BILL ANALYSIS AB 167 Page A Date of Hearing: March 18, 2009 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION Julia Brownley, Chair AB 167 (Adams) - As Introduced: January 28, 2009 SUBJECT : High school graduation requirements: local requirements: foster children SUMMARY : Requires school districts to exempt a pupil in foster care who transfers to the district in grade 11 or 12 and would not be able to graduate from high school by his/her 19th birthday from the additional graduation coursework requirements the governing board has adopted. Specifically, this bill : 1)Requires districts to notify pupils in foster care who are granted an exemption if any of the requirements that are waived will affect the pupil's ability to gain admission to a postsecondary educational institution and requires the notification to include information about transfer opportunities available through the California Community Colleges. 2)Provides that the notification requirement shall be deemed satisfied for each pupil who receives counseling services pursuant to the Middle and High School Supplemental Counseling Program after transferring into the school district. EXISTING LAW 1)Prescribes the course of study a pupil is required to complete while in grades 9 to 12, inclusive, to receive a diploma of graduation, including additional coursework the governing board of a school district is authorized to specify by rule. 2)Requires school districts and county offices of education to accept for credit full or partial coursework satisfactorily completed by a pupil while attending a public school, juvenile court school or nonpublic, nonsectarian school or agency. 3)Allows a child who is in foster care and who is attending high school or the equivalent level of vocational or technical training on a full-time basis, or is in the process of pursuing a high school equivalency certificate, prior to his/her 18th birthday, to continue to receive foster care aid AB 167 Page B following his/her 18th birthday so long as the child continues to reside in a foster care placement, and continues to attend high school or the equivalent on a full-time basis, and the child is reasonably expected to complete the educational or training program or to receive a high school equivalency certificate, before his/her 19th birthday. FISCAL EFFECT : State mandated local program COMMENTS : As of July 2008, there were 68,475 children in California's foster care system. Children in our state's foster care system often experience multiple residential placements and multiple changes in educational placements. The frequent changes in the lives of foster youth can have detrimental effects on their academic achievement. According to a report from the California Education Collaborative for Children in Foster Care, about 50% of foster youth have been held back in school, 46% will not complete high school, and fewer than 3% will go on to a four-year college. The report further points out that most children who enter the foster care system are already a full academic year behind their peers.<1> The Legislature has in the past attempted to address the poor educational outcomes of foster youth. In 1981, the Legislature declared that the instruction, counseling, tutoring, and provision of related services for foster youths are a state priority and created the Foster Youth Services (FYS) Core District Programs. The goals of the FYS Program are to identify the educational, physical, social, and emotional needs of foster youths; determine gaps in service provision and provide educational and social support services; identify inadequacies in the completion and timely transfer of health and education records to facilitate appropriate and stable care and educational placements; improve student academic achievement; reduce incidence of juvenile delinquency, and reduce rates of student truancy/dropouts; and, provide advocacy to promote the best interests of foster youths throughout California. --------------------------- <1> "Ready to Succeed: Changing Systems to Give California's Foster Children the Opportunities They Deserve to be Ready for and Succeed in School." Recommendations to Improve School Readiness, School Success, and Data Sharing. The Collaborative for Children in Foster Care. January 2008. AB 167 Page C AB 490 (Steinberg), Chapter 862, Statutes of 2003, created several protections to provide school stability for children in foster care by allowing them to remain in their school of origin for the duration of the school year when their residential placement changes and when remaining in the same school is in the child's best interest. The protections in AB 490 also included a requirement for school districts to calculate and accept credit for full or partial coursework satisfactorily completed by the student and earned during attendance at a public school, juvenile court, or nonpublic, nonsectarian school. This bill grants an automatic exemption to qualifying students in foster care from having to meet local coursework graduation requirements in addition to the state required courses which a student may not be able to complete due to the frequent residential and/or school changes. It is often difficult for youth to complete the graduation requirements of the multiple districts that he or she may have attended. Recent federal legislation affecting foster youth : Under recent federal legislation, HR 6893/P.L 110-351, states have the option to extend foster care benefits up to age 21. Research has shown the benefits of extending foster care to age 21 in improving educational outcomes for foster youth. The "Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth" compared the experiences of foster youth in the states of Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin who "aged out" at 18 with those who remained in foster care until 21. The study found that youth from Illinois who remained in foster care until age 21 were two-to-three times more likely to participate in post-secondary education.