BILL NUMBER: SB 910 CHAPTERED 09/21/07 CHAPTER 218 FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 PASSED THE SENATE JUNE 6, 2007 PASSED THE ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 INTRODUCED BY Senator Scott FEBRUARY 23, 2007 An act to amend Section 464 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to highways. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 910, Scott. State Highway Route 164: relinquishment. Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system and establishes a process for adoption of a highway on an authorized route by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to relinquish certain state highway segments to local agencies. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish the portion of State Highway Route 164 in the City of Temple City to that city under certain conditions. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 464 of the Streets and Highways Code is amended to read: 464. (a) Route 164 is Rosemead Boulevard from: (1) Gallatin Road near Pico Rivera to the northern city limit of Temple City in the vicinity of Callita Street and Sultana Avenue. (2) The northern city limit of Temple City in the vicinity of Callita Street and Sultana Avenue to the southern city limit of the City of Pasadena. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the commission may relinquish to the County of Los Angeles that portion of Route 164 described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), pursuant to the terms of a cooperative agreement between the county and the department, upon a determination by the commission that the relinquishment is in the best interests of the state. (2) A relinquishment under this subdivision shall become effective immediately following the recordation by the county recorder of the relinquishment resolution containing the commission's approval of the terms and conditions of the relinquishment. (3) On and after the effective date of the relinquishment, both of the following shall apply: (A) The portion of Route 164 relinquished under this subdivision shall cease to be a state highway. (B) The portion of Route 164 relinquished under this subdivision may not be considered for future adoption under Section 81. (4) For the portion of Route 164 that is relinquished under this subdivision, the County of Los Angeles shall maintain within its jurisdiction signs directing motorists to the continuation of Route 164. (c) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the commission may relinquish to the City of Temple City the portion of Route 164 located within the city limits of that city pursuant to the terms of a cooperative agreement between the county and the department, upon a determination by the commission that the relinquishment is in the best interests of the state. (2) A relinquishment under this subdivision shall become effective immediately following the recordation by the county recorder of the relinquishment resolution containing the commission's approval of the terms and conditions of the relinquishment. (3) On and after the effective date of the relinquishment, both of the following shall apply: (A) The portion of Route 164 relinquished under this subdivision shall cease to be a state highway. (B) The portion of Route 164 relinquished under this subdivision may not be considered for future adoption under Section 81. (4) For the portion of Route 164 that is relinquished under this subdivision, the City of Temple City shall maintain within its jurisdiction signs directing motorists to the continuation of Route 164.