BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 184| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 184 Author: Block (D), et al Amended: 8/17/10 in Senate Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE FLOOR : 26-1, 9/12/09 (FAIL) AYES: Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Corbett, Correa, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Florez, Hancock, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero, Simitian, Steinberg, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Yee NOES: Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Aanestad, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Cox, Denham, Dutton, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff, Runner, Strickland, Walters SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE : 7-0, 8/11/10 AYES: Romero, Huff, Emmerson, Hancock, Liu, Simitian, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Alquist, Price SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 11-0, 8/12/10 AYES: Kehoe, Ashburn, Alquist, Corbett, Emmerson, Leno, Price, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee ASSEMBLY FLOOR : Not relevant SUBJECT : Special education funding SOURCE : Author CONTINUED AB 184 Page 2 DIGEST : This bill continues the current special education incidence factor formula through the 2010-11 fiscal year and makes the adjustment inoperative on July 1, 2011. ANALYSIS : In 1997, the Legislature reformed special education funding (AB 602 [Davis], Chapter 854, Statutes of 2007) to move from a formula based on the number of special education pupils to one based on a school district's overall average daily attendance (thereby removing an incentive to identify higher numbers of pupils as needing special education to drive an increase in funding). As part of this reform, a funding mechanism was created to provide additional funding to special education local plan areas (SELPAs) having a disproportionately large number of "high-cost" special education pupils. This funding is based on an incidence multiplier that was developed pursuant to a study completed in 1998 by the American Institutes of Research (AIR). Recognizing that these factors may change over time, special education funding reform called for the incidence multiplier to expire after the 2002-03 fiscal year, and called for a new study to be completed by March 2003. AIR completed this second study, which recommended that the incidence multiplier be updated at least every five years, if not annually, and that the state gradually phase-out SELPAs that have been receiving adjustment funds for the five years prior to the release of the report, and provide full and immediate funding to SELPAs identified as responsible for a disproportionate number of high cost students. The Legislature has passed six bills to extend the calculation of the special disabilities adjustment, each for an additional fiscal year, with the latest extending this calculation to the 2008-09 fiscal year. Existing law adjusts funding for individuals with exceptional needs based on an incidence multiplier, as defined, for each SELPA. Current law requires the Superintendent of Public CONTINUED AB 184 Page 3 Instruction to annually calculate the special disabilities adjustment for each SELPA based on the incidence multiplier established pursuant to the 1998 American Institutes for Research report. Specifically, this bill: 1.Continues the current special education incidence factor formula through the 2010-11 fiscal year. 2.Requires that the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to calculate the special disabilities adjustment of each SELPA for the incidence of disabilities for the 2010-11 fiscal year. 3.Specifies that the special disabilities adjustment for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 fiscal years is to be excluded from the SELPA's base special education funding (per unit of average daily attendance). 4.Requires the SPI to calculate the special disabilities adjustment for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 fiscal years and adjust this funding for each SELPA regardless of when this bill becomes operative. 5.Becomes inoperative on July 1, 2011, and as of January 1, 2012, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that becomes operative on or before January 1, 2012, deletes or extends the dates. 6.Includes and urgency clause. Comments The CDE has annually calculated and allocated the special disabilities adjustment, beginning with the 1998-99 fiscal year. This funding is sent to SELPAs as part of the overall special education funding, and is made in monthly payments. CDE began sending monthly payments to SELPAs for the 2009-10 fiscal year in February 2010 (as part of the First Principal Apportionment, also knows as P1), under the assumption that the special disabilities adjustment would continue to be included in the overall special education funding (for those SELPAs that are eligible for the special CONTINUED AB 184 Page 4 disabilities adjustment). However, while the 2009 Budget Act included an appropriation for the special disabilities adjustment (as part of overall special education funding), statutory authority to allocate those funds for the 2009-10 fiscal year was not included in the budget trailer bill language, as had been the case in prior years. As part of the P1 notification to SELPAs, CDE included a link to the calculations used to determine the 2009-10 PI, which specifically states that authority to use the special disabilities adjustment in the calculation of overall special education funding was not extended to the 2009-10 fiscal year and that CDE will not include multipliers or special disabilities adjustment funding in its Second Principal Apportionment (P2) calculation if the statute is not extended. At the point of the P2 calculation (June 2010), school districts within SELPAs that received these funds had already included the special disabilities adjustment funding in their budgets and expended some of those funds. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund Special Disabilities Prevents reversion of $69.9 million in General* Adjustment funds appropriated in the 2009-10 Budget Act. *Counts toward meeting the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee SUPPORT : (Unable to verify at time of writing) San Diego Unified School District ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, CONTINUED AB 184 Page 5 the state budget last year included funds for the 2009-10 special disabilities adjustment and the California Department of Education (CDE) has been sending school districts their special disabilities adjustment funding this past year. In June 2010, CDE announced that it did not have the authority for its distribution in the 2009-10 fiscal year and without emergency legislation it would alert the State Controller to offset 2010-11 special education apportionments for school districts that received and spent 2009-10 special disabilities adjustment funds. CPM:cm 8/17/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED