BILL ANALYSIS AB 142 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 14, 2009 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Mike Feuer, Chair AB 142 (Hayashi) - As Amended: April 13, 2009 PROPOSED CONSENT SUBJECT : AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS (AEDs): HEALTH STUDIOS KEY ISSUE : SHOULD CURRENT LAW, WHICH REQUIRES THAT EVERY HEALTH STUDIO MAINTAINS AED-TRAINED PERSONNEL ON SITE DURING ALL OF ITS NORMAL OPERATING HOURS IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY, BE ALTERED TO ACCOMMODATE CERTAIN 24-HOUR CLUBS THAT ARE NOT STAFFED DURING ALL OF THEIR HOURS SO LONG AS THEY COMPLY WITH OTHER NEW ALTERNATIVE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS DESIGNED TO PROTECT MEMBERS IN THESE UNSTAFFED OR MINIMALLY STAFFED EXERCISE FACILITIES? FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed non-fiscal. SYNOPSIS This bill addresses the continuing effort of policymakers in California to encourage the proliferation and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in easily accessible locations, including hotels and health facilities. AEDs are portable medical devices used to administer an electric shock through the chest wall to the heart after an individual suffers cardiac arrest. They are generally considered "fail safe," and there has reportedly been no known successful lawsuit brought against an individual for the use or misuse of these devices. This Committee has, with the help of the American Heart Association, the Consumer Attorneys of California, and other interested parties, helped fashion several measures over the years to spur the availability and use of AEDs. For example, in 2002, the Committee approved AB 2041 (Ch. 718 of 2002) by then- Assemblyman Vargas which, among other things, broadened the current immunity for the use or purchase of an AED and substantially relaxed the requirement that building owners and others who acquire AEDs ensure that expected AED users complete an accepted CPR and AED course as a condition of immunizing the AB 142 Page 2 building owners from liability arising from the use of the AED. In 2005, the Committee also approved AB 1507 (Ch. 431 of 2005) by then-Assemblymember Pavley which required all health studios, as defined, to acquire, maintain, and train personnel in the use of AEDs, for a five-year sunset period beginning July 7, 2007 and ending in 2012. This bill seeks to make an amendment to that provision by exempting those health studios, as "24-hour card-key health clubs" that do not maintain on-site personnel for all of their hours of operation, from the now standard requirement that they maintain AED-trained personnel on the premises at all times in case of an emergency. Following extensive "good faith" discussions between Committee counsel, Consumer Attorney representatives and the sponsor, the bill was recently amended to ensure these unstaffed 24-hour card-key clubs comply with new alternative safety requirements. Although such unstaffed studios would not have to maintain AED-trained personnel during the times that the studio is not staffed, they would have to meet the following other requirements: 1) inform members, at the time they enter into the health studio contract, that there will not always be an employee on the premises, 2) provide those using the studio with a device that, when activated by the user, contacts emergency services and requires users to keep the device with them at all times when using the studio, 3) provide live video surveillance during the hours the studio is unstaffed but is in use, and 4) require that all employees working on the premises complete a CPR and AED course within 30 days of commencing work. The bill is sponsored by the International Health, Racquet, and Sportsclub Association and with the latest amendments the Consumer Attorneys are neutral on the measure. SUMMARY : Seeks to create a specified exemption in the law pertaining to the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) for those health studios generally known as "24-hour card-key clubs" that do not maintain personnel on site for all of the hours during which they are available for use by the public. Specifically, this bill : 1)Exempts health studios that are unstaffed during some of the hours during which they are available for use by the public, from the requirement that they maintain AED-trained personnel on site at all times, so long as they comply with different AB 142 Page 3 safety requirements. 2)Requires exempted health studios to inform members, at the time they enter into the health studio contract, that there will not always be an employee on the premises. 3)Requires exempted health studios to provide those using the studio with a device that, when activated by the user, contacts emergency services and to require users to keep the device with them at all times when using the studio. 4)Requires exempted health studios to provide live video surveillance during the hours the studio is unstaffed but is in use. 5)Defines "live video surveillance" as live monitoring via video technology by an actual person that allows the person to make a reasonable determination from observance of an incident that either emergency medical or law enforcement responders should be notified immediately, and the person has the ability to make that notification requesting the response. 