BILL ANALYSIS AB 34 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 34 (Nava) As Amended June 1, 2009 Majority vote BANKING & FINANCE 10-1 BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS 9-0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Nava, Gaines, Evans, |Ayes:|Hayashi, Emmerson, Eng, | | |Fong, Fuentes, Mendoza, | |Hernandez, Nava, John A. | | |Ruskin, Swanson, Torres, | |Perez, Price, Ruskin, | | |Tran | |Smyth | | | | | | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| |Nays:|Anderson | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- APPROPRIATIONS 13-4 --------------------------------------- |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano, Charles | | |Calderon, Davis, Fuentes, Hall, | | |John A. Perez, Price, Skinner, | | |Solorio, Audra Strickland, | | |Torlakson, Krekorian | | | | |-----+---------------------------------| |Nays:|Nielsen, Duvall, Harkey, Miller | | | | --------------------------------------- SUMMARY : Requires the licensing of all mortgage loan originators and registration with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry (NMLSR). Specifically, this bill : 1)Establishes standards, requirements, prohibitions for mortgage loan originators operating under the real estate law, the California finance lenders law (CFLL) and the Residential Mortgage Lending Act (RMLA) in order to comply with the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing (SAFE) Act (Public Law 110-289). 2)Prohibits any individual from engaging in the business as a mortgage loan originator without first obtaining and AB 34 Page 2 maintaining a loan originator's license and registering with the NMLSR. 3)Requires that a person operating a mortgage loan originator must meet and maintain education and continuing education requirements, as well as, pass a background check. EXISTING LAW : 1)Regulates residential mortgage lenders under the RMLA and the Department of Corporations (DOC). [Financial Code, Section 50000 et seq.] 2)Regulates California finance lender under the CFLL and the DOC. [Financial Code, Section 22000 et seq.] 3)Regulates real estate brokers, who make or service residential mortgage loans under the Real Estate law administered by the Department of Real Estate (DRE). FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, major increase in regulatory costs, likely in the millions of dollars to DRE and DOC to comply with SAFE (federal law), offset by new SAFE fees charged to industry applicants. COMMENTS : On November 12, 2008, the Banking & Finance Committee conducted an informational hearing to hear from a panel of experts and stakeholders regarding the passage and implementation of the SAFE Act. As a result of the information collected at the hearing the author has introduced this bill. AB 34 established landmark standards and requirements for mortgage loan originators regardless of where and how they are licensed. Under the requirements of this bill all mortgage loan originators must meet the following requirements: 1)Register with the NMLSR and obtain a unique identifier. This registration process will ensure that those persons who have committed violations in other states are not allowed to become licensed in California. Additionally, this registration system will assist regulators with tracking and, if necessary, instituting disciplinary action against originators of mortgage loans. AB 34 Page 3 2)Pass background and criminal history checks. 3)Disclosure on all advertising materials their unique identifier that is obtained from the NMLSR. 4)Meet minimum and continuing educational requirements that include education in federal law and regulations, as well as, issues relating to the non-traditional mortgage market place. 5)Meet and maintain net worth and/or bonding requirements. Does this bill apply to state chartered banks and credit unions? No, state legislation is not required for state banks and credit unions, as the enabling legislation that implements the SAFE Act is federal law, and by their relationship with the Federal regulators these institutions will be required to register their employees as loan originators by July 1, 2009. Under California law, mortgage loans can be made and originated under several different structures and licensing regimes. Mortgage brokers operate under a real estate license from the DRE. This license requires several hours of educational training and ongoing direct oversight by the department. Additionally, common law has determined that real estate brokers owe their customers a fiduciary duty. Under the CFLL or the RMLA, originators offer loans under the umbrella license of the company they work for. Under this structure, the loan originator is not individually licensed nor statutorily mandated to maintain certain levels of educational experience. This is the similar to a loan officer who works at a bank or credit union. The logic with this model is that the wrongdoing of an individual places the whole license in jeopardy so institutions are more likely to self regulate. Some distinctions have been made in recent years regarding individual employees. For example, several legislative proposals have come forward in recent years that have put some requirements on individuals in these cases such as expanded background checks. On July 30, 2008 President Bush signed into law HR 3221, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. This legislation provides reforms for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as, new programs designed to assist homeowners facing foreclosure. Among its many provisions, HR 3221 contained a section known as AB 34 Page 4 the SAFE Act ( Title V of P.L. 110-289 ), a wholesale regulatory change of the licensing and regulation of mortgage originators. The SAFE Act is designed to require every state, through consultation and coordination with the Conference of State Bank Supervisors and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators to establish a Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System that will accomplish the following: 1)Provides uniform license applications and reporting requirements for State-licensed loan originators. 2)Provides a comprehensive licensing and supervisory database. 3)Aggregates and improves the flow of information to and between regulators. 4)Provides increased accountability and tracking of loan originators. 5)Streamlines the licensing process and reduces the regulatory burden. 6)Enhances consumer protections and supports anti-fraud measures. 7)Provides consumers with easily accessible information, offered at no charge, utilizing electronic media, including the Internet, regarding the employment history of, and publicly adjudicated disciplinary and enforcement actions against, loan originators. 8)Establishes a means by which residential mortgage loan originators would to the extent possible, be required to act in the best interest of the consumer. 9)Facilitates responsible behavior in the subprime mortgage market place and provides comprehensive training and examination requirements related to subprime mortgage lending. 10)Facilitates the collection and disbursement of consumer complaints on behalf of State and Federal mortgage regulators. AB 34 Page 5 The SAFE Act requires California and other states to have a framework in place by August 1, 2009, or face direct oversight and implantation from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). States may receive an extension if they are making a good faith effort to implement the requirements. Since the creation of California's multi-layered framework, the system has been somewhat of an arbitrage where lenders could pick and choose licenses based on their business models or market needs. Some lenders have acquired licenses across all licensing laws. AB 34 reflects the challenges and difficulties imposed when attempting to craft, what is for the most part, an entirely new regulatory system for mortgage loan originators. Imposing these new requirements is somewhat easier for DRE licensed brokers as they already are licensed individually and meet several of the mandatory requirements imposed by the SAFE Act. A change to the requirements of the SAFE Act will require a wholesale restructure of those licensing frameworks. Related legislation . SB 36 (Calderon), also implements changes to the RMLA, CFLL and real estate law in order to comply with the SAFE Act. This bill is currently pending Senate Appropriations Committee. Analysis Prepared by : Mark Farouk / B. & F. / (916) 319-3081 FN: 0001251