BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 929
                                                                  Page 1

          Date of Hearing:  April 13, 2009

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                Nancy Skinner, Chair
                AB 929 (Blakeslee) - As Introduced:  February 26, 2009
           
          SUBJECT  :  Agricultural resources:  grants.

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the Department of Conservation (DOC) to  
          make grants for the acquisition of an agricultural conservation  
          easement under certain conditions in order to protect  
          non-agricultural values such as flood protection, wildlife  
          habitat, and open space.

           EXISTING LAW :  Enacts the California Farmland Conservancy  
          Program (CFCP) Act (Public Resources Code section 10200, et  
          seq.).  The CFCP, in part:

          1)Authorizes the DOC to issue grants to local governments,  
            districts, and nonprofit organizations to acquire agricultural  
            conservation easements and fee title interests to preserve  
            farmland.  These perpetual easements keep agricultural land in  
            private ownership while the owners voluntarily agree to limit  
            use of the land to agricultural production only.

          2)Requires applicants for an easement or acquisition grant to  
            meet three criteria: 

             a)   The parcel proposed for conservation is expected to  
               continue to be used for, and is large enough to sustain,  
               commercial agricultural production;

             b)   The applicable city or county has a general plan that  
               demonstrates a long-term commitment to agricultural land  
               conservation; and

             c)   Without conservation, the land proposed for protection  
               is likely to be converted to nonagricultural use in the  
               foreseeable future.

          3)Requires the DOC to evaluate a grant proposal based on  
            selection criteria such as:

             a)   The quality of the agricultural land, based on land  
               capability, farmland mapping and monitoring program  








                                                                  AB 929
                                                                  Page 2

               definitions, productivity indices, and other soil, climate,  
               and vegetative factors.

             b)   Whether the proposal meets multiple natural resource  
               conservation objectives, including, but not limited to,  
               wetland protection, wildlife habitat conservation, and  
               scenic open-space preservation.

             c)   Whether the city or county demonstrates a long-term  
               commitment to agricultural land conservation as  
               demonstrated by, among other things, the policies of its  
               general plan, of active local agricultural land  
               conservancies or trusts, and an effective right-to-farm  
               ordinance.

             d)   The conservation of the land supports long-term private  
               stewardship and continued agricultural production in the  
               region.

          4)Prohibits the DOC from making a grant to acquire agricultural  
            conservation easements which restrict husbandry practices  
            defined broadly as "commercial agricultural activities," as  
            further specified.

          5)Creates the California Farmland Conservancy Program Fund  
            (Fund), monies of which are appropriated by the Legislature in  
            the annual Budget Act for the purposes of the CFCP.

           THIS BILL  :  Authorizes the DOC to make a grant for the  
          acquisition of an agricultural conservation easement from a  
          source other than the Fund if the easement meets all of the  
          following criteria:

          1)The primary purpose for which the easement is being sought is  
            consistent with continuing agricultural use of the easement  
            property;

          2)The easement does not, and will not, substantially prevent  
            agricultural use of the easement property;

          3)Any restrictions on the current or reasonably foreseeable  
            agricultural use of the easement property would only be  
            imposed to restrict those areas of the easement property that  
            are not in cultivation;









                                                                  AB 929
                                                                  Page 3

          4)If the easement property has characteristics or qualities that  
            meet the original purpose of the funding source as cultivated  
            land, the easement property may continue to be commercially  
            cultivated with the minimum restrictions necessary to meet  
            with original funding source requirements;

          5)The nonagricultural qualities that will be protected by the  
            easement are inherent to the easement property; and

          6)The easement will require that a subsequent easement or deed  
            restriction placed on the easement property will be  
            subordinate to the agricultural conservation easement and  
            require approval of DOC.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The Legislature established the CFCP in 1996 to  
          encourage the permanent conservation of productive agricultural  
          lands.  In doing so, the Legislature recognized the important  
          contribution that farmland makes to the state, national and  
          world food supply, as well as the additional benefits that  
          farmland provides in the form of wildlife habitat conservation,  
          wetland protection, and scenic open space preservation.   
          Unfortunately, much of the land area needed to support the  
          state's growing population increase continues to be provided by  
          conversion of the state's farmland, particular in urbanizing  
          areas that are situated within historically agricultural  
          landscapes.  More than 50,000 acres of farmland are converted to  
          urban uses each year, and thousands more are transformed into  
          low density, unincorporated rural developments.

          The CFCP supports local efforts to conserve farmland by  
          providing grant funds (currently, from Propositions 12 and 40)  
          for the purchase of agricultural conservation easements.   
          Agricultural conservation easements are deed restrictions that  
          ensure that land can never be used for purposes that will  
          interfere with farming, while leaving farmers free to make  
          agricultural management decisions on their land.  Grant funds  
          are made available through a competitive process to qualified  
          applicants.  To date, DOC has provided grants for the purchase  
          of more than 100 agricultural conservation easements on more  
          than 33,000 acres of farmland in the state.

           1)DOC needs more granting flexibility to protect  
            non-agricultural values  








                                                                  AB 929
                                                                  Page 4


          Existing law prohibits the DOC from making CFCP grants to  
          acquire easements which restrict agricultural practices in any  
          way.  However, some funding sources (e.g., Propositions 84 and  
          1E) not currently available to the DOC are structured to protect  
          multiple uses or values such as agriculture and wildlife  
          habitat.  Accordingly, these sources, in essence, seek a  
          compromise between exclusive land uses in order to protect the  
          fundamental attributes that make the land valuable for both  
          uses.  For example, if a river runs through agricultural lands,  
          it may make sense to restrict activity in or near a riparian  
          zone, through an easement, in order to protect riparian habitat  
          or water quality.  Non-cultivated portions of farmland could  
          also be restricted because it does not provide ideal farming  
          conditions but could provide habitat or flood protection.

          This bill will allow DOC to maximize agricultural land  
          conservation opportunities by permitting the CFCP to draw from  
          more diverse funding sources, such as Proposition 84 and  
          Proposition 1E bond funds that recognize the importance of  
          multiple resource protection.  Proposition 84 provides for $90  
          million in grants and incentives for, among other things, the  
          development of regional local land use plans designed to protect  
          natural resources  and  agricultural lands.  Proposition 1E  
          provides $290 million for the protection, creation, and  
          enhancement of flood protection corridors and bypasses through  
          acquisition of easements to protect or enhance flood protection  
          corridors while preserving agricultural use or wildlife values.

          However, if this bill were to become law, DOC would continue to  
          pursue easements on properties that exclusively protect  
          agricultural uses.  This authority would only be used if the  
          Department is awarded or becomes eligible for funds designed to  
          protect multiple resources, including agricultural resources.

           2)Dual Referral
           
          This bill has been double-referred to the Assembly Agriculture  
          Committee.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          California Coastal Coalition








                                                                  AB 929
                                                                  Page 5

          California Council of Land Trusts
          California League of Conservation Voters
          Defenders of Wildlife
          Planning and Conservation League
          Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
          Trust for Public Land















































                                                                  AB 929
                                                                  Page 6

           Opposition 
           
          None on file

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Dan Chia / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092