BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
933 (Fong)
Hearing Date: 8/12/2010 Amended: 8/2/2010
Consultant: Bob Franzoia Policy Vote: L&IR 4-1
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: AB 933 would do the following:
- Require psychologists, for purposes of workers' compensation,
to be licensed by California law.
- Require physicians who authorize medical treatment, for
purposes of workers' compensation, to be licensed by California
law.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund
Workers' compensation Unknown, minor to major costs
annuallyGeneral/
medical treatment Special
requirements
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.
State employee workers' compensation costs in 2008-09 were
approximately $460 million. This represents a decrease of
approximately $100,000 from 2007-08. Total payroll increased
$103 million from 2007-08. These costs are split an estimated
55 percent General Funds and 45 percent Special Funds. Costs as
a percentage of total payroll decreased from 3.10 percent to
3.08 percent.
Utilization review is the process used by employers or claims
administrators to review treatment to determine if it is
medically necessary. All employers or their workers'
compensation claims administrators are required by law to have a
utilization review program. This program is used to decide
whether or not to approve medical treatment recommended by a
physician which must be based on the medical treatment
guidelines.
At this time, it is unknown if the state contracts with
utilization review services in other states. To the extent the
state does, and those services are less expensive than services
provided in state, this bill would result in new workers'
compensation costs to the General Fund and various special
funds. If these utilization reviews are conducted in state,
this bill would not result in new costs to the state.
The proposed amendments return the bill to the "as introduced"
version (February 26, 2009).