BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 35
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 35 (Furutani)
          As Amended  January 4, 2010
          Majority vote 

           HIGHER EDUCATION    7-0         ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT   7-0      
           
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Ayes:|Portantino, Block, Cook,  |Ayes:|V. Manuel Perez, Logue,    |
          |     |Fong, Galgiani, Ma,       |     |Beall,                     |
          |     |Ruskin                    |     |Bill Berryhill, Block,     |
          |     |                          |     |Huber, Salas               |
          |     |                          |     |                           |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 

           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                    
           
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano,         |     |                           |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                           |
          |     |Calderon, Coto, Davis,    |     |                           |
          |     |Fuentes, Hall, John A.    |     |                           |
          |     |Perez, Skinner, Solorio,  |     |                           |
          |     |Torlakson                 |     |                           |
          |     |                          |     |                           |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+---------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |     |                           |
          |     |Nielsen, Audra Strickland |     |                           |
          |     |                          |     |                           |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the California Postsecondary Education  
          Commission (CPEC) to develop a strategic plan for connecting  
          education and workforce development.  Specifically, this bill  : 

          1)Establishes legislative intent to enact legislation to develop  
            a strategic plan in the education system for workforce  
            preparation and career technical education in California.

          2)Requires CPEC to work with the California Department of  
            Education (CDE), the California Workforce Investment Board  
            (CWIB) and representatives from education, business and labor  
            organizations to develop a strategic plan regarding the  
            contribution of academic and career technical education to  
            workforce development.








                                                                  AB 35
                                                                  Page  2



          3)Requires the strategic plan to address the current state  
            collection of data on future workforce needs and appropriate  
            measures for improving data collection, the alignment of  
            workforce needs with future postsecondary education programs  
            and capacity, strategies for fostering long-term improvements  
            in workers' skills and knowledge, and methods for closing the  
            skills gap and strengthening the nexus between education and  
            the workforce.

          4)Establishes legislative intent that CPEC solicit input from  
            K-12 and postsecondary education institutions, local workforce  
            investment boards, and other appropriate governmental entities  
            in developing the recommendations for the strategic plan.

          5)Requires CPEC to report its recommendations for the strategic  
            plan to the Governor and the Legislature on or before July 1,  
            2011. 

           EXISTING LAW  establishes CPEC as the state's central body  
          responsible for coordination and planning for California's  
          postsecondary education system; establishes CDE to enforce laws  
          and regulations governing the state's K-12 public school system;  
          and, establishes, pursuant to Executive Order, CWIB to assist  
          the Governor in setting workforce development policy. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, one-time General Fund cost of about $125,000 for CPEC  
          for a consulting contract and for coordinating preparation of  
          the strategic plan.  Costs for CDE and CWIB to participate in  
          this process would be absorbable.

           COMMENTS  :   Purpose of this bill  :  According to the author, the  
          current method of workforce preparation has great potential to  
          address the individual needs of a diverse population.  However,  
          the author asserts that more can be done to strengthen the  
          coordination between California Community Colleges, adult  
          education, high school career technical programs, and California  
          Workforce Investment Boards (WIBs).  The author notes that many  
          agencies are involved in workforce development planning, but  
          these agencies fail to work cohesively, resulting in a lack of  
          statewide direction and coordination on workforce development.   
          The author argues that, by requiring lead agencies involved in  
          education to work together on a strategic plan for workforce  








                                                                  AB 35
                                                                  Page  3


          development, this bill will "begin the conversation and  
          reevaluation of the state's method of educating and training the  
          majority of the workforce." 

           Existing CPEC recommendations  :  Several recent CPEC reports  
          focus on workforce development and provide policy  
          recommendations for improving linkages between education and  
          career preparation.  These recommendations include: compiling  
          and disseminating "Best Practices" for partnerships; engaging  
          the postsecondary segments in state-level collaborative  
          discussions regarding focusing research and planning activities  
          on workforce needs; increasing the focus in both K-12 and  
          postsecondary education on career development; improving data  
          linkages between K-12, postsecondary education, and the  
          Employment Development Department; assisting and encouraging  
          regional workforce strategies; and securing adequate resources  
          to support ongoing collaborative efforts.  Committee staff  
          understands that the intent of the author is not to duplicate  
          existing research but to create a strategic plan that builds  
          upon available research and recommendations and serve as a  
          foundation for continued collaboration and long-term workforce  
          planning in California. 

           Prior legislation  :  AB 365 (Portantino) of 2007, which was  
          vetoed, would have required CPEC, in cooperation with the Labor  
          and Workforce Development Agency, to convene a Task Force on  
          State Workforce Needs.  In his veto message, Governor  
          Schwarzenegger wrote:  "I am supportive of efforts to align  
          state workforce needs with program development at postsecondary  
          education institutions.  However, statutory authority is not  
          necessary for the California Postsecondary Education Commission  
          to meet the objective of convening meetings with the relevant  
          entities, and developing recommendations. Therefore, this bill  
          is unnecessary."


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916)  
          319-3960 

                                                                FN: 0003603