BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           19 (Ruskin)
          
          Hearing Date:  08/27/2009           Amended: 05/04/2009
          Consultant:  Brendan McCarthy   Policy Vote: EQ 5-2














































          AB 19 (Ruskin)
          Page 2


          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: This bill directs the Air Resources Board to  
          develop a program for the voluntary labeling of consumer goods  
          with information on the emissions of greenhouse gasses  
          associated with the product.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2009-10      2010-11       2011-12     Fund
           
          Developing guidelines and         $170        $340       
          $680Special *
             monitoring compliance                                

          * Air Pollution Control Fund. Out year costs may be offset by  
          fee revenues.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: Suspense file. 
          
          Under the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (commonly  
          referred to as AB 32), the Air Resources Board is required to  
          approve a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit such that  
          total statewide emissions in 2020 are equivalent to the  
          emissions level in 1990. In furtherance of AB 32, the Board has  
          developed a scoping plan which lays out the various strategies  
          that will be used to achieve the state's goals.

          This bill directs the Air Resources Board to establish a program  
          for the voluntary labeling of consumer products to disclose the  
          total amount of carbon emissions associated with their  
          production and distribution (referred to as a carbon footprint).  
          The Air Resources Board will only be required to develop the  
          protocol if it finds that it is feasible and practical to do so.

          In order to facilitate carbon labeling, the Air Resources Board  
          is directed to develop protocols for assessing, verifying, and  
          labeling the carbon footprint of consumer goods. The Air  
          Resources Board is required to develop a standardized label that  
          provides information to consumers about the carbon footprint of  
          products - either specific information about the carbon  
          emissions associated with a particular good or information on a  







          AB 19 (Ruskin)
          Page 2


          specific good's relative carbon emissions compared to other,  
          similar goods.

          Under the bill, the labeling program will be voluntary for the  
          producers of consumer goods. If producers wish to participate in  
          the program, they must evaluate the carbon footprint of their  
          products, using the protocols developed by the Air Resources  
          Board and to provide that information to consumers.

          The Air Resources Board may adopt standardized criteria for  
          third-party verification of carbon footprint data if the Board  
          finds it necessary or it may adopt other means of verifying  
          compliance with the protocols.

          The bill authorizes the Air Resources board to assess a fee on  
          participating manufacturers to pay for its costs.

          Committee staff estimates that the Board will need at lease two  
          additional staff positions and associated expenses for ongoing  
          development of protocols and guidelines and at lease two  
          additional staff positions for ongoing monitoring and  
          enforcement of labeling requirements. 

          Staff notes that the use of carbon footprint labeling was not  
          included in the Scoping Plan adopted by the Board and thus there  
          has been no formal analysis of the cost-effectiveness of using  
          carbon footprint labeling as a means of achieving the state's  
          greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies.

          Staff notes that the Air Resources Board has contracted with  
          researchers at UC Berkeley to study the feasibility of using  
          carbon labeling as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  
          That study will be completed by early to mid 2011.