BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  ACR 128|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  ACR 128
          Author:   Emmerson (R)
          Amended:  3/11/10 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  71-0, 4/8/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    School districts:  recycling programs

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This resolution encourages school districts to  
          engage in recycling programs and to promote awareness of  
          available state resources that schools may utilize to  
          establish and maintain recycling programs.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           Resolution Findings

           1.Americans go through 25 billion plastic bottles every  
            year.  Plastic bottles can take up to 1,000 years before  
            they begin to decompose in a landfill.  It can take up to  
            500 years for an aluminum can to decompose in a landfill.  
             Each of us uses approximately one 100-foot-tall Douglas  
            fir tree in paper and wood products per year.  Last year  
            Californians bought 21.9 billion carbonated and  
            noncarbonated drinks.  Even though many Californians are  
            recycling, 5.8 billion of those containers were not  
            recycled.  Recycling one aluminum can saves enough energy  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               ACR 128
                                                                Page  
          2

            to burn a 100-watt light bulb for nearly four hours or  
            run a television for three hours.

          2.California school districts dispose of large amounts of  
            waste, approximately 763,817 tons per year.  This waste  
            represents a significant loss of natural resources and  
            school district funds, as well as a potential threat to  
            the students' and staffs' health and the environment.  To  
            be responsible stewards of environmental quality, school  
            districts should review processes and operations, and  
            even curriculum choices.  They should evaluate the  
            economic, educational, and environmental benefits of  
            implementing an effective waste reduction program.
           
           3.The Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery  
            (CalRecycle) is required to provide assistance to school  
            districts in establishing and implementing source  
            reduction and recycling programs.  This assistance  
            includes a survey of school districts on their level of  
            program implementation, development of a model waste  
            reduction program, training and ongoing technical and  
            informational assistance, and information on programs for  
            other states and institutions.

          4.School districts are encouraged to establish and maintain  
            a paper recycling program in all classrooms,  
            administrative offices, and other areas owned or leased  
            by the school district and are also encouraged to  
            purchase recycled paper, paper with the highest  
            percentage of postconsumer waste, to revise procurement  
            specifications, to eliminate discrimination against  
            recycled paper, and to give preference to the purchase of  
            recycled paper.

          5.Incorporating waste reduction as part of the school  
            district's overall way of doing business can provide a  
            number of important benefits, including reduced disposal  
            costs, improved worker safety, reduced long-term  
            liability, increased efficiency of school operations, and  
            decreased associated purchasing costs.  School district  
            waste reduction programs also foster student achievement  
            by transforming the school environment into a laboratory  
            for learning and providing numerous opportunities for  
            investigation through environmentally based education.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               ACR 128
                                                                Page  
          3


          6.The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989  
            requires that all California cities and counties reduce  
            solid waste generation by 50 percent.  School districts  
            can play a critical role in a city's or county's ability  
            to realize this goal.  As a result, a school district's  
            host city or county is a natural partner in the  
            evaluation of the existing waste management  
            infrastructure and the development of a comprehensive  
            districtwide waste reduction program.  The CalRecycle  
            Internet Web site provides information, tools, and other  
            resources to support these partnerships and to facilitate  
            the implementation of successful school district waste  
            reduction programs.

          7.Large or small, a beverage container recycling program  
            can help a school earn money, help the environment, and  
            cut waste hauling costs simultaneously.  The beverage  
            containers that we recycle are kept out of the landfills  
            and can be made into new products.  Establishing and  
            operating a beverage container recycling program requires  
            the cooperation and participation of many different  
            people.  To facilitate this, schools are encouraged to  
            establish a committee of representatives that will be  
            involved in the program and who will determine the goals  
            and type of program that will be used.

           Related Legislation

           AB 747 (Emmerson), 2009-10 Session, authorizes and  
          encourages school districts, the University of California,  
          California State University and California Community  
          Colleges to establish and maintain a beverage container  
          recycling and paper recycling program in all classrooms,  
          administrative offices, and other areas owned or leased by  
          the school district or college campus where a significant  
          quantity of beverage containers and paper is generated or  
          may be collected.  (In Senate Rules Committee) 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Fiscal Com.:  No

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               ACR 128
                                                                Page  
          4

            Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles  
            Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De  
            La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer,  
            Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines,  
            Galgiani, Garrick, Hagman, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez,  
            Hill, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande,  
            Niello, Nielsen, Norby, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bass, Gilmore, Harkey, Huber, Logue, Ma,  
            V. Manuel Perez, John A. Perez, Vacancy


          CPM:cm  6/10/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****

























                                                           CONTINUED