BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           682 (Lowenthal)
          
          Hearing Date:  08/27/2009           Amended: 07/30/2009
          Consultant:  Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Human  
          Services 4-1
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: AB 682 requires the Department of Social Services  
          (DSS) to evaluate existing provisions intended to combat fraud  
          in the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program. Specifically,  
          this bill: 

          1)Requires DSS, beginning January 1, 2010, to use existing  
            resources or a special appropriation, if any, to dedicate two  
            positions to evaluating implementation of five program  
            assurance provisions related to IHSS.

          2)Requires DSS to convene a group of stakeholders, including the  
            Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the district  
            attorney of the county of Los Angeles, to produce a report to  
            the Legislature by December 31, 2010 that does all of the  
            following with respect to fraud:

             a)   Identify the magnitude of IHSS fraud in terms of total  
               dollars inappropriately spent or removed from the program  
               through instances that resulted in conviction between  
               January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2010.

             b)   Identify the number of individuals involved in fraud,  
               including providers, consumers, state workers, and county  
               workers.

             c)   Provide recommendations to combat IHSS fraud.

          3)Specifies that the provisions of the bill will sunset on  
            January 1, 2011; but, also provides that if the report to the  
            Legislature is not completed before the statute is repealed,  
            the report is still required.

          4)Provides that the requirements for evaluating and reporting on  
            IHSS-related fraud shall become operative only if the  
            governor's proposed increase in funding for IHSS quality  
            assurance (QA) in the 2009-10 budget is adopted.











          5)Makes legislative findings and declarations.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions        2009-10      2010-11       2011-12     Fund
           Clarifies existing statute                $0                      
            $0                $0                General
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
          


          Page 2 
          AB 682 (Lowenthal)

          This bill incurs significant cost pressure, and possible  
          additional costs to the state General Fund and Title XIX federal  
          grant funds. This bill requires DSS to complete an evaluation of  
          the effectiveness of existing IHSS fraud-prevention provisions  
          using up to two dedicated PYs. Two dedicated PYs for this study,  
          which the bill allows for but does not require, could cost the  
          state up to $300,000 ($150,000 GF). DSS estimates that the total  
          workload could be conducted with fewer staff hours than the  
          equivalent of 2 PYs, estimating a cost of $215,000 ($107,000 GF)  
          to complete the study in the 12 months prescribed. This bill  
          allows DSS to seek funding for additional staff, but requires  
          the study with or without additional staff. Completing the study  
          with current staff creates cost pressure to backfill other QA  
          workload.

          This bill also provides that it will only go into effect if the  
          Governor's proposed budget increase to IHSS quality assurance is  
          actualized. If those funds are appropriated for IHSS QA, they  
          still create a cost to the department because DSS could have  
          used them for other QA-related efforts. This specifically  
          earmarks money from a possible future appropriation for a new  
          activity. 

          AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED: This bill is being amended to simply  
          clarify that IHSS providers must pay for their own criminal  
          background checks, unless the county or public authority choose  
          to pay for them.