project manager shall personally report monthly to the
governing board of the construction authority on the status of the
development project and the performance of the projects relative to
the project scope, schedule, and budget established by the authority
or the lessee.
   (e) Any changes related to the authority's scope, schedule, or
budget for the project shall be reviewed by the construction
authority and the implications of the changes for the project shall
be reported to the authority's governing board prior to their
implementation.
   (f) The construction authority shall review plans, schematics, and
other depictions and explanations of the project to ensure
conformity with the needs of the communities under which the project
shall be operated.  
  SECTION 1.    Section 22353 of the Vehicle Code is
amended to read:
   22353.  When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, the
City of Norco and the Bear Valley Community Services District, in
addition to the factors set forth in Section 627, may also consider
equestrian safety.  
  SEC. 2.    The Legislature finds and declares
that, because of unique circumstances applicable to the Bear Valley
Community Services District and the equestrian trails there, a
statute of general applicability cannot be enacted within the meaning
of subdivision (b) of Section 16 of Article IV of the California
Constitution. Therefore, this special statute is necessary.