BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






          SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT     BILL NO: AB 226
          Lou Correa, Chair         Hearing date:  August 30, 2010 
          AB 226 (Torrico)  as amended  8/27/10         FISCAL:  NO

           COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT - SACRAMENTO COUNTY
           

           HISTORY  :            

              Sponsor:  County of Sacramento
                    
              Prior legislation:  None

           
          ASSEMBLY VOTES  :

          Not relevant; this is a new bill.
           

          SUMMARY  : 

           This bill would  :
          
        1)Clarify the characterization of compensation paid to a  
          retiring member that was deferred or modified based on  
          concessions in an executed collective bargaining agreement  
          between the County of Sacramento and a county employee  
          bargaining unit between July 1, 2010 and September 1, 2010;

        2)Allow implementation of the memorandum of understanding (MOU)  
          between Sacramento County and the Sacramento County Deputy  
          Sheriffs' Association (SCDSA), which represents approximately  
          1,150 safety employees, and the Law Enforcement Management  
          Association (LEMA), which represents approximately 94 safety  
          employees; and  
           
         3)This is an  URGENCY BILL  .


           BACKGROUND  :
          
           1)Existing law  :

            a)  allows public employers and employee representatives to  
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  8/27/10                                         Page 1  









            collectively bargain over wages, including benefits, and  
            working terms and conditions;

            b)  authorizes various safety retirement formulas,  
            including the 3% at age 50 safety retirement formula, which  
            is the retirement formula for currently-employed deputy  
            sheriff members of the SCDSA and the LEMA; and

            c)  sets forth the required member contributions for safety  
            retirement benefits but allows those contributions to be  
            higher (i.e., employer pays less) or lower (i.e., employer  
            pays more), as agreed to in a MOU.


           ANALYSIS  :  
           
          2)   This bill  would:

            a)  provide that compensation paid to a retiring member to  
            restore compensation the member would have been entitled to  
            receive pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement  
            executed on or before July 1, 2010, that was subsequently  
            deferred or otherwise modified as a result of a  
            concessionary amendment executed prior to September 1,  
            2010, must be considered pay rate or salary and not  
            considered to have been paid for the purpose of enhancing a  
            member's retirement benefits; and

            b)  ratify an agreement between the County of Sacramento  
            and the SCDSA and the LEMA.  Specifically, the agreement:

             1.  Changes the retirement tier for safety employees from  
               3% at age 50 to 3% at age       55;
             2.  Maintains the 3-year highest compensation average and  
              statutory cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) of up to a 2%  
              annually;
             3.  Implements a new safety tier for employees who first  
              become members of the   retirement system following  
              ratification of the agreement; and
             4.  Provides for the doubling of the employee contribution  
              for represented members of the SCDSA.


          1)   COMMENTS  :
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  8/27/10                                         Page 2  










           Postponement of Increase in Compensation
           
          The agreement includes a provision that postpones an increase  
          in compensation for specified general employees for 1 year.   
          In exchange, the county has agreed that the postponement will  
          not affect the final compensation calculation of employees  
          who retire the following year.  Thus, the benefits of  
          employees who gave up the increase during that period will be  
          unharmed.  

          This provision is consistent with past practice and statutory  
          requirements enacted when state employees agreed, through  
          bargaining, to give up pay in exchange for personal leave  
          time.  In those cases, the agreements and related statutes  
          specified that the employees' final compensation would not be  
          reduced as a result of having their pay cut.  Therefore,  
          their benefits were unharmed.
           
          This is also consistent with recent laws and Executive Orders  
          that ensure state employees who are furloughed do not have  
          their retirement benefits affected by the furloughs.


          2)   Arguments in Support  

          According to sponsor:

               These changes result from recently negotiated labor  
               agreements that will prevent layoffs without increasing  
               our pension obligations.  This bill will enable  
               Sacramento County to establish a new lower retirement  
               tier for some of our new county law enforcement  
               employees of 3 percent at age 55 with a three-year  
               highest compensation average, and a retiree COLA not to  
               exceed 2 percent annually.

               The agreement addresses the legitimate interests of all  
               parties while generating financial savings and  
               preserving services for the people of Sacramento County.  
                The measures will collectively result in a savings for  
               the Sheriff's Department of $3.7 million this year, and  
               $2 million a year ongoing.  This plan is department  
               specific - any savings and/or cuts will remain with the  
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  8/27/10                                         Page 3  









               Sheriff's Department and will not affect other  
               departments.  These agreements are fully funded by  
               employee give backs and should not result in increased  
               long-term liability for the County.


          3)   SUPPORT  :

               County of Sacramento (Sponsor)
               American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO
               Honorable John McGinness, Sheriff, Sacramento County
               Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Association (SCDSA)
               Law Enforcement Management Association (LEMA)


          4)   OPPOSITION  :

               None to date




                                      #####



















          Michael Bolden
          Date:  8/27/10                                         Page 4