6)Requires exempted health studios to require that all employees working on the premises complete a CPR and AED course within 30 days of commencing work. EXISTING LAW : 1)Provides immunity from civil liability to any person who completes a designated CPR course and who, in good faith, renders emergency CPR at the scene of an emergency, without the expectation of receiving compensation for providing the emergency care. (Civil Code section 1714.2.) 2)Exempts from civil liability any local agency, entity of state or local government, or other public or private organization which sponsors, authorizes, supports, finances, or supervises the training of citizens in CPR. (Health & Safety Code section 1799.100.) 3)Provides immunity from liability for certain trained persons who in good faith and without compensation use an AED in rendering emergency care or treatment at the scene of an AB 142 Page 4 emergency. This qualified immunity does not apply in the case of personal injury or wrongful death resulting from the AED operator's gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. Nor does it apply to the manufacturer, designer, developer, distributor, installer, or supplier of an AED or defibrillator. (Civil Code section 1714.21 and Health & Safety Code section 1797.196.) 4)Substantially relaxed the requirement that building owners and others who acquire AEDs must ensure that expected AED users complete an accepted CPR and AED course as a condition of immunizing that building owner from any liability arising from the use of the acquired AED. Maintained the requirement that any immunities from civil liabilities in this context would not apply in cases of gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. (Health & Safety Code section 1797.196.) 5)For a five-year period beginning July 7, 2007, requires a health studio, as defined, to acquire, maintain, and train personnel in the use of AEDs, as specified. Requires health studios to maintain AED-trained personnel on site during all of their normal operating hours. (Health & Safety Code section 104113.) COMMENTS : This bill, as recently amended, seeks to maintain the requirement that all health studios have an AED on the premises while not requiring those "24-hour key-card clubs" that do not maintain personnel on-site for all of the hours during which they are available for public use to have AED-trained personnel on site during unstaffed hours so long as new alternative safety requirements are met. As newly-amended, 24-hour key-card clubs will meet AED requirements if: 1) exempted health studios inform members, at the time they enter into the health studio contract, that there will not always be an employee on the premises; 2) exempted health studios provide those using the studio with a device that, when activated by the user, contacts emergency services and require users to keep the device with them at all times when using the studio; 3) exempted health studios provide live video surveillance during the hours the studio is unstaffed but is in use. The "live video surveillance" required under the bill means live monitoring via video technology by an actual person that allows the person to make a reasonable determination from observance of an incident AB 142 Page 5 that either emergency medical or law enforcement responders should be notified immediately, and the person has the ability to make that notification requesting the response. So-called "24-hour card-key" health studios are becoming more popular, and cater to clientele who prefer to work out alone or at odd hours, but it is cost-prohibitive for such clubs to maintain personnel during all of their hours. AEDs in general. An AED is a medical device used to administer an electric shock through the chest wall to the heart after someone suffers cardiac arrest. Built-in computers assess the patient's heart rhythm, determine whether the person is in cardiac arrest, and signal whether to administer the shock. Audible cues guide the user through the process. Portable AEDs are available upon a prescription from a medical authority. Their general cost is between $1,500 and $2,000 according to the American Heart Association (AHA). AEDs can save lives . According to the American Heart Association (AHA), cardiac arrest is a life-or-death situation, and the patient has very little chance of survival without defibrillation. However, the window of opportunity for saving lives through defibrillation is very small, being only 10-13 minutes even if CPR is administered correctly. According to the AHA, in cases of sudden cardiac arrest, CPR is merely a maintenance tool, and defibrillation must take place to "shock" the patient's heart into a proper working rhythm. Thus, the public would be better served, and lives could be saved, if businesses and offices across California are encouraged to have AEDs on-site. Apparent lack of risk of accidental misuse, according to the American Heart Association . According to the AHA, AEDs contain microcomputers to accurately identify sudden cardiac arrests and make extensive use of audible prompting and signals to provide operators with clear and concise instruction, making their use uncomplicated, intuitive, and nearly foolproof. Safeguards are built in to protect both operator and victim and to ensure that the AED will only deliver a shock if, in fact, the device affirmatively determines that a victim is in sudden cardiac arrest. Further, the device does not allow for manual overrides, in the event a panicked operator tries to administer the shock even when the device finds that the victim is not in AB 142 Page 6 cardiac arrest. AED availability . According to staff research, the move in the last few years to increase the number of AEDs available to first responder units such as police and fire, as well as in high-traffic areas, such as airports and casinos, has been met with overwhelming community support. A survey of worldwide news sources indicates that AEDs have been responsible for many saved lives after cardiac arrest incidents and that AEDs are in such high demand that schools and local communities have taken to outside fundraising to purchase the equipment. Across the United States there has been a major push for wide spread access to AEDs, especially where children are concerned. A high school student in New York State had a heart attack after competing in a wrestling match. A bystander trained in both CPR and AED use came to his aid and attempted CPR but did not get a response. She then called for the AED, which are mandated by New York Law in every school, and was able to bring the young man back. As of January 22, 2006, in New York, everyone who is trained in CPR will also have to be trained to use AEDs as well. In Georgia, one neighborhood raised funds to purchase an AED after a boy was struck by a baseball while playing and could not be resuscitated. Local fire departments in Georgia are pushing for communities to pool funds and purchase the units for neighborhood use. The AEDs have been used successfully in such places as California's Ontario Airport, and Connecticut's Foxwoods Casino. According to a Foxwoods' security director, the casino has 15 AEDs on the property and has used them more than 40 times in the last four years, and more than 300 security personnel and emergency medical technicians at the casino are trained to use the machines. In the Minneapolis Airport, passengers waiting for flights can receive basic training on how to use the machine in about 5 minutes. The passengers are trained by firefighters at stations in the airport and the program is funded by Medtronic which makes AEDs. The goal of all these programs is to make AEDs as familiar as fire extinguishers and as readily available to the general public. The FDA has even approved of their over-the-counter purchase without a prescription. No known lawsuits against users of AEDs . A search of the Lexis AB 142 Page 7 Nexis database continues to reveal no news articles, or successful federal or state cases, suing for liability against users of AEDs. Committee staff research indicates that these devices are virtually "fail-safe" and easy enough for a child to use (although this is not generally recommended). No negative reaction has been found regarding the use of the AEDs, or any suit filed against someone using the AEDs. This is most likely due to the design programming that will not allow the user to administer an electric shock needlessly, therefore creating little chance of user-error in administering the AED. The only possible negative comment was that, hypothetically speaking, someone with a living will/Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order may be in public and suffer a cardiac episode. A bystander, unable to know the person has a DNR, or what his/her specific medical wishes are, may administer the AED against his/her wishes. The importance of maintaining AED- and CPR-trained staff on site . About 340,000 Americans die each year from sudden cardiac arrest, and some of these deaths occur in fitness clubs. If fitness professionals use AEDs within the first minute of cardiac arrest, they can increase the victim's survival rate by up to 90%. The American Heart Association (AHA) estimates that at least 20,000 lives could be saved each year by the prompt use of AEDs. (Amy Florence Fischbach, "AED Response," November 1, 2006, Fitness Business Pro Magazine.) Obviously, if there is no staff or even another client on hand to administer the AED shock to a client, the client cannot benefit from the machine. A victim's chances of survival drop 7-10% for every minute without defibrillation, which indicates that the first moments after an attack are critical, and that use of an emergency 911-contact device, which a heart attack victim may not even be able to activate, is insufficient protection for the victim without a staff member on hand to administer the AED. Richard Lazar, an expert on AED laws and legislation from Risk Insights in Portland, Oregon, states that training employees in AED use and making them aware of the location of the machine is just as important as having the AED itself. (Fischbach, "AED Response.") One health club company, Town Sports International, saved six lives in 18 months by having AEDs in all of its 141 clubs and also training its employees to respond in an emergency. AB 142 Page 8 The AHA recommends that AED users be trained in both use of the AED and in CPR, because "Early CPR is an integral part of providing lifesaving aid to people suffering sudden cardiac arrest. CPR helps to circulate oxygen-rich blood to the brain. After the AED is attached and delivers a shock, the typical AED will prompt the operator to continue CPR while the device continues to analyze the victim." Therefore, although the author of this bill emphasizes the simplicity of using an AED, it is important that the AED user also be trained in CPR. It is thus preferable that a trained staff member be present at all times to administer care (instead of relying on the possibility of another studio user, who may or may not be present and may or may not be trained in CPR or AED use). Furthermore, the AHA states, "It's also important for operators to receive formal training on the AED model they will use so that they become familiar with the device and are able to successfully operate it in an emergency. Training also teaches the operator how to avoid potentially hazardous situations." Training employees in AED use is neither expensive nor time consuming . The AHA's website states that a training course in AED and CPR lasts only 4 hours. As of 2006, the cost per employee was $37. Even nonprofit clubs such as the YMCA in Mission Viejo have installed AEDs and require training for their employees. (Fischbach.) AB 142 would require such training for all health studio employees. AB 142 furthers the intent of current AED laws . The current AED laws further the legislative intent to encourage life-saving use of AEDs in public places such as health studios, where individuals may suffer heart attacks while physically exerting themselves. The current law requires that health studio employees receive AED training in order to be prepared to assist studio users in the event of a heart attack. Moreover, current law requires that studios maintain trained personnel at all operating hours in order to assist studio users, recognizing that without trained staff, studio users may not receive life-saving care. AB 142 addresses this concern through a requirement that unstaffed studios provide live video surveillance in order to be able to respond in an emergency when staff are not present. Video surveillance . Live video surveillance of unstaffed health AB 142 Page 9 studios, as this bill requires, would appear to provide some measure of safety in the absence of AED-trained personnel even if the emergency contact device is ineffective. The emergency contact device may be ineffective because: (a) members may decide not to wear devices that may be cumbersome during exercise, (b) the devices could be lost or taken home by members and therefore not available when needed, and (c) since the devices could result in police arriving rather than EMS personnel they may not provide medical attention in the event of a medical emergency. An article by a health studio insurance expert suggests that live video surveillance can provide better protection to members working out in unstaffed clubs, and not just in the event of cardiac arrest. ("Is Anybody Home? How to Suit-Proof Your 24-Hour 'Key Club,'" Ken Reinig, October 1, 2005, www.clubsolutionsmagazine.com .) Such video surveillance could encourage members to exercise more caution when exercising (since they know they can be seen), could provide protection to members working out alone from being physically attacked in any way, and could prevent situations where a person is injured on equipment or in some other way and is not discovered until the next day. Through use of video surveillance, health studio franchisees that cannot afford to staff their facilities 24 hours per day would still be providing some important potential protection to members in the event of an emergency. PRIOR LEGISLATION : AB 2130 (Hayashi) of 2008, would have exempted health studios that do not maintain personnel on the premises from the requirements of maintaining personnel trained in AED at all times on site. This bill would have required, as a condition of that exemption, that such studios have a telephone on premises; as well as signs that (a) warn of the potential health and safety risks of exercising alone, (b) provide instructions in CPR and AED use, and (c) indicate the location of all AEDs on the premises. The bill died in the Senate Judiciary Committee. AB 2083 (Vargas) of 2006, Ch. 85 of 2006, extends the sunset date for another five years on the operative provisions of existing law which provide immunity from civil damages for persons or entities that acquire automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) and comply with maintenance, testing, and AB 142 Page 10 training requirements. AB 1507 (Pavley) of 2005, Ch. 431 of 2005, for a five-year period beginning July 7, 2007, requires a health studio, as defined, to acquire, maintain, and train personnel in the use of automatic external defibrillators, as specified. AB 2041 (Vargas) of 2002, Ch. 718 of 2002, broadened the current immunity for the use or purchase of an AED in an effort to encourage their purchase and use, repealed the CPR and AED use training requirement for a Good Samaritan user of an AED in rendering emergency care, and substantially relaxed the requirement that building owners and others who acquire AEDs ensure that expected AED users complete an accepted CPR and AED course as a condition of immunizing the building owners from liability arising from the use of the AED. SB 911 (Figueroa) of 1999, Ch. 163 of 1999, provided for qualified immunity to "Good Samaritans" who voluntarily apply AEDs at the scene of an emergency to try to save heart victim's lives, so long as those persons had training in the use of an AED. REGISTERED SUPPORT/OPPOSITION : Support International Health, Racquet, and Sportsclub Association (sponsor) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by : Drew Liebert and Rachel Anderson / JUD. / (916) 319-2334