BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 476| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 476 Author: Torlakson (D) Amended: 8/19/09 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE : 7-1, 7/8/09 AYES: Romero, Alquist, Hancock, Liu, Maldonado, Padilla, Simitian NOES: Huff NO VOTE RECORDED: Wyland SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 7-5, 08/27/09 AYES: Kehoe, Corbett, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza, Price, Yee NOES: Cox, Denham, Runner, Walters, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Wolk ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 52-26, 6/3/09 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Standardized Testing and Reporting Program SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to contract for an independent evaluation of the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program, including the standards aligned tests administered in grades 2 through 11, and report findings of the evaluation to the Governor and Legislature by November 2010. ANALYSIS : The Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) CONTINUED AB 476 Page 2 Program, initially authorized in 1997, requires testing of students in grades 2 through 11, including English language arts and mathematics at most grade levels, and science and history/social science at specified grade levels. In 2003, the California Standards Test (CST) replaced a nationally published "off the shelf" test as the primary battery of STAR tests. The CSTs are written specifically to test California's content standards. The STAR Program is currently scheduled to sunset in July 2011. Results for STAR tests are reported for the individual pupil, but no accountability attaches to these individual results; the state and federal accountability systems are primarily based on the aggregated STAR test scores from all pupils in a school or school district. Many elements of the STAR Program are used by California to meet the assessment and accountability requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, which requires standards-aligned achievement testing in reading and mathematics to all students in grades 3 through 8 and grade 10; and also requires science testing in grades 5, 8 and 10. This bill: 1.Requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to contract, by April 1, 2010, for an independent evaluation of the STAR Program. This evaluation is to be a meta-analysis of existing information and data from the STAR Program based upon the following: A. A report on the results of prior analyses regarding the alignment between the STAR assessments and the full range of the content standards and a determination of whether the STAR Program assesses pupil knowledge in the same manner and at the same level of complexity as expected in the content standards. B. An independent analysis of the ability of the tests to produce scores for an individual pupil that can be validly compared from year to year. C. Grade level continuity and vertical anticipation CONTINUED AB 476 Page 3 of the content standards and the ability of the tests to produce scores. D. A report on the results of prior analyses regarding pupil performance by test, grade level, race or ethnicity. E. The degree to which the STAR Program complies with professional testing standards and satisfies state and federal testing requirements for each grade level. F. The usefulness of STAR tests for program evaluation. G. The feasibility and cost of the development and administration of a diagnostic alternative test in grade levels and content standard areas that are not required be tested under federal law. 2.Requires the evaluator to include recommendations: A. To improve the quality, fairness, validity, and reliability of the tests. B. For revisions in design, administration, scoring, processing, or use of the tests to ensure compliance with state and federal requirements. C. For revisions to improve grade level continuity and vertical alignment of test content and the ability of the tests to produce scorers for an individual pupil that can be validly compared from year to year. D. For revisions to improve integration of content standards in core curriculum areas and improve the usefulness of the test to state and local educational agencies, as well as, schools, teachers, pupils, and parents. E. For revisions that would allow the STAR Program to provide pupil-level diagnostic information and to provide a diagnostic assessment for classroom use. CONTINUED AB 476 Page 4 F. Recommendations regarding alternative diagnostic assessments that align with state academic content standards. 3.Requires the SPI to provide the evaluation to the Legislature, the Governor, and the State Board of Education by November 1, 2010. 4.Requires the SPI's advisory committee on API matters to advise the SPI on the independent evaluation, as specified, and requires the SPI to add four individuals having expertise in large-scale assessment to the advisory committee for this purpose only. 5.Requires the SPI to use $150,000 of specified federal funds for the purpose of the contracted evaluation. Related/Prior Legislation SB 800 (Hancock), pending in the Senate Education Committee, eliminates grade 2 STAR testing and makes conforming changes to dates by which related sections of law become inoperative and are repealed. SB 1448 (Alpert), Chapter 233, Statutes of 2004, reauthorized the STAR Program. AB 376 (Alpert), Chapter 828, Statutes of 1997, established the STAR Program and authorized testing in grades 2 through 11. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund STAR evaluation $150 Federal SUPPORT : (Verified 8/31/09) CONTINUED AB 476 Page 5 Association of California School Administrators Business for Science, Math and Related Technologies Education California Alliance for Arts Education California Teachers Association Small School Districts' Association California Science Teachers Association ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The California Alliance for Arts Education supports the exemption of second grade students from the annual STAR testing program. They agree with the California Teachers Association that this action would free up valuable instructional time and resources at the second grade level. They further assert that eliminating second grade testing would reverse the well-documented narrowing of the curriculum in the second grade. Recent California research identifies the "pressure to improve test scores" as one of the top barriers to providing visual and performing arts instruction at the elementary grades. Further, arts teachers at the upper elementary, middle, and high school levels are challenged to provide standards-based instruction that is grade-level appropriate due to a lack of arts instruction in the early grades. Increased provision of visual and performing arts instruction in the primary grades creates a foundation of valuable cognitive, emotion, social, and physical development that positions students for successful learning across the curriculum, and sets the state for grade-level study in the arts as they move through their K-12 career and strive to meet the admissions requirements for the UC and CSU systems. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Blumenfield, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Bass CONTINUED AB 476 Page 6 NOES: Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Fletcher, Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Niello, Nielsen, Silva, Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines NO VOTE RECORDED: Block, Yamada DLW:cm 9/1/09 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED