BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1527| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 1527 Author: Yee (D) Amended: 7/14/08 Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE : 4-1, 4/15/08 AYES: Ducheny, Denham, Florez, Kuehl NOES: Maldonado SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE : 10-0, 5/13/08 AYES: Florez, Battin, Denham, Harman, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Vincent, Wiggins, Wyland, Yee SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 12-2, 7/7/08 AYES: Torlakson, Ashburn, Cedillo, Corbett, Dutton, Florez, Kuehl, Oropeza, Ridley-Thomas, Simitian, Wyland, Yee NOES: Cox, Aanestad NO VOTE RECORDED: Runner SUBJECT : State Surplus Property SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill directs the Department of General Services (DGS), prior to January 1, 2009, to enter into negotiations to sell at fair market value, with certain restrictions, a parcel of state property located in the County of San Mateo and the City and County of San Francisco (Cow Palace). The net proceeds of the sale will CONTINUED SB 1527 Page 2 be paid into the Fair and Exposition Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for the benefit of the District 1-A Agricultural Association, and requires reimbursement from the net proceeds of the sale of any DGS costs incurred in the disposition of the property. ANALYSIS : Existing law generally requires the Director of the DGS to perform various functions with respect to state property and provides for the sale, lease, or transfer of surplus state property. Existing law requires the Director of DGS to request authorization by the Legislature prior to the disposition by sale or otherwise of state land reported to it by a state agency as being in excess of its foreseeable needs. Each state agency is required to annually review proprietary state lands under its jurisdiction to determine what lands are in excess of the agency's foreseeable needs and to report to DGS. Existing law provides criteria for state agencies to use in determining and reporting to DGS lands in excess of the agency's foreseeable needs. Under existing law, DGS is responsible for determining if surplus land is needed by any other state agency. The law also provides that if the land is not needed by another state agency, the property is offered to local governments for any of the following purposes: "parks and recreation," "open-space," "low or moderate income housing," and "local schools." The state's network of fairs includes 81 fairs operating under a variety of governance structures, including 54 district agricultural associations (state agency fairs), 23 county fairs, two citrus fruit fairs (independent nonprofit organizations with state oversight), and the California Exposition and State Fair (Cal Expo), also a state agency fair. The 54 district agricultural associations are managed under the Department of Food and Agriculture within the Division of Fairs and Expositions. Each fair operates with a degree of autonomy with a board of directors appointed by the Governor and in accordance with state law governing the operation of state agencies. For 75 years, license fees assessed against California horseracing have been the sole state support for the California network of fairs through the Fairs and Expositions (F&E) Fund. Existing law guarantees the F&E Fund will receive $40 CONTINUED SB 1527 Page 3 million annually generated by horseracing license fees. Proposition 60A of November 2004 (SCA 18 [Johnson], Resolution Chapter 103, Statutes of 2004) which was adopted by the electorate (73 percent margin) requires, among other things, that the proceeds from the sale of surplus state property, with specified exceptions, be used to pay the principal and interest on the Recovery Bond Act of 2004. This bill: 1. Requires DGS, in consultation with Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA), prior to January 1, 2009, to enter into negotiations to sell at fair market value with an all cash sale, or cash equivalent, without any conditions relating to entitlement, to any interested third party, with the Daly City Redevelopment Agency afforded the right of first refusal, upon terms and conditions deemed to be in the state's best interest, a specified parcel of property located within the City and County of San Francisco and the County of San Mateo. 2. Makes it explicit that DGS shall not sell the real property for less than fair market value. 3. Specifies that upon acceptance by DGS of any bid, offer, or proposal, the Daly City Redevelopment Agency shall have the right of first refusal. If DGS rejects all bids, proposals, or offers obtained in the open market, then DGS shall enter into negotiations to sell the subject parcel to the Daly City Redevelopment Agency at fair market value. 4. Specifies that if the Daly City Redevelopment Agency exercises its right of first refusal or enters into negotiations with DGS pursuant to the above, then, within 90 days, the Daly City Redevelopment Agency and the Director of DGS shall enter into a written agreement to complete the sale of the property described in the bill at least at its fair market value but for no less than the accepted bid, proposal, or offer. 5. Specifies that fair market value shall be evaluated at the highest and best use of the property as entitled CONTINUED SB 1527 Page 4 with its existing zone designation, generally required for all real estate appraisals and as governed by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 6. Specifies that if the Daly City Redevelopment Agency and DGS have not entered into a written agreement for the purchase of the property within the time limit specified above without reasonable delay, the Director of DGS may sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of the property as provided by law. 7. Requires the purchaser to develop the property for uses consistent with the general plan of the City of Daly City, any amendment to the general plan, and specific plan amendments to any specific plan, and the Bayshore Revitalization Redevelopment Plan. 8. Provides that DGS shall be reimbursed by the buyer for any costs or expenses incurred in the disposition of the property. 9. Requires that the net proceeds received from the disposition of the property be paid into the F&E Fund for the benefit of the District 1-A Agricultural Association (DAA 1-A). 10.Provides that DFA, until June 1, 2012, shall assume only the rights, duties, and powers of the board of directors of the DAA 1-A affiliated with negotiating the sale of the property of the Association. 11.Requires the DFA, in coordination with DGS, no later than June 1, 2013, to provide to the Legislature a report analyzing the business operations of the DAA 1-A for the previous five years and make recommendations identifying the best use of the property. Background The Cow Palace . DDA 1-A first opened in 1941 after a long period of development. The initial proposal for construction of the Cow Palace was a result of the great success of the 1915 Pan Pacific International Exposition in San Francisco. After several attempts to develop the Cow CONTINUED SB 1527 Page 5 Palace locally, a legislative appropriation of $250,000 was eventually passed in 1931. This appropriation was to be used in part to purchase a suitable site. Twenty years after its inception, and at the height of the Depression, the Cow Palace was built under the New Deal "Works Progress Administration" (WPA) program as part of a federal effort to put Americans back to work. Since opening in 1941, the Cow Palace has hosted a wide variety of sporting events, concerts, etc., including the Grand National Rodeo, Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey Circus, the San Francisco Flower and Garden Show, the Golden Gate Kennel Club Dog Show, the Exotic Erotic Ball and Disney on Ice. While events at the Cow Palace can bring over 500,000 visitors, the facility is currently running a deficit of $600,000. The Division of Fairs and Expositions is providing a loan of $336,000 to the Cow Palace to help address the shortfall. This loan is in addition to an annual location of approximately $175,000 from the F&E Fund to the Cow Palace for the Grand National Rodeo. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 Fund Sale of state property Unknown, major revenue increase one Special* (revenue) time; revenue increase likely less than fair market value due to restrictions on sale *Fair and Exposition Fund (if the parcel was initially acquired with monies from this fund; otherwise the revenue from the sale will be deposited in the Deficit Recovery Bond Retirement Sinking Fund Subaccount pursuant to Prop. 60A CONTINUED SB 1527 Page 6 SUPPORT : (Verified 7/11/08) ACORN Bayshore Community Services Bayshore Friendship Senior Citizen Club Bayshore Sanitary District Bayshore School District City of Daly City County of San Mateo Plumbers, Steamfitters, and Refrigeration Fitters Local, Union #467 San Mateo County Building and Construction Trades Council Hundreds of local residents OPPOSITION : (Verified 7/11/08) Crossroads of the West Gun Shows Flying U Rodeo Hastings Island Land Company Horse Power Promotions Nevada County Fairgrounds Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association Save the Cow Palace Coalition Yuba Sutter Fair ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, this bill is intended to allow the state to negotiate with a willing buyer, Daly City, to bring needed economic development to the neighborhood surrounding the Cow Palace. Specifically, this bill requires the state to enter into negotiations to sell approximately 13 acres of Cow Palace property to Daly City or the Daly City Redevelopment Agency and also require that the net proceeds from that property sale be deposited into the F&E Fund for the benefit of the District 1-A Agricultural Association (the Cow Palace). As amended, the bill no longer requires that the Director of DGS, prior to January 1, 2009, to sell the property. The bill now requires that the Director of DGS, prior to January 1, 2009, to enter into negotiations to sell the property. The author's office notes that the Cow Palace has been CONTINUED SB 1527 Page 7 operating in the red with the state's General Fund making up the difference. Also, as recently as 2007, the Daly City Redevelopment Agency offered to enter into a long-term ground lease for approximately 13 acres of Cow Palace property. According to the author's office, the Redevelopment Agency offered a minimum base rent of $1.4 million, which represented a fair market rent, however the Cow Palace board of directors rejected the offer and discussions ended without a general lease and without improved revenue to the Cow Palace. Proponents claim that this bill enables Daly City to provide the community with a needed local grocery store, bank, affordable housing units, and other services to the local Bayshore community. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Opponents of this bill argue that the sale of the Cow Palace would close a historic and valuable asset of the state. With over 50,000 visitors a year, supporters of the Cow Palace argue that the facility is not surplus state property. Further, within the Food and Agriculture Code, an established process for the California Network of Fairs to dispose of fair property and direct the proceeds to the enhancement and continuation of the California fair network exists. The District 1-A Agricultural Association, in an effort to address the desire of Daly City for more retail space to better serve the community is working on a Request for Proposal to develop 13 acres of the Cow Palace site for retail development. According to opponents of the bill, this is a continuation of recently failed negotiations between Daly City, the Cow Palace, and private land owners to develop property with needed retail for the local community. TSM:cm 7/14/08 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED