BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Tom Torlakson, Chairman

                                           1565 (Kuehl)
          
          Hearing Date:  05/12/08         Amended: 04/16/08
          Consultant:  John Miller        Policy Vote: Health 11 - 0
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: SB 1565, a supermajority bill, requires each  
          grantee of California's stem cell program to provide access for  
          uninsured individuals to any drug/biologic which results from  
          the bond funded research. The bill also requires the Little  
          Hoover Commission to study the governance structure of the  
          initiative and its administrative authority.

          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2008-09      2009-10       2010-11     Fund
           Little Hoover Commission          $ 25        $ 130     $  
          0General*
          ICOC staff/regulation costs       $ 30        $ 150     $  
          0Bond**

          *Legislative authority to direct Commission actions is unclear,  
          see staff note below
          **Proposition 71 bond proceeds, 2004          
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: This bill may meet the requirements for referral  
          to Suspense.
          
          In 2004, voters approved the California Stem Cell Research and  
          Cures Act, a popular initiative which authorized the issuance of  
          $3 billion in general obligation bonds over ten years to fund a  
          stem cell research program and dedicated research facilities in  
          California.  The act established the California Institute for  
          Regenerative Medicine (institute) as a state agency with the  
          purpose of funding stem cell research activities. The act  
          directs the institute to give priority to research that has the  
          greatest potential for therapies and cures and for research that  
          cannot or is unlikely to receive timely or sufficient federal  
          funding. The institute is responsible for supporting all stages  










          of the process of developing cures and establishing appropriate  
          regulatory standards and oversight bodies for research and  
          facilities development. To oversee the institute's operations,  
          the Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee (committee) is  
          tasked with development of annual and long-term strategic  
          research and financial plans for the institute. The proposition  
          requires a supermajority (70 %) vote by the Legislature to  
          change provisions of the original proposal.

          This bill requires the committee for the California Institute  
          for Regenerative Medicine to have each grant recipient file a  
          plan assuring access for uninsured individuals to any drug  
          resulting from the public grant, and would require submission of  
          the plan prior to marketing a product. SB 1565 further specifies  
          that the submitted plans require resulting drugs purchased with  
          public funds be sold at specified reduced prices. The Act now  
          requires the stem cell program to structure grants in such a way  
          as to balance state benefit from private patents resulting from  
          institute research without unduly interfering with development  
          of new products. The institute is now drafting regulations  
          requiring 
          SB 1565 (Kuehl)
          Page 2


          grantees to assure access to new therapies for uninsured/low  
          income individuals. On March 12, 2008, the institute issued  
          draft revised regulations for grants to non-profit entities to  
          include a requirement that all plans provide access for  
          uninsured Californians, that plans be submitted prior to  
          marketing and must be approved by the institute. However,  
          development of SB 1565's provisions will extend the time and  
          necessary costs to implement this requirement. The bill's  
          provisions specifying that plans sell drugs resulting from  
          institute funds not to exceed a specified amount will also be  
          implemented with new regulations. To the extent that these  
          pricing provisions of SB 1565 reduce the costs of new therapies  
          for Medi-Cal and Healthy Families beneficiaries, there will be  
          off-setting state and federal savings. 

          SB 1565 further requires a study of the governance structure of  
          the institute by the Little Hoover Commission. The Commission is  
          annually funded a fixed amount from the Budget ($1 million GF)  
          which is available at the discretion of the Commission. Roughly  
          $150,000 to $200,000 would be required for the governance study.  
          The Commission appropriation is appropriated for research to be  










          determined by the Commission. However, this bill supersedes the  
          authority of the Little Hoover Commission by directing this  
          expenditure, creating a state cost. The study related costs to  
          the institute were estimated based on prior costs associated  
          with a state audit.

          Staff Notes: Staff of the Little Hoover Commission indicates  
          that the act which created the commission gave that body  
          exclusive authority to determine the subject and timing of any  
          commission research, and that the legislature does not have the  
          authority to direct the commission's work. If the portion of the  
          bill directing the commission to undertake the study of the  
          institute's governance structure cannot be enforced, the costs  
          associated with the Little Hoover Commission expenditures would  
          be eliminated. The Appropriations Committee has requested a  
          Counsel opinion on this matter.