BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 133| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ CONSENT Bill No: AB 133 Author: Smyth (R) Amended: 5/20/10 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE : 3-0, 6/9/10 AYES: Kehoe, DeSaulnier, Price NO VOTE RECORDED: Cox, Aanestad ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 71-0, 1/19/10 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Subdivisions: major thoroughfares SOURCE : County of Los Angeles DIGEST : This bill allows city officials in certain situations and Los Angeles County officials to spend bridge and major thoroughfare subdivision fees on construction costs that include design, acquisition of rights-of-way, contract administration, and actual construction. This bill caps spending on "reasonable administrative expenses" at $300,000 a year, adjusted after 1986, for changes in the consumer price index. ANALYSIS : Current law, as a condition of approving subdivisions under the Subdivision Map Act, cities and counties can impose fees to pay for the costs of public works projects that are related to those subdivisions. Local officials can also impose subdivision fees to pay for new bridges and major thoroughfares, but they must put the CONTINUED AB 133 Page 2 revenues into a fund for each bridge or major thoroughfare project. Local officials can spend the fee revenues only for construction or to reimburse construction costs. This bill allows city officials in certain situations and Los Angeles County officials to spend bridge and major thoroughfare subdivision fees on construction costs that include design, acquisition of rights-of-way, contract administration, and actual construction. This bill caps spending on "reasonable administrative expenses" at $300,000 a year, adjusted after 1986, for changes in the consumer price index. The bill applies to construction: 1. In the unincorporated area of Los Angeles County. 2. Where the area of benefit and all of the improvements lie within both a city in Los Angeles County and the County's unincorporated area. 3. Where all of the area of benefit and all of the improvements lie completely within a city in Los Angeles County. Comments San Diego County has special statutory permission to spend its bridge and major thoroughfare fees on the costs of design, right-of-way acquisition, and actual construction which includes direct and indirect environmental, engineering, accounting, legal, and contract administration costs. San Diego County can also pay for "reasonable administrative expenses," up to $300,000 a year, adjusted for changes in the consumer price index. Administrative expenses include office, personnel, and other management expenses (AB 4351 [Cortese], Chapter 1408, Statutes of 1987). FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 6/10/10) AB 133 Page 3 County of Los Angeles (source) City of Santa Clarita ASSEMBLY FLOOR : AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Buchanan, Caballero, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lieu, Logue, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada NO VOTE RECORDED: Brownley, Charles Calderon, Carter, Davis, Hall, Bonnie Lowenthal, Bass AGB:do 6/10/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****