BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 162|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 162
          Author:   Ruskin (D)
          Amended:  6/9/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENERGY, U.&C. COMMITTEE  :  11-0, 7/7/09
          AYES:  Padilla, Benoit, Calderon, Corbett, Cox, Kehoe,  
            Lowenthal, Simitian, Strickland, Wiggins, Wright

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  79-0, 5/4/09 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    Electrical generation:  disclosure of sources

           SOURCE  :     Northern California Power Agency


           DIGEST  :    This bill modifies and streamlines reporting  
          requirements for publicly-owned utilities (POUs) and other  
          electricity providers.  Specifically, this bill (1)  
          requires every retail seller of electricity in California  
          to disclose it electricity sources to end-use customers  
          annually instead of quarterly and modifies the information  
          included in this report, (2) stipulates that compliance by  
          a POU with the reporting requirement in #1 above  
          constitutes compliance with reporting requirements to the  
          California Energy Commission for the renewable portfolio  
          standard. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 162
                                                                Page  
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    As part of the 1996 electric industry  
          restructuring, retail electricity suppliers are required to  
          disclose information about the energy resources used to  
          generate the electricity they sell.  The purpose was to  
          provide customers with specific information that details  
          the generation sources used by energy service providers  
          compared to an average of other providers' generation  
          sources. 

          In recent years, POUs have seen an increase in reporting  
          requirements.  Some of the programs that require reporting  
          are the Renewables Portfolio Standard [SB 107 (Simitian),  
          Chapter 464, Statues of 2006], The California Solar  
          Initiative [SB 1 (Murray), Chapter 132, Statues of 2006],  
          and the Global Warming Solutions Act [AB 32 (Nunez),  
          Chapter 488, Statues of 2006].  The Northern California  
          Power Agency has found the reporting to be unnecessarily  
          complicated, time-consuming, and costly. 
           
          Comments

          Purpose of bill  .  The purpose of the bill is to streamline  
          the reporting process.  It does this for the POUs and  
          investor-owned utilities by making a quarterly report into  
          an annual report.  It does this for the California Energy  
          Commission by deleting unnecessary reports.
           
          Net System Power (NSP)  .  One of the reports which this bill  
          eliminates is the NSP report.  NSP represents the mix of  
          generation resources not included in the utility disclosure  
          filings, and are used to serve California load.  When the  
          NSP report requirement was established the expectation was  
          that most of the electricity purchases would come from the  
          Power Exchange, where it was difficult to track specific  
          sources of power.  The NSP report was intended to fill in  
          that information gap.  But the Power Exchange went bankrupt  
          during the 2000 energy crisis.  Power purchases have  
          increasingly been made on a bilateral basis, making it far  
          easier to track the source of power.  The amount of NSP has  
          dropped by more than 60 percent since 1998, making the NSP  
          report less useful.  Moreover, the California Energy  
          Commission, which performs the NSP calculation, believes  
          the NSP report does not provide an accurate picture of  
          power sources.







                                                                AB 162
                                                                Page  
          3


          This bill replaces the term NSP with "Unspecified sources  
          of power" which is defined as electricity that is not  
          traceable to a specific generation source. The unspecified  
          source of power will be listed on the Power Content Label,  
          but a determination and reporting of the composition of the  
          unspecified sources of power is no longer required. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/22/09)

          Northern California Power Agency (source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          California Municipal Utilities Association
          City of Los Angeles
          PG&E
          Sempra Energy 
          Southern California Edison
          Southern California Power Authority
          Union of Concerned Scientists (if amended)


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher,  
            Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani,  
            Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Jeffries, Jones, Knight,  
            Krekorian, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza,  
            Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A.  
            Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Huffman


          DLW:mw  7/23/09   Senate Floor Analyses 







                                                                AB 162
                                                                Page  
          4


                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****