BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 951
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 6, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                     AB 951 (Lieu) - As Amended:  April 21, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                               
          UtilitiesVote:13-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill increases the range of various fines the Public  
          Utilities Commission (PUC) can impose on charter-party carriers  
          who knowingly violate state laws and PUC regulations.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Increases the civil penalty from a maximum of $5,000 to  
            $7,500.

          2)Increases the reinstatement fee from $125 to $1,000.

          3)Increases the civil penalty, for a charter-party carrier  
            operating with a suspended certificate or permit, from a range  
            of $1,000 to $5,000 to a range of $1,500 to $7,500 per each  
            day of operation.

          4)Changes the fine, for a charter party carrier who violates or  
            fails to comply with PUC laws and regulations, from a maximum  
            of $1,000 to a range of $1,000 to $5,000.

          5)Increases the maximum fine from $1,000 to $2,500 for every  
            charter-party carrier who continues to display any identifying  
            symbol other than the PUC symbol, and who fails to remove an  
            identifying symbol when required by the PUC.

          6)Increases the maximum fine, from $1,000 to $2,000, on every  
            corporation or person other than a charter-party carrier who  
            violates state laws or PUC regulations regulating  
            charter-party carriers.

          7)Changes the maximum fine a court may impose following a  








                                                                  AB 951
                                                                  Page  2

            conviction for operating as a charter party carrier without a  
            certificate or permit from $1,500 to $10,000 for a first  
            conviction and from $5,000 to $25,000 for a second and for  
            subsequent convictions.  Current law allows a maximum fine of  
            $100,000 for a third and subsequent convictions.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Annual increase in fine/penalty revenue, which goes to the  
          General Fund.  Given, that current revenues are about $100,000,  
          revenues could increase to between $200,000 and $500,000  
          annually.



           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  .  Charter-party carriers furnish  
            limousines-for-hire or passenger charter transportation  
            service in motor vehicles.  Charter-party carriers do not  
            include vehicles on a set schedule or between fixed termini,  
            taxi cabs, car rentals, or a city bus.  Typical charter party  
            carriers provide different sized vehicles to take a scheduled  
            group of people to another location and/or back, such as on  
            tour buses.  The group would usually reserve the vehicle as a  
            group, and would not reserve a "seat" individually.  Current  
            law requires charter-party carriers to possess a certificate  
            to operate from the PUC.

           2)Purpose  .  According to the author, this bill is intended to  
            implement stronger deterrents for charter buses that pose  
            great harm to passengers.  The author states that the current  
            statutory fines are too low to serve as a deterrent for  
            charter-party carriers who would rather compromise passengers  
            safety.

            The author cites two recent incidents involving charter-party  
            carriers who were in violation of the law.  

            On October 5, 2008, a bus crashed on its way to a casino in  
            Colusa County.  The crash killed 10 people and injured nearly  
            40 others.  The investigation report revealed that the bus  
            driver did not have the proper "P" endorsement from DMV, and  
            the bus company was currently filed with DMV as  
            "non-operational."  








                                                                  AB 951
                                                                  Page  3


            On October 31, 2008, a charter bus carrying the Alameda High  
            School varsity football team crashed in Pinole.  There were no  
            major injuries, but the CHP determined later that the driver  
            did not hold the proper license and the bus itself had not  
            been registered with CHP since 2005.

            In February 2009, surprise inspections at the Thunder Valley  
            Casino found violations in 12 of the 13 buses that were  
            inspected.  Violations ranged from brake deficiencies to loose  
            lug nuts, cracked wheels, and lighting and steering problems.

           3)Related Legislation  .  AB 636 (Jones), also on today's  
            committee agenda, requires the PUC to permanently revoke the  
            authority of a charter-party carrier if the carrier knowingly  
            employs a non-licensed or inappropriately licensed driver.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081