BILL ANALYSIS
AB 682
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 682 (Bonnie Lowenthal)
As Amended June 1, 2009
Majority vote
HUMAN SERVICES 4-2 APPROPRIATIONS 12-5
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Beall, Ammiano, |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano, Charles |
| |Portantino, Torres | |Calderon, Davis, Fuentes, |
| | | |Hall, John A. Perez, Price, |
| | | |Skinner, Solorio, |
| | | |Torlakson, Krekorian |
| | | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Nays:|Tom Berryhill, Logue |Nays:|Nielsen, Duvall, Harkey, |
| | | |Miller, Audra Strickland |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Requires the state Department of Social Services (DSS)
to evaluate implementation of provisions intended to combat
fraud in the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program.
Specifically, this bill :
1)Requires that, beginning January 1, 2010, DSS dedicate two
positions to evaluate implementation of five specific
anti-fraud provisions of the Welfare and Institutions Code
related to the IHSS program and authorizes DSS to fill the
positions either by using existing resources or, if an
appropriation is provided for that purpose, by adding new
positions.
2)Requires DSS, in consultation with the state Department of
Health Care Services, the district attorney in the county with
the largest caseload, and stakeholders, including IHSS
consumers and providers, to provide a report to the
Legislature by December 31, 2010, which shall do all of the
following with respect to IHSS-related fraud:
a) Identify the magnitude of fraud in terms of the total
dollars inappropriately spent or removed from the program,
and the number of consumers harmed or placed at risk of
harm as a result of fraudulent activity, through instances
AB 682
Page 2
resulting in a fraud conviction between January 1, 2005 and
January 1, 2010;
b) Identify the number of people involved in fraud for each
of the following categories: IHSS providers, IHSS
consumers, state workers, county workers, and others. In
the case of "others," the report shall describe the
function of the persons committing fraud with specificity
but without revealing personal identifying information;
and,
c) Provide recommendations on the best means to combat IHSS
fraud.
3)States legislative findings and declarations, as follows:
a) The IHSS program is the one of the fastest growing
programs in the state, and will continue to grow;
b) Wage and benefit increases also contribute to overall
spending in the IHSS program; but, wages are, in most
instances, little more than minimum wages, benefits tend to
be fewer than in other jobs, and common benefits, such as
sick leave, are not available to IHSS workers; and,
c) While evidence of IHSS-related fraud is believed to be
very low, with such a large growing program, it is
imperative that the state and stakeholders adhere to a
zero-tolerance policy on fraud because fraud has the
potential to harm the IHSS program by removing valuable
resources.
4)States the Legislature's intent to determine the extent and
type of IHSS-related fraud in order to evaluate existing
antifraud provisions and make revisions as necessary to ensure
that the IHSS program carries out its mission of providing
services to seniors and people with disabilities.
5)Provides that the requirements for evaluating and reporting on
IHSS-related fraud shall become operative only if funds are
made available from the Governor's proposed funding increase
for IHSS quality assurance in the 2009-10 DSS budget, and the
proposed funding increase is adopted.
AB 682
Page 3
6)Provides that the provisions of the bill will sunset on
January 1, 2011, unless the sunset is deleted or extended by a
later enacted statute; but, also provides that, if the
provision requiring the report to the Legislature is repealed,
the report must nonetheless be prepared and delivered.
EXISTING LAW :
1)Establishes the IHSS program to provide personal services and
home care for 444,000 eligible poor, aged, blind and disabled
individuals by an average of 325,000 providers throughout the
state to enable recipients to remain in their own homes and
avoid institutionalization.
2)Provides that DSS supervises the IHSS program at the state
level and that counties administer services at the local
level.
3)Provides for funding of the IHSS program through a combination
of about 50% federal (Medicaid), 32% state, and 18% county
dollars.
4)Defines "fraud" for purposes of the IHSS program to mean:
"The intentional deception or misrepresentation made by a
person with the knowledge that the deception could result in
some unauthorized benefit to himself or herself or some other
person. Fraud also includes any act that constitutes fraud
under applicable federal or state law."
5)Specifies the responsibilities of DSS, DHCS and the counties
for various quality assurance activities, including activities
to ensure program integrity, including fraud detection and
prevention.
6)Prohibits persons who have been convicted of certain crimes,
including fraud against a government health care or supportive
services program, within the preceding 10 years from providing
or receiving IHSS services.
7)Provides for the recovery of overpayments to IHSS providers
and, if the overpayment is determined to be the result of
fraud by the service provider, prohibits future payments to
the provider for up to 10 years following conviction or the
term of incarceration following the conviction for fraud.
AB 682
Page 4
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, one-time costs in the range $350,000 General Fund for
two limited-term dedicated positions and for the workload
associated with the stakeholder process and producing the
required report.
COMMENTS :
Background : The IHSS Program helps pay for services so that the
elderly, disabled, or blind individuals can remain in their own
homes and avoid institutionalization. IHSS services include,
but are not limited to, housecleaning, meal preparation,
laundry, grocery shopping, personal care services (such as bowel
and bladder care, bathing, grooming and paramedical services),
accompaniment to medical appointments, and protective
supervision for people with mental impairments. IHSS consists
of four programs, including: Personal Care Services Program
(PCSP), IHSS Plus Waiver Program (IPW), IHSS Residual Program
(IRP), and Medi-Cal Waiver Personal Care Program (MWPCS). The
PCSP, IPW, and IRP are administered at the county level by
county welfare departments and at the State level by the Adult
Programs Division within DSS. The Medi-Cal Waiver Personal Care
Services (MWPCS) Program is administered through Department of
Health Care Services. A portion of the costs for IHSS services
are paid by federal funding. The entire program consists of
over 444,000 recipients and on average 325,000 IHSS workers.
In 2004, as part of the Budget trailer bill, SB 1104 (Committee
on Budget and Fiscal Review), the Legislature imposed a number
of mandatory duties on DSS, DHCS and the counties with respect
to quality, cost controls and program integrity within the IHSS
program. Among other things, SB 1104 defined and distinguished
between "fraud" and "overpayments," with fraud being limited to
traditional prosecutable acts of intentional misrepresntation,
while overpayment was defined broadly to include all instances
in which providers are paid in excess of the amount for
authorized services, whether fraudulent or not. SB 1104
authorized DHCS to investigate fraud in the provision or receipt
of supportive services, and required counties to refer instances
of suspected fraud to DHCS for investigation. It required DHCS
to notify DSS, the county, and the county's nonprofit consortium
or public authority, if any, of a determination that a provider
has engaged in fraud.
AB 682
Page 5
Need for the bill : According to the author, notwithstanding
quality assurance measures implemented through SB 1104,
"insinuations of widespread fraud persist." The author suggests
that these insinuations may be unjustified, noting that there is
a "disconnect between perception and fact" that is "not
acceptable for such a large and growing state program. ... If
we can identify fraud, we can stop it. But we can't diminsh
funding for the program based on anecdotal evidence." This bill
is intended to collect data and document instances of fraud
within the IHSS program.
Analysis Prepared by : Eric Gelber / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089
FN: 0001344