BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 951
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 951 (Lieu)
          As Amended  April 21, 2009
          Majority vote 

           UTILITIES & COMMERCE            13-1                 
          APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Duvall,          |Ayes:|De Leon, Nielsen,         |
          |     |Blakeslee, Carter, Fong,  |     |Ammiano,                  |
          |     |Fuller, Furutani,         |     |Charles Calderon, Davis,  |
          |     |Huffman, Krekorian,       |     |Duvall, Fuentes, Hall,    |
          |     |Skinner, Smyth, Swanson,  |     |Harkey, Miller,           |
          |     |Torrico                   |     |John A. Perez, Price,     |
          |     |                          |     |Skinner, Solorio, Audra   |
          |     |                          |     |Strickland, Torlakson     |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Tom Berryhill             |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Increases the range of various fines the Public  
          Utilities Commission (PUC) can impose on charter-party carriers  
          who knowingly violate state laws and PUC regulations.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Increases the civil penalty from a maximum of $5,000 to  
            $7,500.

          2)Increases the reinstatement fee from $125 to $1,000.

          3)Increases the civil penalty, for a charter-party carrier  
            operating with a suspended certificate or permit, from a range  
            of $1,000 to $5,000 to a range of $1,500 to $7,500 per each  
            day of operation.

          4)Changes the fine, for a charter party carrier who violates or  
            fails to comply with PUC laws and regulations, from a maximum  
            of $1,000 to a range of $1,000 to $5,000.

          5)Increases the maximum fine from $1,000 to $2,500 for every  
            charter-party carrier who continues to display any identifying  
            symbol other than PUC symbol, and who fails to remove an  
            identifying symbol when required by PUC.








                                                                  AB 951
                                                                  Page  2



          6)Increases the maximum fine, from $1,000 to $2,000, on every  
            corporation or person other than a charter-party carrier who  
            violates state laws or PUC regulations regulating  
            charter-party carriers.

          7)Changes the maximum fine a court may impose following a  
            conviction for operating as a charter party carrier without a  
            certificate or permit from $1,500 to $10,000 for a first  
            conviction and from $5,000 to $25,000 for a second and for  
            subsequent convictions.  Current law allows a maximum fine of  
            $100,000 for a third and subsequent convictions.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Annual increase in fine/penalty revenue, which  
          goes to the General Fund.  Given that current revenues are about  
          $100,000, revenues could increase to between $200,000 and  
          $500,000 annually.

           COMMENTS  :  Charter-party carriers furnish limousines-for-hire or  
          passenger charter transportation service in motor vehicles.   
          Charter-party carriers do not include vehicles on a set schedule  
          or between fixed termini, taxi cabs, car rentals, or a city bus.  
           Typical charter party carriers provide different sized vehicles  
          to take a scheduled group of people to another location and/or  
          back.  The group would usually reserve the vehicle as a group,  
          and would not reserve a "seat" individually.

          According to the author, the purpose of this bill is to  
          implement stronger deterrents for charter buses that pose great  
          harm to passengers.  The author states that the current fines in  
          state law are too low to serve as a deterrent for bad  
          charter-party carriers that would rather compromise the safety  
          of its passengers to make a profit.  Fines regarding  
          charter-party carriers can range from as low as $125 to $5,000  
          for violations that compromise the safety of human beings.

          The author cites two incidences involving charter-party carriers  
          who were in violation of the law.  On October 5, 2008, a bus  
          crashed on its way to a casino in Colusa County.  The crash  
          killed 10 and injured nearly 40 others.  The investigation  
          report revealed that the bus driver did not have the proper "P"  
          endorsement from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), and the  
          bus company was currently filed with DMV as "non-operational."  









                                                                  AB 951
                                                                  Page  3


          On October 31, 2008, a charter bus carrying the Alameda High  
          School varsity football team crashed in Pinole.  There were no  
          major injuries, but CHP determined later that the driver did not  
          hold the proper license and the bus itself had not been  
          registered with CHP since 2005.  

          In February 2009, surprise inspections at the Thunder Valley  
          Casino found violations in 12 of the 13 buses that were  
          inspected.  Violations ranged from brake deficiencies to loose  
          lug nuts, cracked wheels, and lighting and steering problems.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Gina Adams / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083 


                                                                FN: 0000601