<2> AB 12 (Beall) seeks to implement several components of HR 6893/P.L 110-351, specifically the provisions that would extend foster care benefits to age 21. There is a potential for a policy conflict if legislation is enacted to extend foster care benefits to age 21 and if this bill is also enacted. This bill provides that the coursework exemption shall be granted to foster youth who would not otherwise be able to graduate by age 19 because current law allows a child who is in foster care to continue to receive foster care aid past age 18 as long as the --------------------------- <2> "Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth." Mark E. Courtney, Amy Dworsky, Gretchen Ruth Cusick, Thomas Keller, Judy Havlicek, Alfred Perez, Sherri Terao, Noel Bost. 2007. AB 167 Page D child continues to reside in a foster care placement, and continues to attend high school or the equivalent on a full-time basis, and the child is reasonably expected to complete an educational or training program or to receive a high school equivalency certificate, before his/her 19th birthday. Granting a waiver of district-specific graduation requirements to foster youth under the specified conditions, as proposed by this bill, may create a potential disincentive for foster youth to remain in school past age 19 to complete the additional graduation requirements if there is an extension in benefits in the future. If AB 12 is enacted, there may be an opportunity in the near future for the youth to be able to remain in school past age 18 and thus complete all the graduation requirements that they many not have had the opportunity to complete as a result of frequent changes in home and school placements. In consideration of the new federal landscape, and the opportunities available to California to extend foster care benefits up to age 21, and in an effort to avoid potential policy conflicts with pending legislation, staff recommends the bill be amended to delete the reference to a specific age and instead insert language that would capture possible changes to the foster care aid eligibility age. Staff recommends the following amendment or some variation of this language: On page 4, lines 9-14: (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a school district shall exempt a pupil in foster care who transfers to the district in grade 11 or 12 and who otherwise would not be able to graduate from high school byhis or her 19th birthdaythe time he or she is no longer eligible to receive foster care benefits under state law from any additional coursework requirements the governing board has adopted pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). A school district The federal legislation also includes provisions related to education stability for foster youth, and AB 1067 (Brownley), pending in the Rules Committee, seeks to maximize California's eligibility for available federal funds for transportation in order to maintain foster youth at their school of origin as much as possible. The optimal situation would be to provide school AB 167 Page E stability for foster youth. But when the changes in home placements and schools are unavoidable, this bill will provide some relief to foster youth who are disadvantaged by the lack of stability. Notification requirement : This bill includes a requirement to notify foster youth if any of the requirements that are waived will affect his or her admission eligibility to a postsecondary educational institution and deems this requirement satisfied for pupils that receive counseling services through the Middle and High School Counseling (MHSC) program. It is unclear whether simply receiving counseling services ensures that the pupil will receive the appropriate notification as required by this bill. Furthermore, with the enactment of SB 4 X3 (Ducheny), Chapter 12, Statutes of 2009, the education budget trailer bill, funding for the MHSC program was reduced and flexibility in the use of these funds is allowed at the local level. Hence, it is unclear whether districts will continue operating MHSC programs and whether the MHSC program is the appropriate avenue for notification of the provisions of this bill. For these reasons, staff recommends the bill be amended as follows: On page 4 lines 20-24: Community Colleges.The notification requirement specified in this subdivision shall be deemed satisfied for each pupil who receives counseling services pursuant to the Middle and High School Supplemental Counseling Program after transferring into the school district.The notification may also be appropriate for the pupil's parent, foster parent or the responsible adult appointed to make educational decisions for that pupil. Staff recommends the bill be amended to add language requiring a parent, foster parent or the responsible adult appointed to make education decisions for a pupil, as may be appropriate, to also be notified if any of the requirements that are waived will affect the pupil's admission eligibility to a postsecondary educational institution. Arguments in support : The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors writes, "A foster child who is in high school who has taken the required classes in their previous school district AB 167 Page F may find that their new high school requires additional classes, over and beyond those they have already taken to graduate. Completing these new classes would likely not present a problem to a freshman, who would have the time to take the required classes before they graduate. These additional requirements could present a real problem to a foster child who is a junior or a senior, and who may not have the time to complete these additional classes." Related legislation : AB 12 (Beall) requires the state to exercise its option under specified federal law to establish a kinship guardianship assistance payment program, and requires the Department of Social Services to amend its foster care state plan required under specified federal law, to extend foster care benefits to specified individuals up to 21 years of age, in accordance federal law. AB 12 is pending in the Human Services Committee. AB 1067 (Brownley) requires the Department of Social Services to take necessary actions to maximize eligibility for available federal funding for travel costs for children in foster care and requires the social study of a child in foster care to address whether a proposed residential placement takes into account proximity to the school in which the child is enrolled at the time of placement. AB 1067 is pending in the Rules Committee. Prior legislation : An identical measure AB 2138 (Adams) of 2008, requires school districts to exempt a pupil in foster care who transfers to the district in grade 11 or 12 and would not be able to graduate from high school by his/her 19th birthday from the additional graduation coursework requirements the governing board has adopted, and requires districts to provide notification to such pupils, as specified. AB 2138 was vetoed. The veto message read, "This bill attempts to create a statewide policy of exempting certain foster care students from district-specific graduation requirements. In doing so, this bill would usurp the authority of local school boards to determine the conditions under which students should be granted diplomas. Beyond the current minimum statewide requirements, local school boards have the ability to waive their own local graduation requirements based on the merit of each student's case. This bill would undermine their ability to judge each individual student's particular circumstances." AB 167 Page G REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors (Sponsor) Aspiranet County Welfare Directors Association of California Los Angeles Unified School District Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : Marisol Avi?a / ED. / (916) 319-2087